Summary: The Insider Threat Program

Improved Essays
In 2011, President Obama has issued an executive order for the Insider Threat Program. This program prohibits executive government officials who have knowledge of national security matter from speaking to the press without prior authorization first. After Snowden 's release of leaked documents, the Insider Threat Program became more intense. Government officials are no longer allowed to speak to the press about unclassified matters, such as their own personal opinions about current events. In the past, journalists could keep their government sources secret so that they would not have to face punishment. However, that is impossible for journalists to do nowadays because of the magnitude of NSA 's programs. The NSA can quickly pinpoint journalist …show more content…
These programs are doing damage to the values the United States claims to hold most dear - freedom of expression, freedom of press and the right to counsel. However, the secrecy of the programs is creating even more uncertainty that leaves journalist 's and sources confused on what the rules and regulations of The Program really are. This uncertainty has created what is being referred to as "surveillance-induced chill" in reporter-source relationships. President Obama has attempted to clarify the limits of NSA programs in speeches but whenever he tries to clear things up, he purposely uses vague language that leaves reporters more confused than they were …show more content…
No changes have actually occurred since either of the leaks in 2005 and again in 2013. Even though there has not been significant change in the government does not mean that this has gone unnoticed. By telling American 's the truth of the programs, we now can take as many precautions as we feel is necessary. Some people make sure to check the boxes in their browser 's privacy settings to not allow websites to track them, some people disabled the GPS in their phones and others are finding their own way to prevent the government from tracking them. The biggest impact has been on journalists who are struggling to report truthful and accurate stories about government. This is because the government is still funding these programs that violate the first amendment in the Bill of Rights by using extensive surveillance techniques. Until the government is held accountable for taking away the first right granted to all US citizens, nobody will be able to trust the true motives of the United States

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At what point is searching through people’s information enough? Or should the NSA have more rights looking into people’s whereabouts to provide safety of the United States. The reason why this act is causing so much conflict is because in some opinions it’s violating the first and fourth amendment of the constitution, but in others opinions it’s providing us safety and isn’t violating the constitution. The reason why they may never be able to have a compromise is because they may never be able to choose between what matters most, freedom or safety, and that is why this issue is extremely…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America has also managed to lose the trust of perhaps its only real friend in the middle east: Israel. President Obama’s negative remarks toward Prime Minister Netanyahu have been very negative and distrusting, therefore causing a great divide in the existing trust between these nations. The level of trust must be restored and the first step in restoring that trust is for America to stop spying on innocent people and countries. Not only is there no point, but this only instigates a hostile country further to do something wrong since…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Senator Richard Burr says, “We are on the floor today talking about taking away some of the tools that have been effective in helping us thwart attacks. It is the wrong debate to have” (“Pros and Cons”). Security and stability in life come with the appropriate protections and preparations. Allowing surveillance to provide security to the country will save people from having to worry about major terrorist attacks, such as 9/11, from happening again. Also, technology is advancing in every part of the world, so it would be a waste not to make use of the resources under America’s possession, especially when every other country could be using it against American citizens.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kick The Habit Essay

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But if the person is free from any criminal record, then the employer mustn’t interfere with his personal information. You want security? Well, we do as well! But along with security, we need to be reassured that our personal privacy is secure. Governments around the world are failing to keep people’s privacy since they do not keep the data they have confidential, they use social networks to invade people’s privacy doing so without informing them about it, and the whole process of privacy invasion hasn’t proved to be totally efficient in most countries.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many users on the internet distrust communication, sharing, and storing in fear of government surveillance. Many cannot express their will freely because they are aware the government will be supervising their data. If people know that there is a government data base that records information and stores every search or call, this poses a chilling effect for their free speech. The large amounts of data removes a person’s ability to move on from past experiences if it can be recalled (Schneier 2015). The 3rd amendment has been interpreted by courts that there would be privacy of the home; there is no privacy because individuals are constantly monitored.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Snowden should not be jailed. The US government wants Edward Snowden punished for leaking government secrets to the press. Edward Snowden used his right of “freedom of press” guaranteed by First Amendment to show US citizens that their rights were being violated by their own government who is collecting their information without warrants. American would have never known the truth without Snowden’s heroic…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most important of all, the real spy in this entire mess is the government. The only way we can move forward with this is to fight for our rights and regulations to not only exist, but to work not for one, not for some, but for all. The current system is not working for whistleblowing, it’s quite the opposite. It scares people to come forward because they may become the target instead of the victim or…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’” (44) The consequences of the government having this much control of the media is revealed in the book. It is extremely corrupt. Those who refuse to believe and conform to the Inner Party’s version of history are tortured until they cannot tolerate anymore. The government should not have this much power because it will lead to an immense amount of…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another example why many people do not accept surveillance is because it has also affect the people by causing discrimination against one another. Greenwald also states “Some of the surveillance was ostensibly devoted to terrorism suspects. But great quantities of the program manifestation have nothing to do with national security.” (94) In this quote Greenwald says that many of the programs have nothing to do with national security because they don’t just see the information or everything there surveillance is capturing the government is saving everything not for a day nor a week but for years and this is information that they don’t need to have. Greenwald also sates “Taken in its entirely, the Snowden archive led to an ultimately simple conclusion: the US government has built a system that has as its goals the complete elimination of electronic privacy worldwide.”(94) The government is taking away the privacy of every individual by checking everyone’s cell phones emails and…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays