The Corruption Of The Judicial System In Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

Improved Essays
In a country like the United States the power of the government is divided among three branches; the legislature, the Judiciary and the executive. Out of the three, the Judiciary branch is responsible for interpreting and applying the laws made by the government. Our Judicial system comprises of courts that administer justice in the name of the state. The Judiciary is meant to ensure equal justice under the law, but the poor and minorities groups seem to suffer in our judicial system. As mentioned in the book, Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson, minorities mostly suffer due to injustices like racial profiling and flexible sentencing. Many people argue that injustice occurs due to corrupt police and dishonest judges, and they are the ones responsible …show more content…
Stevenson also claims that the people who faced these punishments were minorities. Most of these events occurred due to the corrupt government. The government is corrupt however, it is the people who are corrupting it. Most of these events occurred during the time when minority groups didn’t have the right to vote. For this the government and the justice system were in favor of the majority. “You see this scar on the top of my head?” He tilted his head to show me. “I got that scar in Greene County, Alabama trying to register to vote in 1964.”(Stevenson, 46), says an old African American man Stevenson met while giving a speech. All this happened due to the officials elected by the majority. So in a way it is the people who are responsible for corrupting the justice system. Citizens do not elect judges, make or interpret laws; however they have a very important role in the shape of the justice system. People play an indirect role in forming the justice system by electing members of legislature and executive branches who can check on the Judiciary. Hence, the people also have a huge impact on the Judiciary just like the other …show more content…
Judiciary also includes police, lawyers, and officials associated with law and order. One corrupt official can corrupt the entire justice system. In the book, Stevenson also talks about a lot of people falsely convicted due to corrupt police and lawyers. One of them is Walter McMillian. “His story was a counter narrative to the rhetoric of fairness and reliability offered by politicians and law enforcement officials who wanted more and faster executions. Walter’s case complicated the debate in very graphic ways”(Stevenson,243). Although Walter did not commit the crime, there were three witnesses against him for which he was sentenced to death. It is the police and lawyers who were responsible for the injustice Walter faced. Just like Walter, the other people mentioned in the book also faced injustice mostly due officials, other than the Judiciary being corrupt. For example, Marsha Colby and Diane Jones got convicted for crimes they didn’t commit . It is all due to the corrupt law enforcement. Just like judges, the also responsible for corrupt police and law enforcement. People can ensure justice by ensuring honest law-enforcement

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The lawyer failed to bring up his past and Herbert was guilty by an all-white jury. Stevenson goes to meet Herbert, his family and his new wife on the day of his execution. The most powerful part of this chapter was when he describes Herbert’s wife and family pulling away as they hum the church hymn. In Chapter 5, Stevenson meets with Walter’s family and his sister says that she feels “convicted too”. This is important because it shows that just not only is Walter effected by his own incarceration but his entire family and Black community is as well.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foster v. Chatman Late 1980s a young man named Timothy Tyrone Foster, age 18 black African-Americans was charged with the murder of a white elderly woman named Queen White. During the court-martial, the persecuting attorney decided to use his Peremptory Strikes to remove all four black jurors. The prosecutor violates the race-neutral acts, the members of the jury pool used extreme strategy against the race matching of the defendant. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Batson v. Kentucky, it does not let to use an unconditional attack that defines as a racial discrimination, but they remove any burden they may affect the case so they can give him a fair trial by using legal racially biased jury selection method. At the end, Tyrone Foster was sentenced to the death penalty for the murder he convicted by all the white jury.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the book, Just Mercy, the encounters Bryan Stevenson had with inmates was eye-opening to me. When one looks at the criminal justice system as a whole, every person convicted of their crime is looked upon as rightfully guilty. After reading, Just Mercy, that is clearly not the case. There are many people put into jail or even death row for crimes they did not even commit. The case with Walter McMillian is a perfect example of this.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court does not possess the appropriate tools to implement their decisions. Courts cannot actively seek out appellants, appellants have to seek courts in order for their claims to be heard. The courts are described as the least dangerous branch of the government because the judiciary lacks the “influence over either the sword or the purse” (Rosenberg, 15). If the courts lack the political and elite support, the court’s decision will not be effective in its implementation; therefore, the decision will hold no power. Rosenberg argues that even if courts are characterized as producers of social change, it is a mere illusion.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson depicted clearly the unfair ways the poor and the incarnated were treated in the criminal justice system. Stevenson educated his readers about the death penalty, women’s prison, and youth being tried as adult in the criminal system without being to overwhelm and factual. Another way Stevenson brought his novel to life is through his characters. Bryan Stevenson makes you feel every emotion his character went through; it was as if we went through every tribulation the characters had to endure. Stevenson also made his audience experience every joy and heartbreak that he went through as their defendant’s lawyer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Flaws Within the Justice System Are the laws of the justice system bias or fair to all citizens? In the movie Law Abiding Citizen a man named Clyde Shelton lost his wife and daughter in a home invasion. A district attorney named Nick Rice made a deal with Darby, who committed the crime all he had to do was confess to the crime and he would receive the minimum sentencing. Darby’s partner, Aimes was in shock by what was taking place, but he received the harsher sentencing.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death is something all humans have in common. Everyone dies, some sooner than others, some naturally, some by accident, and others have their lives taken from them. Death is a subject that permeates Bryan Stevenson’s memoir ¬Just Mercy completely. In the book, Stevenson recounts his early days as a lawyer in the southern United States. He becomes intrigued with the cases that involve death sentences and makes it his goal to fight for those who are wrongly accused and sentenced to death.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Politics have played a significant role when determining how White America views the black race as a whole. Over the years people have characterized and associated blacks as the criminals and predators of society. They relate blacks to drugs, violence, and crimes. As a result, they enslave and incarcerate blacks. They use their Machiavellian justice system and laws created by them to eliminate or impoverish the black race in the white society.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system does not give proper and fair treatment of justice for people of color. The justice system promises equality for all people regardless of their race, skin color or financial status. The system is flawed because it is unbiased toward people who have white privilege. Although some people may believe that white privilege does not exist, people of color still experience racism when it comes to justice.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whitlach's Case Analysis

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maintaining a fair police force is a key component of maintaining a fair justice…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . “America incarcerates more people than any other country on Earth,” argues Shane Smith. Seventy-five percent of people arrested for nonviolent drug charges are blacks and Hispanics. For minorities the system is broken because the system is biased to them. The justice system is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but for Latinos and blacks the system is guilty until proven innocent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Judicial power is the power to interpret the law. It is exercised by the judiciary, that is, the system of courts. In some countries the power of the judiciary is limited to interpretation of the law made by legislature, while in Australia and other common law legal systems the judiciary plays a more active role in the creation of law of the doctrine of precedent. Hence, one arm of government should not control or interfere or exercise a function of another arm. (James N., Business Law, 3rd Ed,…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays