The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Superior Essays
Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished When people think about inhumaneness, do they think of the death penalty? Killing a human just like a dog being put down. The United States government is doing just that. The government has sentenced many more people to death row and they are facing an unjust punishment. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values. Many people in the United States are facing the punishment of death row. The death penalty is used to kill a person who has been convicted of inhumane crimes. Those who are for the death penalty think it is “ preventing serious harm to innocent people and a weighty reason for using a particular penalty (as in doing justice)”(Davis …show more content…
Over the years “the reduced political pressure has made it possible for six states to abolish the death penalty since 2007; Nebraska makes it seven”( Drehle 31). The seven states have shown leadership that the rest should follow. The states are showing that the punishment is inhumane and it is not a sentence that should be given out. They abolished the death penalty because of the moral issues and the cost. If the rest of the states follow then it makes the United States open to a new idea of society. One that’s punishments are not cruel and morally wrong and are fair. The death penalty should be abolished because the punishment is inhumane and morally wrong. The penalty does not give justice because it treats the convicted criminal as less than a person. Killing a person does not save more lives. It even cost almost 3,000,000 to just kill one person because of lengthy trials and appeals. Seven states have already abolished the death penalty because they know it is not the just punishment. By abolishing the death penalty in the United States it makes American society more moral and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights. Burns thinks that by killing the person we have alleviate the anger, and have rid the world of that wicked person. We have somehow, gained retribution for the act they have committed, and shown others that we do not allow this act. But, I believe by allowing the courts to legally kill we are promoting the act of killing. We are saying it is OK, to kill someone if they have killed someone you love.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People executed or put on death row, in my opinion, are only put there as revenge for the victim. The execution is not justifying the convicted criminal’s actions, but rather the execution is only “retribution” for the crime they committed. When considering the survey in 2010, most people are against the death penalty, and even the families of the victim(s) say they would rather not have the pain and guilt of murdering another human being. If the family of a victim would rather have the criminal imprisoned, then why doesn’t the government feel the same way? There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another reason people don’t agree with capital punishment is because of constitutionality. People that are against the death punish believe that the concept of death itself is something serious and shouldn’t be taken lightly when it comes to killing a human being. They believe that the methods of execution are cruel ways for someone to die, and that the death penalty violates the eight amendment of the constitution. A third reason why people don’t agree with the death penalty is because of retribution itself. Retribution has the same meaning of revenge, and people believe that if the government decides to kill someone because they killed someone close to the victim then that would just continue a cycle of violence.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many reasons to abolish the death penalty. The biggest reasons would be the potential loss of innocents. The people of America do not want to see an innocent person executed. Seeing that makes them think that it could have been them. The anger at the criminal justice system for not finding the actual culprit and the shame that they were forced to pay for the execution would be enough to change their minds on whether the death penalty should be abolished or not.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This way, the criminal would then realize the severity of his actions and would pay for whatever he/she had done. Many believe that the “risk of a person being wrongly accused is almost nonexistent and is just an argument that opponents of the death penalty use to abolish the death penalty” (Kenneth 2005). “Supporters of the death penalty emphasize that opponents can’t prove that someone in modern time who was executed was actually innocent” (Kenneth 2005). On November 18 1998, Robin Lovitt was tried and sentenced to death on the count of murder (Kenneth 2005). Prosecutors said that an officer had “thrown away evidence [in a very intentional way]” which caused Lovitt to go back to court because of this solid piece of evidence that might have been the murder weapon which needed to be tested for DNA (Kenneth 2005).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is what separates our mentality from the criminal’s mentality. We have a mind and a conscience that helps us decide what is morally right or wrong. In the article “Death Penalty,” it states how a man sentenced to death testified that he felt his whole body being burnt (Kiener). Problems like these make the death penalty inhumane, giving a strong reason for it not to be legal in America. Why do we need to practice it?…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s not making things better, but only worse, specially to their families! The Death Penalty is a violation of natural rights. We need to replace the Death Penalty and make it a safer and more inexpensive option. It does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, and it does not follow the goals and promises to our nation. The Death Penalty is very effective, and does not make things get better.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This would change our view towards every person that has committed murder, or even people who committed horrific crimes. With a Subjectivism system, I would have a certain amount of people be the judge of a person’s case. This could change the death penalty completely; it gives people an opportunity to observe a case deeply, not just to judge a person on what his actions were. Actions don’t describe a person as a human being, and that’s why I think Stephen eye for an eye system was wrong. You can’t punish someone based on what they did; Subjectivism will give anyone on this planet a chance to avoid the death penalty.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Immoral and Inhumane Imagine for a moment, that someone inflicted a horrendous, illegal act to hurt either you or one of your loved ones. Do you then believe that that individual should be put to death for what he/she has done? That the government should be allowed to take away that person’s life, one where they may have their own family, a disability or mental illness, or loved ones of their own? Capital punishment is defined by Oxford Dictionaries as “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime” (1). I find it hard to believe that the government is killing people, their own people, for violent crimes when the punishment they could be giving would be much more humane and justifiable.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays