The Most Dangerous Game Conflict Analysis

Improved Essays
A myriad of literary devices is incorporated into The Most Dangerous Game in order to create the story. One of the most noteworthy relationships I noticed between devices was the setting, conflict, and structure. In the Most Dangerous game, the conflict would not be feasible without the setting. The setting and the conflict both contribute to the cat and mouse structure that is set up throughout the short story. Saki intricately weaves the setting, conflict, and structure together while using their synergy to create the essence of the story.
The story takes place in the 1920’s on a remote island, The island is essential for the development of conflict since the conflict involves the clash between two hunters during a game of outdoor chess. On the island, there is a jungle in which Zaroff challenges Rainsford to hide in and be hunted by Zaroff. Without this island on which Rainsford swam to, there would be no opportunity for Zaroff to hunt Rainsford and get away with it. When Zaroff is challenging Rainsford he says, "You'll find this game worth playing," the general said
…show more content…
In the 1920s hunting was the white man’s sport which caused the characters to be hunters and be pitted against one another. Also, because the island is Zaroff’s, he was set up to be the cat and his challenge which was a part of the conflict set Rainsford up as the mouse and the story was written in a manner that displayed these roles. This structure is referred to by the narrator when they say, “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day's sport! The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” This quote shows how the conflict between the two hunters establishes the cat and mouse chase and the island cause Zaroff to have an advantage over Rainsford as the cat and further develops the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Most Dangerous Game; Conflicts of Story Writing Some people ask what makes a story so good. Well, the answer is conflicts. Conflicts give the story a purpose; a thrill of action. The best stories have all three conflicts, man versus man, man versus self, and man versus nature. The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell has all three conflicts of story writing in its 14 pages. The three conflicts make stories have adventure. Even in the most boring books ever, there is a conflict giving it a purpose…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Literary Analysis Collection 1 In collection one of the class text book there were some great stories, but the top three stories must go to The Sniper, The Most Dangerous Game and Harrison Bergeron. This literary analysis will be comparing the stories character, conflict, and setting. In the stories, the character has a lot of differences but also have a lot of similarities. The difference between the stories is what the character are fighting for, the stories characters is fighting for them self…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Residences in Belize City are concern with the spike of violence seen escalating recently. Our older population who have lived most if not all there live in this once peaceful jewel often express there observation of how the gangs are turning this city into one of the most violent country in the Central America and the world. “ Belize is officially the sixth most dangerous country in the world with an average of just over 39 homicides per 100,000 residences (Belize 2012 Crime and Safety Report 2012)…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays