Jill Lepore After The Fact Summary

Improved Essays
Summary
The article “After the Fact” by Jill Lepore examines how easily influenced society is in terms of distinguishing what is actually true and what people tend to perceive is the truth. The main argument of this article outlines the idea that “the place once held by “facts” is being taken over by data” (Lepore, 2016). In the article, she also argues that citizens are easily lured by claims made by politicians, rather than reasoning with their own judgment. For example; she states that “Trump doesn’t reason”; he calls people liars and since no one can prove that those individuals are not liars, it can be claimed that he is telling the truth. This then justifies her argument that individuals only know things because of Google; but without
…show more content…
“The Internet has become a primary form of external or "trans active" memory where information is stored collectively outside the brain.” (CITE). Instead of having to memorize ideas and facts, we can “Google” them, giving us the advantage of saving time which would have been taken up by thinking. The internet also provides us with a source of validation and evidence to justify what we know as true.
Cons
Although depending on the internet may not seem to be as bad as it is thought to be, it takes away from the notion of thinking for ourselves. “We no longer take responsibility for our own beliefs, and we lack the capacity to see how bits of facts fit into a larger whole.” (7, Lepore) By referring back to the internet to justify our facts and get answers, we fail to understand how these answers are related to one another and how this knowledge fits together. However, Lynch believes it’s not the internet to blame but the paradox that “reason can’t defend itself without reason”. In order to explain something, we need evidence, however; this evidence cannot support itself without other evidence; henceforth, we gain this evidence through the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In today's world we are introduced to new technology everyday, that is made to make our lives both easier and better. Although in the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr provides the reader with his own thoughts on how he feels that the internet is taking over. Carr first explains that the internet has caused focusing issues forever everyone including himself. And continues to add that his life has become immersed in the internet, for he now struggles to stay connected to one task without feeling any temptations to use the easier to access internet. Like all successful writers Carr had to use rhetorical appeals to draw in an audience to read his article.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Carr takes the idea that media “[shapes] the process of thought,” relating it to how the “Net [chips] away [his] capacity for concentration and contemplation.” This jump in association simply makes no sense. McLuhan’s theory presents itself as an inherently neutral one - this shaping construes just mere perspective, it takes no moral ground. However, Carr uses this to verify how the internet negatively affects his own anecdotal capacity for focusing; he incorrectly appropriates a neutral theory, changing it into something that directly supports his own argument and indirectly condemns technology’s effects. Carr attempts to support his own experience through the shared sentiment of others, specifically bloggers Scott Karp and Bruce Friedman, regarding how technology distracts.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    it helps us learn about other cultures and other people, as well as a source for a lot of drama. The quote “The Net’s influence doesn’t end at the edge of a computer screen.” found on page 94 in the book The Shallows, supports the thesis that the internet is a good thing. By indicating that not only…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Google Making USupid

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr emphasizes that he believes that the internet, Google in particular, is causing a negative change in the way people think. Throughout his article, Carr makes numerous great points and provides much evidence to support his claims. Although a majority of his points are valuable, not all convey his thoughts adequately or administer the right emotions. It is also important to point out that placing the blame solely on the internet, and not acknowledging that there are other factors that may contribute to this problem, is a bit of a reach. Carr cites different sources, such as theorist Marshall McLuhan and psychologist Maryanne Wolf, to give his statements some credibility.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology—mainly the invention of the Internet—is supposed to make lifeline easier, but according to Nicholas Carr, the invention has diminished our ability to comprehend the world of literature. In his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” he explains how our brains have been reprogrammed to think, due to the way the Internet spoon feeds us the information we are requesting, in the most elementary ways. Throughout the entirety of the article Carr battles with the idea of whether or not the Internet is an instrument of knowledge or whether or not it will one day be the cause of an ignorant society. Inventions such as the typewriter and the Internet, Carr explains, have altered the way we think about and explore writing. Today, the Internet…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas Carr Rhetoric

