Thomson's Arguments Against Abortion

Improved Essays
The main argument on the issue of abortion has generally come down to a difference over when we ought to envision the original position decision to happen: right now of achieving enough development to really comprehend one's wants, right now of birth, right now of origination, or even before origination (Rawls, 2005). An original position at birth consequently yields an expert decision position, since one has no risk of being aborted; an original position prompts a similar result with the likelihood of even abortion being permissible. On the other hand, an original position at origination generally prompts a substantially better life outcome. Thomson rejects the claim that pregnant women have a right to murder their posterity. She contends for the right of the mother to quit being pregnant, regardless of the possibility that this results in the end of life. In the event that, for instance, a late-term premature birth unintentionally brings about the birth of a living child, at that point Thomson suggests that the mother has no right to remove the fetus. …show more content…
The situation is especially similar to the celebrated soccer situation; we are grabbed and joined to an acclaimed violinist with a lethal kidney issue, whose survival relies upon his remaining connected to our circulatory framework. The violinist has a right to life (and this could possibly infer that no outsider has a right to unplug the violinist), Thomson trusts we would concur, he doesn't have a right to the utilization of our body and consequently we have a right to unplug ourselves. Thomson (1971) suggests that a fetus is protected by implication in morality of the pregnant woman's obligation to respect life. The obligation of mutual respect is a positive obligation since it is an obligation to accomplish something useful for a fetus; yet the obligation not to harm others is a negative obligation since it requires us not to accomplish something that is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    (Robertson and Schulman, p. 752). The rights of the mother should not completely be diminished because of the child’s welfare. Yet, the fetus has the right to be born healthy. We have to respect the mother’s wishes, but also the fetus’s wishes to remain healthy. Also, Minkoff and Paltrow have opinions about pregnancy and prenatal harm.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is Noonan 's "Argument from Probabilities?" How does this argument work, and what does he think it implies about the morality or immorality of abortion? The argument from probabilities is not aimed at establishing an objective discontinuity which may be taken into account in moral disclosure.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the essay “Why Abortion is Immoral,” philosopher Don Marquis uses utilitarian principles to argue that “abortion is, except in rare cases, seriously immoral… [and] in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (223). However, he deliberately avoids relating his thesis to abortion in the specific contexts of rape, maternal death, and severe postpartum health complications. Thus, in my analysis of his claim, I plan on adopting Marquis’ utilitarian perspective to evaluate the permissibility of abortion in regard to these delicate scenarios. I will begin my paper by giving a brief summary of “Why Abortion is Immoral.”…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, Thomson also says that in situations in which a parent has chosen to assume responsibility for a child, it is their obligation to follow through and take care of the child. This is where Thomson draws the line on whether or not abortion is ethical. If the…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first will be the violinist and other person, and her text, the pronoun “you” is representing the mother, the violinist is the fetus, and unplugging is the act of abortion. Per the textbook, “Everyone has a right to life, so the unborn person has a right to life” (Page.178). The analogy involves a third party telling you that it if you don’t stay connected to the famous violinist’s kidneys, then he will die. They tell you, “yes, we kidnapped you, but your kidneys need to stay connected to the violinist for him to live.” It is up to you to stay connected and help the violinist survive, or you can say, “nope, unplug me.”…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every unborn child should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the second and third trimester. In 2010, research shows that states indicated that unborn children are considered humans under tort, property and criminal law (Roden, 2010). By these laws shown, a mother shouldn’t get to choose whether the fetus lives or dies. The unborn child is its own person and by a mother aborting her own child should be considered murder. Under law a child is supposed to be born for many different reasons, including being capable of having a legacy (Roden, 2010).…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the semester finally comes to an end and I have time to truly reflect on what I have learned so far I find that my stance on abortion has actually become a bit more muddled. I do not view this as a negative simply because it has allowed me to better understand not only both sides to the argument, but question if I am making the morally correct decision and not just the emotional one. My biggest take away would most definitely be the ability to compare and contrast multiple viewpoints in the argument for abortion. I never considered the fact that the status of the fetus could in fact be irrelevant to morality up until this semester. This Ethics course is something everyone should be required to take in higher education, as it forces people…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson also says that allowing someone to use your body is different from them having the right to. When the violinist was attached to her she never gave him the right to use her body but say may see it as a moral obligation to allow him to use her body. For anyone to see what that truly feels like they would need to be put in that situation but overall it would be an internal conflict between morally doing what is right and what you would want for yourself. It would either be you choosing the “right” thing to do or everyone being mad at you for choosing what is best for you and your baby, or in that case what is right for the violinist.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Thomson addresses John Paul II’s missed premise about the content to the right to life, leads his argument to be an invalid conclusion. She also touches upon and disagrees that the fetus’s rights outweigh that of the mother whereas Paul II believes otherwise. Warren chooses to elaborate Thomson's objections with the argument of what constitutes as person, and personhood, with the five traits that a fetus does not satisfy. Thus, according to these counterarguments the traditional argument loses its validity; leading to my own conclusion that the argument is invalid. References: Thomson, J. (1971).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are known for having sympathetic feelings to a child who is visible over the unborn fetus. However, pro-life activists hold that emotions that cannot form a basis for justifying birth. With the fetus being born or not being born; the fetus does have a chance in becoming a full human being. Viability of a fetus to survive outside the womb independently is when the fetus is able to get that ‘full human being’ status. Abortion also raises ethical issues of character.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays