He didn’t want to take part in the hunt, but he knew he had to do whatever it took to defeat Zaroff because he didn’t want to die such a shameful death, but more importantly, beat Zaroff at his own game. Trying to maintain his civility, Rainsford had to play Zaroff’s game in order to survive. This conflict between man versus man was very tense. Both men wanted to deem themselves as the ultimate hunter and did whatever they could to win the hunt. Coming from two men sitting at the dinner table eating, now, to two men in the jungle trying to kill each other is very dramatic and illustrates the overwhelming conflict between man versus man in “The Most Dangerous Game.” Sitting in a tree waiting for Zaroff to expose himself, suddenly he spotted Zaroff walking through the jungle. Becoming more and more anxious by the second, Rainsford realized that Zaroff was right below him. Trying to lay as still as possible so he wouldn’t get spotted, Zaroff began to scan tree and suddenly, looked up at him and had a huge smile take over his face. “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day’s sport!” (12) This irritated Rainsford immensely, he couldn’t stay focused and felt very uncomfortable not knowing where Zaroff was or what he would do next. Rainsford has to battle this throughout the story and had to ensure he was a step ahead of …show more content…
Not only did conflict start from the very beginning with Zaroff appearing to be someone he wasn’t, conflict was illustrated in a bizarre and unique way most readers wouldn’t expect. Most readers reading this story wouldn’t predict this kind of outcome. This makes it very interesting and fun to read. Not only does conflict serve as a way to entertain readers, but it can also teach valuable lessons. “The Most Dangerous Game” was able to leave its readers with a powerful reminder that conflict lurks everywhere and can strike at any given moment, even when it’s least