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this article, the writer Nicholas Carr attempts to explain how is the information offered on the internet has reformed our method of intelligent. He uses several altered techniques to play on the reader’s emotions by using stories, studies, and his own reflection to try to convince the audience that the internet has been unfavorable to our intelligent and knowledge ways. For the most part of his argument is unproductive because of his organization, his choice of sources, and his tone. Carr started his article with a quote from 2001 called A Space Odyssey. He clarifies the quote, speaking about in what way the human is modernizing the PC, but then the equivalents that with how PCs have renewed his brain.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I do not disagree that the internet may have made it more difficult to pay attention to the multitude of paragraphs, I find his conclusion that the internet has completely rewired our brains a bit out there. Carr admits “...we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition”, thus I find it impossible to take Carr’s insistence that the Internet causing people to take up “power browsing” more often to be a sign of anything bigger (Carr). Carr’s skepticism about the at the thought of the internet supplementing our intelligence seems unjustified, as people have been supplementing their knowledge with that of other humans, books, and many other sources of information outside of the internet for generations. The fear that Carr expresses of becoming technology reliant is rather obsolete, as the world is simply shifting from print books to the same information in PDFs online. If Carr sees no issue with reading books to gain intelligence or information, there is no reason for him to fear technology when it is improving ways to do this and many other aspects of…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the media and internet slowly wearing away the knowledge that we had making us totally dependable on the objects put in front of us, or could computers and media be aiding us for the better? Nicholas Carr and Clive Thompson put these broad topics into perspective by forming different opinions going in different directions. One suggesting that the internet is making us smarter, developing our intellect and guiding us in the right direction to a more successful future? The other saying that we are losing our ability to think and learn on an efficient level as we use to.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Nicholas Carr’s essay, Is Google Making Us Stupid, he notes that the internet has clearly had negative impacts on the way we read, process thoughts, and even how we write. He argues that through the many years of being online, it has helped him with research and has allowed him to search through endless amounts of information in a short period of time, which would be otherwise impossible in a library. I agree that this is a sort of convenience that we all enjoy, especially myself, but it does hold issues we are only looking for related material for our works; and not for the sake of understanding of what we need to know. Also, is it almost impossible to read anything without wanting to get to the point instantaneously, and if not, we become somewhat unenthused and “fidgety.” But I did find that…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis For The Shallows

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. Essay Since the introduction of computers, they have served me for numerous purposes. In his book The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, Nicholas Carr suggests that even though the internet is an important tool, it is also a distraction causing users to be less attentive people.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you learn from the internet or lose your ability to concentrate, like Nicholas Carr found, all depends on how you use the internet. The honest answer is this, the internet has millions of articles for our picking, and to taste all of the fruit it offers would be unrealistic and ineffective. So naturally we have search engines, and social media, but if the user simply abuses this luxury of hyperlinks and easy-to-find information, typically their concentration will dwindle. The effectiveness of the World Wide Web will only reach her full potential if conservatively used, to allowing a mental informational database to grow. The internet attracts so many people because of its ability to jump through buckets of material in a timely fashion.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As technology develops, some people worry about the effects of those changes upon our society. Mr. Nicholas Carr, the author of “Is the Internet Making Us Dumber?” (Wall Street Journal) claims that the internet as a medium for information is having a detrimental effect upon the human brain and changing the way we think in a negative way. He claims that the internet has an excess of information and distractors that detract from our ability to focus, concentrate, and consolidate memory properly.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tom Nichols, author of The Death of Expertise, effectively conveys his view that the blatant excuses and mindsets of citizens made to ignore the experts of today can have negative impacts on the American culture, as well as touches on how it is impossible to continue this structure without disasters to follow (15). Nichols does this by giving examples of the characteristics of the people who are creating this influence, deeming them “explainers” to which a reader could relate to by thinking of examples in their own lives. (13). He also gives historic context of the problem throughout time to set a foundation of his argument while also touching on how the it has changed to the point where it becomes dangerous. Nichols argument especially becomes…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Carr (2010), reasoning has been fundamentally altered by the Internet into superficial thought processes through skimming, diversions, and facile learning. The research confirms that the ‘mental calisthenics’ involved in surfing the Internet, consequently puts even more of a strain on the brain, which then results in the lack of comprehension (Carr 2010, p. 3). For example, navigating Wikipedia, where there are numerous links to other sub-topics, have been found to considerably increase distractibility and oversimplified thinking because of the countless information the brain is inundated with, such as advertisements, formats, and others. In essence, screen technology through the loss of focus and depth of thought has radically changed cognition, which is pernicious to an intellectual…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although having his colleagues say they have been affected by the use of the Internet in the same manner as Carr, that does not give us evidence that the Internet is affecting the way we think. The evidence Carr provides ranges from quotes to case studies and a variety of sources, but primarily to solidify his claim. Maryanne Wolf in Carr’s article states is a developmental psychologist at Tufts University. Before introducing the evidences, he made sure the audience knew the credibility of the Wolf before stating a statement by Wolf. Wolf states that “the style of reading promoted by the Net, a style that puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above all else, may be weakening our capacity for the kind of deep reading that emerged when an earlier technology.”…

    • 1048 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays