Creativity Vs Discipline

Better Essays
Within good writing, there is a distinct balance between creativity and discipline. Strunk (1918) argues, “In exposition and in argument, the writer must likewise never lose his hold upon the concrete, and even when he is dealing with general principles he must give particular instances of their application” (p. 23). To write an effective analytical paper, a writer should convey ideas by being conscious of mechanical and grammatical mistakes but should also develop personal style and creativity within those constraints.
Rosenwasser and Stephen (2011) argue that the five analytical moves are the best way to convey a message while effectively balancing creativity and discipline. These “moves” begin with first, completely understanding the subject
…show more content…
The four strategies for “reforming binaries,” or analyzing closely, begins with first locating a range of opposing categories (p. 94). This allows a writer to “uncover oppositions in your subject matter that might function as organizing contrasts” (p. 95). The second step is defining key terms within the binaries. This permits a writer to understand each binary at a deeper level than just distinguishing contrasts (p. 95). The third step is a lot like the first in that it asks the author to question binary terms. The main difference within this step is that after questioning the terms the author should rephrase, to set up a statement of refinement (p. 95). Finally, the last step of the binary reformation is to strategize a way in which the author fashions questions that answer “either/or” (p. 95). Utilizing previous steps and prior knowledge, this process allows the writer to create arguments (p. 95). Reformulating binaries is essential in developing careful, accurate arguments. Rosenwasser and Stephen (2011) argue that utilizing a process like this in writing will help achieve several outcomes. First, discover that the author has not named the binary properly, or identify the author may have weighed heavily on side of the binary than the other. Lastly, detect if the author may have terms that closely relate in nature, or can be separated into different issues (p. …show more content…
Toulimin’s model of argument renames and reorders the process of reasoning described in the Aristotelian syllogism (Rosenwasser & Stephen, 2011, p. 194). Toulimin first identifies what data, or what the evidence is based on to support a statement. Next, Toulimin questions reason. Toulimin identifies this as a “warrant” (p. 194). Within the warrant, “a general principle or reason used to connect the data with the claim” (p. 194). Finally, Toulimin creates a “claim” to the response, data, and the warrant. Using an argument process like Toulimin’s, allows research to move towards truth and could ultimately provide more of a pluralistic outcome. If a writer were to use Toulimin’s model of argument, he or she leaves the argument open to assumptions within their claim. Toulimin is leading an argument towards “recognizing claims, data, warrants” which is much more diverse than the syllogistic

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Which one is better to use largely depends on the goal of the whole project. Is the writer interested in a systematic approach and wants to produce comparable data, or is he/she trying to produce a thick description on a particular situation, case, or context? The two options require different planning for research, and it should be followed by the specific outline (Creswell, 2008). However, the combination or a mixed method approaches are possible too and from the practise, it seems to be a useful way of solving many problems, which might arise from adopting a single method (Bryman, 2008 pp. 23-24).…

    • 1045 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Critical rationalism: this is Poppers theory of knowledge, in which it is explained in few steps for a clearer understanding. Firstly knowledge is about noticing a problem, once the problem has been noticed there has to be something done to solve it this means brainstorming different solutions to solve the problem, this solution will be criticized until only one solution remains to solve the problem further. To understand better Popper’s theory I separated the words and looked at their different meaning. CRITICAL-judgements, criticism of something, RATIONALISM-the view that regards reason as chief source and test of knowledge, when this words are combined they mean criticism of knowledge. () explains the background of critical rationalism, he explains that this theory is described better in Karl Popper’s book called The Open Society and its Enemies.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “A strong use of the work of others is always grounded in a scrupulous care in citing their texts.”(Harris 31) Harris, as an author, wants the reader to be able to better learn how to rewrite works of literature in our own terms using proper quotes and concisely, yet completely explaining the author’s “project” and how and why the author wrote it from that point of view. He goes about making his point by completely explaining each of the things he says in a way he believes is full and rich, as well as giving examples that he sees fitting to the way he presented the information, and using proper separation of each of the topics that he wants to explain and give examples…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Toulmin Method uses data, claims, and warrants to prove a principal. The warrant is at the center of the reasoning and connects the data with the claim, and is usually the generalization the is used to explain how the claim and data are connected. The warrant can be views as the thinking that lead the writer on to the opinion that they hold. V. Deductive and Inductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning can be viewed as reasoning based on experiences mixed with general reasoning. For inductive reasoning to work, the method of collecting evidence to use to base a reasoning from.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourthly, an Hegelian inquiry system is based on forming a thesis and its antithesis proceeding towards a synthesis in a dialogue (ibid). This implies that a “Hegelian Delphi study would form a plan and its counter plan, which would transcend into a new synthetic plan through discussions” (Mitroff and Turoff, 1975, cited in Tapio et al., 2011, p.1626). Moreover, quantitative and qualitative enquiry methods for Hegel are interlinked, because extensive change in quantity also affects quality (ibid). Also Mitroff and Turoff (1975) argue that in…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Thinking deeply about the arbitrary and conventional nature of language and the importance and power of rhetorical strategy impacts my understanding of the writing act. It would help me to understand what I’m reading better. Also, it would be more clear to read the essay than the one without the rhetorical strategy. Rhetorical strategies are Logos, Pathos, Ethos and the essay will be based on one of the appeals. I would know if the essay is about logos it would be something based on logic so it would give me an idea of what to think about when I’m reading the essay.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For a body paragraph to be effective, the author should avoid vague generalities. The four means to achieve paragraph unity is to make sure every sentence relates to the topic sentence’s main idea, avoid topic draft, beware the tendency to end paragraphs with new ideas, and the support sentences must support the topic sentence. The writer needs to know that informal or working outlines are there to help the writer not control the writer. The author should start a body paragraph with a topic…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So far, through reading The Theory Toolbox, we have explored authority which deals with how an author gains credulity to move from the status of a writer to an acclaimed authority. This section was particularly interesting due to the point the speaker made about interpretative ambiguity which separates mediocre writing from exceptional writing. We also examined the responsibility of the reader, which is to actively interpret the information at hand. The portion in the reading section that discussed how the meaning of a word changes depending on context is especially important when analyzing the persuasion of a piece because in different contexts the…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    McQueen& Knussen (2013) concur this further highlighting how a more detailed perspective is procured through qualitative research. Furthermore Newman, Jarvis & Holland (2012), Bell & Waters (2014) and Grix (2010) debate how through the use of ‘methodological triangulation’ within the interpretive paradigm, such as questionnaires, interviews and observations, a more in-depth study is enabled. Conversely Blaikie (2000) warns of the problems faced in triangulation with regards to validity, due to the inexperience of the novice researcher when combining data collection methods. However triangulation is considered by Savin-Baden & Major (2013) to give…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Persuasive Argument

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each topic sentence, in its turn, is backed up with the help of various reasoning techniques such as analogies, comparisons, logical arguments, research results, using facts. E. L. Chesla, an expert on writing, advises you to use the following six strategies to be persuasive: “Be specific; don’t include ideas you can’t support; establish credibility; acknowledge counterarguments; avoid absolutes; don’t offend” (p. 85). You can be quite authoritative, expressing your view point. It would be expedient if you presented an opposing opinion and then proved it wrong in the third paragraph of the main…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics