4th Amendment Right To Privacy

Improved Essays
There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. (Text 1.1, Lines 1-2).” What the text is saying is that, people cannot be searched randomly …show more content…
Not only are they avoiding the probable cause part, but they are rummaging through everyone 's private lives without warrants. As stated in Text 1.2, Paragraph 13, “...police often do not need to show probable cause of a crime when the want to find out details about your life that they used to find in your home. Instead, they can get your private files from corporations that store your records on their computers.” This is completely absurd in the fact that in literally is said in the constitution that the government cannot search or seize any of the peoples documents without a warrant. Although second parties may claim that, since “.. the Supreme Court and other courts have issued a series of rulings declaring that the government does not need a search warrant to obtain personal documents if you have already shared them with someone else.(Text 1.2, Paragraph 10” What is the definition of shared though? Apparently if people save a document of the computer, or post/comment something online, that statement is no longer the people 's. The company who the people gave the statement too owns it, and it is considered public information. By this standard, if innocent people show a document to their spouse, it is now considered shared, and is public information. Technically if the government wanted to show that this was the correct thing to do and shared information is …show more content…
They have created “secret programs” to help survey the citizens of the United States. When asked how many people the government was surveying, the government responded with, “it’d be against their privacy policy to inform the people of that.” The government should at least be able to inform the people it serves how many of its citizens internet traffic they go through on a day to day basis, there 's nothing secret about an approximate number. In Text 4.1, Paragraph 9 Mike Rogers said, “It is much easier for terrorists to hide from us if they understand the methods of our intelligence gathering.” But how would just supplying a number of people being surveyed change the way terrorists acted? It is completely irrational if they expect the people to believe everything that they say and never question any of it. That 's why the people should have more of a direct say in how the government. It is the way their lives are run and if they are unhappy about it, do something to change it. It was what this country was founded on. A people unhappy with the way they were run so they did whatever was necessary to achieve the way they wanted to run their own lives. Its hoped that it doesn 't cause a war, that 's not what being said, but the American people do need to stop rolling with the punches and take a stand for their own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Of Free Speech

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is protected by the first amendment to the constitution. With secrets kept from the public, it is possible to keep the citizens unaware of troubling matters that may otherwise harm their daily lives with the knowledge of it. Abraham Lincoln expressed his views as “Let the people be aware of the facts, and the country will be calm”, but, by knowing all the facts, is it possible that the populace would have been better off not knowing some aspects of truth? When threats to national security and the lives of many humans appear, the public is notified almost instantly within the timeframe of the announcement where as when the U.S. government is spying on its citizens, although illegal, they refuse to disclose the information and it may not be because it needs to be classified, but because it could be embarrassing if it was released from the government. Mills argued in On Liberty “...there ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered.” In a democratic society, freedom of speech plays an important role.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is privacy a right that all should have. Many think that we have a right to privacy that is upheld by many Supreme Court rulings, and that we should protect your privacy digitally like your phone and computer, as well as your physical privacy. While others think they only that we shouldn’t have digital privacy from the government because they have nothing they want to hide. They also argue that even if you had a right to privacy you couldn’t have true privacy in today’s world. To give some background on what the constitution says on privacy.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kick The Habit Essay

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But if the person is free from any criminal record, then the employer mustn’t interfere with his personal information. You want security? Well, we do as well! But along with security, we need to be reassured that our personal privacy is secure. Governments around the world are failing to keep people’s privacy since they do not keep the data they have confidential, they use social networks to invade people’s privacy doing so without informing them about it, and the whole process of privacy invasion hasn’t proved to be totally efficient in most countries.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But if you do ditch school or work why doesn’t the government come and get you at your house or where you are at? People do not know if they can be watched by the government. The truth is you are whenever you are out in public and the cameras are monitored by police departments for speeding cars, and robberies. But the cameras around the stores or banks are private cameras and the only way into the cameras is if they are actually inside their security room and you can only get that for an active…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some have put their own privacy at the top, while others put the safety of our nation above individual privacy. Are a couple iPhones an adequate price to pay for the safety of all Americans against terrorist organizations? This device would not breach the privacy of all Americans. The iPhone’s lack of data retrievability would also be a selling point to terrorists who would like to be as incognito to the government as possible. Apple is directly defying numerous court orders that require them to create the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Computers are a valuable tool, but they are not a filing cabinet. The opposition is not just a couple people in the U.S. however, nearly every American that owns a computer has at least some personal information stored in their non-trusty computers. We need to realize we do not possess the technology to keep these hackers out of our beeswax. The only way to stop our information from being stolen is to remove it from your computer, because once it is in there it is gone in a blink of an…

    • 1796 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before i get into who does benefit from the 4th amendment being updated. Let's talk about who doesn't which is our counties task force the police.The police does not benefit from the fourth amendment change because it changes their ways of searching and investigating someone convicted of a pellinay. As it was said by the article” Supreme Court Rules You Have No 4th Amendment Protection Against Cops Ignorant of the Law” as says…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No changes have actually occurred since either of the leaks in 2005 and again in 2013. Even though there has not been significant change in the government does not mean that this has gone unnoticed. By telling American 's the truth of the programs, we now can take as many precautions as we feel is necessary. Some people make sure to check the boxes in their browser 's privacy settings to not allow websites to track them, some people disabled the GPS in their phones and others are finding their own way to prevent the government from tracking them. The biggest impact has been on journalists who are struggling to report truthful and accurate stories about government.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The big problem many people have with it is the lack of privacy. “Should we believe that under Net Neutrality the government will trust the telecoms to police themselves?” (Josh Steimle, Forbes) Because the internet is open so people can’t control the people that view their information. This makes it so hackers and ordinary people can access private information. Yes that is a problem with net neutrality but there are ways to prevent it. Many websites provide ways to keep your information private and so only the people you want can see it.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They do agree that this can help prevent terrorism. Yes this may be a great way to protect everyone but the government should have a limit; there is no reason why they should be saving all the data they encounter. The government should not be checking our phone calls or our credit cards bill this is a violation of the fourth amendment. The civil right was made to protect every individual from higher position abuse for example government, police, or even the president. Some surveillance may protect the state but the government should not be able to store this information with out the people having consent about it.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays