Net Neutrality

Improved Essays
Net neutrality is a term coined by Tim Wu who was a media law professor at Columbia University, This sentence makes no sense, it is the belief that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It became a big deal when in 2007, Comcast was intentionally slowing uploads from “peer to peer file sharing applications.” And they were basically trying to implement limits and differentiate charges for peer to peer, file transfer protocol, and online traffic. The big problem that arose from this is that other internet providers tried charging for data usage for people visiting what is considered to be “High Traffic sites” “Wu, 24 April 2014”. In the case of Verizon Communication Inc. v. Fec 2014, Verizon wanted to go to court for the ability to be able to charge users a premium for visiting the “High Traffic Sites” which they claimed used up to much bandwidth. In the ruling punctuation the courts stated that the FCC did not have authority to regulate broadband providers as per the FCC’s own open internet order. The reason being is, “Because the FCC had previously classified broadband providers under the Title I Act of the Communications Act of 1934, the court ruled that the FCC relinquished its right to regulate them who is “them”? Like common carrier” and with this ruling it can be assumed that internet providers will never be able to charge extra for visiting said sites. VERIZON (14 jan 2014). Additionally it 's controversial because the biggest question is who would be in control? A quote that really sums up internet is by Clay Shirky and it 's entitled “The internet is not a public sphere. It’s a private sphere that tolerates public speech” and this is says that if internet were to be regulated it wouldn’t be by the provider but by the wealthy 1% of the world 's population. How Internet Censorship Works (4 December 2012). That backs up the Elitist Theory which is says that American politics is best understood through the generalization that nearly all political power is held by a relatively small and wealthy group of people sharing similar values and interests and mostly coming from relatively similar privileged backgrounds ( Auburn 2015). Their (In Italy!) has been an attempt at establishing an internet Bill of Rights that would establish basic principles as to what people 's basic rights on the internet are. Currently this is in the draft stage and is in the review process by several people in positions of power because they want this to be as open as possible as well as being direct . They don 't want any issues of what a particular part could be about because what was put was I don’t understand really vague or something of that The liberal Point of view on the issue is that 81% of them oppose fast lanes. This poll had an error of margin of 3-2%. The poll indicated that people are most likely to support net neutrality as they learn more about it. Among those who said they’d “heard a lot” about the issue 1 in 10 surveyed that 56% strongly opposed the fast …show more content…
The numbers showed that 8 out of 10 people or about 80% of people agreed that the broadband concept that web providers should not be allowed to block, slow down or discriminate against online traffic though it didn 't get into the regulatory structure. Hattem Julian, Feb 2015. So, is it something that could become a thing with the support from public people? Of course not, Is this an attempt at providers trying to get more money in a way that is in no way seen as an act that was well thought out? yes it is. So is this something that will go into effect?

In summation Net neutrality is the belief that all internet traffic should be treated equally, this became a problem when internet providers tried to charge a premium for usage of data to high traffic sites. From the political perspective the democrats are in favor for internet equality but the republicans oppose them believing that having people pay for it helps in several ways. This ultimately isn 't something that will end up going into effect is there a way to make a strong summary without restating the very facts already

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Network Neutrality Nuances, Barbara van Schewick argues her stance on network neutrality, and how without it we would be under the relentless abuse of our ISPs. By utilizing a multitude of examples and propositions, she manages to engross the reader in a series of possibilities of what could occur without network neutrality, and how it acts as a measure against discrimination Barbara starts off her point of view by firmly introducing us into net neutrality, and how it is basically the wall that stops a digital divide. Focusing on 3 subjects in specific, the piece introduces the reader to why we should worry about network neutrality, the incentives ISPs have to do it and why arguments against net neutrality are invalid. Barbara very convincingly…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example: to use Netflix, Facebook, or Youtube and these apps will charge monthly fees instead of paying one internet provider for net neutrality. Net neutrality changes the way the internet is used either for good or…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a set of rules that would make sure the internet would remain an open and free place. This issue was sparked up when it was discovered that Internet Broadband Providers (ISPs) had the ability to manipulate data as they saw fit for their own profit. In order to uphold the policies that help keep the average person’s data out of their ISP’s hands, a presidential candidate who supports net neutrality must be elected. Bernie Sanders is the best candidate to defend net neutrality because he's against corporate control, spying on American citizens, and supports the FCC's regulations. The internet has become an integral part of American educational, business, and recreational life.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy around net neutrality is pretty common, many think the government shouldn’t be wanting the people to be paying so much for something that everyone uses in their everyday life for useful purposes, while the other portion aren’t aware of net neutrality and or they simply do not care. Net neutrality limits people from seeing what is fully out there which can potentially be a good idea or one of the worst ones yet. Paying for such a thing, and paying a good price and not getting what you fully pay for is frustrating yet calming. The government is wanting to protect the general population from seeing something most have most likely seen, knowing what is out there in the world is one of the most asked questions.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of us probably believe we have absolute freedom when it comes to what we view on the internet. However, Barbara van Schewick points out in her article ‘Network Neutrality Nuances’, that we only have access to bits and pieces of the internet (Schewick, 2009). What we are able to view is all decided upon by our ISP. Schewick states that ISPs select what we view in order to maximize profits, to ban content which they consider to be inappropriate, or to keep track of all signals on their network (Schewick, 2009). She does an excellent job of explaining why this is wrong by bringing forth real world examples, using thought-provoking literary devices, as well as by connecting with the reader (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Net neutrality allows citizens the right to access the same content as everyone else without blocking or slowing down that citizen’s bandwidth.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the mockumentary, “Leaked: The Internet Must Go”, a market researcher, John Wooley, was hired by Internet service providers (ISP) to do market research and talk to people to help them sell their new vision; eliminating net neutrality to reach maximum profit potential. Over many years, ISP has spent billions of dollars to build towers that bring Americans the Internet. However, they believe that there is too much traffic. Their solution to this problem is the “Internet must go”. ISP wanted to create innovative new ways to charge Internet users for the sites they want; however, the only thing stopping them is net neutrality and keeping the Internet open.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to know that This rule does not stop providers from offering subscribers tiers of services or charging based on usage. Mobile, this requires transparency of mobile broadband providers and stopping them from blocking websites and certain competitive apps. Vigilance, this created an Open Internet Advisory Committee that assists the FCC in monitoring Internet openness and the effects of the…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Good morning Mrs. Facciolo and classmates, today I'm going to talk to you about net neutrality, more specifically; what it is, what's happening to it now, and why you should care. Let's get into it. Net neutrality is the idea that internet service providers shouldn't be allowed to unfairly treat or grant special treatment to particular sites and apps. Under the current net neutrality rules, broadband and wireless providers like Rogers and Bell, can't block or slow down your access to lawful content, nor can they make "fast lanes" for content providers who are willing to pay extra. In other words, your internet provider can't slow your video stream so you'll keep your cable plan, and your mobile carrier can't stop you from using video chat instead of your own cell phone minutes.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This time, the question centered on the infrastructure used to deliver internet service and whether or not broadband companies should be forced to allow other providers to utilize their infrastructure. The FCC chairman at the time, Michael Powell, decided to classify broadband providers as an information service rather than grouping them with telephone companies as telephone services. The decision provided broadband companies protections from the rules that govern telephone…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone in this room uses the internet, probably daily, but many of you may not realise a threat which could harm the way our internet works, net neutrality intends to protect us consumers from the threats. Net Neutrality is often mistaken to be related to censorship, or other seemingly unethical act, that's just a small part, the idea of Net Neutrality is, in a nutshell, that all data carried over the internet should be treated equally. This means that any organisation, government or corporate, cannot control the way data is shared. You should be able to access Youtube, Facebook, and all your favourite websites at the same speed as fast your Internet offers.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Net neutrality is an issue that was brought up in the news three months ago when the government revoked it. Net neutrality is a very complicated thing and not many people actually know what it means. Net neutrality is where the government forces internet providers to give all websites the same speeds. That allows startup tech companies to use the same speeds as Facebook and Google. According to the ACLU, without net neutrality there will be two tiers of the internet.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main idea is that individual users should be in charge of the content and apps they use on the internet and that the local internet providers should not restrict their use. The internet is unique with how it allows equal access and participation for all users without a sing entity regulating content (Fieser). Traditional media outlets all have strict editorial policies that restrict their content based on political interest, controversy, ideology, space limitations, and other innumerable factors. The internet is most likely the only major media outlet that doesn’t require going through such editorial scrutiny (Fieser). Defenders of internet neutrality work to preserve this freedom from restriction.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communications Act is a law that has an impact not only on those subjected to its authority but also on the development of future technologies and the greater social order. 82 years after its enactment, the Communications Act is at the center of a controversy seemingly unforeseeable in 1934, Net Neutrality. An open Internet, or Net Neutrality, is possible due to regulations of the Communications Act…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of net neutrality, an Obama-era regulation that prohibits internet service providers from speeding up, slowing down or blocking any content, applications or websites you want to use, according to freepress.net, is a necessary rule that will keep citizens free and private and keep the internet neutral, hence the name. The law is necessary because without regulations, large corporations can monitor what we see on the internet, and there will be no way for us to know what is real and what is not. There will be no truth or freedom of press except what multinational, billionaire corporations want us to…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays