Thanks for your post. Basically, you did a good job, and blow is my feedback:
1. What did you like about the materials posted?
As a project asked to be finished in 24 months within a cost of 12.5 milliion dollars, you organize your WBS quite well. There are more than 100 activities listed in you WBS, and the high level deliverables nearly mention all of the project objectives. The environment impact report is very appreciated, as the project sponsor asks you to make a environment-friendly project.
2. What questions do you have about what the team did and why they did it?
I am still confused about that how the lobor cost of the project team and the design team could be $17 per hour and $25 per hour?
3. Are there any threats/weaknesses …show more content…
However, you should pay attention to the space between words.eg: the space before the word Email is missing in the row, "Ben Harvey", in the communication plan.
5. Are there obvious errors in grammar, sentence construction, and word usage?
a. It is more appreciated if you can add the intext citation behind the chart like change control process.
b. The first line of the abstract is not incent indented.
c. A Headline might be needed before the change control process chart.
e. Some referecnes format problems. eg: the second reference's second line is not indented; you don's need to indent the whole 13th refence.
f. Thre are still some mall grammar mistakes like "three-points Estimate" (p. 26) and "to working well" (p. 28.).
6. What suggestions do you have to offer?
a. You'd better follow the template more carefully. eg: I think you put too much space between the communication plan and the change control process. b. You'd better put the Process of Issue Escalation after the communication plan section. They are both belong to communication section.
c. If you can make the RACI in different colors, it will be much easier for the reader to