Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

Amazing Essays
Death Penalty The death penalty or Capital punishment is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a capital crime. However, since this punishment is established people are still wondering if the death penalty is a fair verdict. The first death penalty laws are established as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon (in modern-day Iraq). The code implies that there are twenty-five crimes punishable by death in these times. The Death Penalty Information Center states that Great Britain influences the United States to use capital punishment for those who commit any kind of offences. The first person sentences to death it is Captain George Kendall, he is hanged for …show more content…
The death penalty makes a judgment of the life of any person, even a guilty person, that they no longer hold a value or a purpose in this life. In a study carries by Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) 77% of people favor the death penalty because they fear "that even the most dangerous murderers will be released in seven years if they are not executed" (Frame 51). Some people in the United States believe that capital punishment should not be abolished, just updated and made more efficient. What is suggested is the use of nitrogen asphyxiation which simply puts someone to sleep. Creque suggests in his article "Killing With Kindness" that it is okay to punish a human being by this method. People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life. Fear of being robbed, raped and murdered. In societies that have abolished the death penalty, prison cells are overcrowded and many of them are repeated offenders who, despite their incarceration are still actively involved in orchestrating criminal offences. Therefore, it means that imprisonment is not as effective as it ought to be. If many of these offenders are given the death penalty then the number of crimes recorded would probably be less. For example, Jerry Hobbs

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their execution protects citizens from future murder" (Haag 2005). Most criminals and murderers are afraid of at least one very thing and that is death. They had their chance to contribute with society but they only wanted to destroy parts of…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the death penalty deters, the by definition, it results in a society in which there would be if the death penalty were not invoked. Current debate on capital punishment centers, as usual, on question of deterrence and retribution. some death penalty supporters argue that in certain instances the threat of the death penalty stops people from committing murder, and that this alone justifies capital punishment (Mitchell106). The death penalty is society’s way of telling a person that when he/she commit a crimes as bad as murder they are not fit to line among us. The death penalty while not bring back the victims of the violent crime, but will act as a deterrent of crime and it will save lives those who disagree only need to look at the account of the August 1977 riot at Eastern Correctional Facility, where correctional officers being held hostage overheard inmates deciding against executing the hostages because at the time, it was a capital offense.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jesus Hernandez Is it acceptable in any case to kill a possible innocent human? Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a man or woman to death instead of him or her serving time in a penitentiary for committing a serious crime like murder. This is an issue everyone should be concerned about because taking away someone’s life is serious and cannot be undone. This issue cannot be focused on by only the government because the citizens need to know how it is affecting them as well. Families could lose loved ones due to a death sentence, and the taxpayers have to pay out of their own pockets for the cost of the execution.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example one argument that would go against the idea is presented from the view of a Kantian. This argument says you cannot treat a person as a mere means. This is saying that even though someone may of committed a crime worthy of the death penalty, it is not permissible for the person to receive it because that would be treating them as a mere means. In addition to the death penalty being used for retribution another way it can be used is for deterrence. It is thought that the death penalty is a good way to deter others from committing similar crimes because if they see that a person is sentenced to death they will not want the same out come, resulting in the person not committing the crime.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The death penalty is a capital punishment where criminals that have been convicted are put to death by the government (Issitt). The death penalty started over 400 years ago in America when George Kendall committed espionage and was sentenced to a hanging in 1608 (Issitt). This…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There’s a possibility that a person is falsely accused for murder and taken into custody while the real culprit is still on the loose. The death penalty, simply put, is far too risky and there’s always room for error in the system. The risk of killing a falsely accused convict and the painlessness of lethal injection should aid in the removal of the death penalty from the list of possible punishments. Since lethal injection is formulated to be virtually painless and hundreds of people have been exonerated nationwide for a crime, does the death penalty serve any justice? “Setting an example is not the main means of influencing others, it is the only means.” -Albert…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminals don’t deserve a punishment that effects everyone around them. They deserve to sit in prison for life. They shouldn’t be put to death that’s an easy way out. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it violates human rights, it is highly expensive, and it has systematic problems. Those who approve the death penalty believe that it brings justice to the victims’ families and they see it as an “eye for an eye” revenge.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fear that would keep them from killing while in prison. Along with this sticking a murder in prison for life would be a worse decision simply because they could escape. Just to return to killing more. Some people…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics