Definition Of Leadership

2308 Words 10 Pages
1. Definition of leadership
For different people, cultures, genders, backgrounds, situations, and environments, leadership defined varies per person. For example, a leader for a baseball team can be a coach. Someone who is going to push you to your limits, yell at you a little, and give you the greatest motivation after you lose a game. A general definition is an approachable and competent person who serves individuals or groups in need of interaction and guidance. A leader should be approachable because although leaders usually seek out those in need, sometimes an unexpected person may need help that is not under a leader’s radar. Approachability will allow others to approach you at ease with their problems or situations and tend to be more
…show more content…
Knowledgeable leaders have a better time helping others. Through their competence, it can be easier to assess who needs, what based off of your own understandings. Leadership is the action and communication methods a leader chooses to take in order to reach a common goal with their followers or surrounding peers. This can be very situational because different situations require different leaders. There are many examples of leadership that can be found in our daily lives. Our parents practice leadership by the way they raise their children. The president of the United States practices leadership when he is serving the country. Our professors and instructors practice leadership in their classrooms when they are teaching a course. Leadership is practiced in teams of two or more individuals. Without followers, there is no need for a leader.

2. Differences between leaders and managers
Managers become leaders, and leaders must perform managerial duties. Both have similar goals, yet their differences are worth noting. Managers can be seen as the problem solvers that work to accomplish certain
…show more content…
These leaders can be seen as a positive or a negative leader. For example, if a professor is an advisor for his or her Ph.D. student who only has one year left to earn their degree, this type of leadership could work best. The reason for this is because, the student may only need his or her advisor once a week or so. At this point in the student’s academic career, they are competent enough to get their task completed with minimum support compared to the beginning of their journey. On the other hand, this type of leadership could also be the least ineffective. If a student is just beginning their Ph.D. program, this type of leadership could discourage students and most likely cause them to quit or fail out. These leaders in this case have minimum concern for task and relationship, therefore are uninterested in their student’s accomplishments and nor will they encourage their students during the difficulties they will encounter throughout the

Related Documents