One form of government that strongly supported the film was a totalitarian regime, which means “a form of government that controls all aspects of the political, social, and economic life of a nation” (Bardes, Shelly, & Schmidt, 2015-2016, p. 7). The fear that government played in this film was militant. The physical aspects of life in Libria was that it had no color (black and white), it had a militant atmosphere, “his” people had to live identical lives, and the society captured imprisonment. The emotional aspects of Libria was that it was emotionless. The people would think, but not know what the meaning felt. These were strict rules that each and every individual of that society had to live by. However, if one was to skip a dose and begin to feel. Then, that individual would have violated the law and be shot on sight. This militant ruler could be portrayed as Hitler because what he tried to stop was war and murder. However, DuPont was actually implementing everything that he was going against. Just like Hitler, DuPont was a hypocrite who contradicted what he stood
One form of government that strongly supported the film was a totalitarian regime, which means “a form of government that controls all aspects of the political, social, and economic life of a nation” (Bardes, Shelly, & Schmidt, 2015-2016, p. 7). The fear that government played in this film was militant. The physical aspects of life in Libria was that it had no color (black and white), it had a militant atmosphere, “his” people had to live identical lives, and the society captured imprisonment. The emotional aspects of Libria was that it was emotionless. The people would think, but not know what the meaning felt. These were strict rules that each and every individual of that society had to live by. However, if one was to skip a dose and begin to feel. Then, that individual would have violated the law and be shot on sight. This militant ruler could be portrayed as Hitler because what he tried to stop was war and murder. However, DuPont was actually implementing everything that he was going against. Just like Hitler, DuPont was a hypocrite who contradicted what he stood