I would probably find a respected colleague to discuss my finding and conclusions with, to ensure that I have considered all avenues and not missed any obvious or subtle details. I would review the aim and objectives of the project and evaluate my analysis and conclusions against them, ensuring that I have answered the questions posed and provided the necessary information for senior management to make the decisions they were anticipating making. If I am unable to do so, I would consider why and how this matter can be resolved – maybe propose further research or explain why the research failed to meet its …show more content…
There are a number of methods e.g. meetings, memos, presentations, reports, consultations etc. It is likely that a combination of methods will be required and this will need to be considered in view of the nature of the project and those involved. In the scenario of moving the glasshouse, I would circulate written reports with attached scientific support material, for prior consideration. I would then hold site visits, where the details of the reports can be discussed within the physical context of the proposed changes and follow this up with a formal meeting and dinner. My rational for this is: (a) farmers are extremely busy and need time to read and process information around their schedules (b) farmers like to see and experience things for themselves (c) they then like to discuss the options frankly and thoroughly and finally (d) they love food and the provision of a good meal goes a long way to impress them – it is also a practical measure as they will often need to travel immediately after