The Controversy Of Cosmetic Testing On Animals

An estimated 100,000-200,000 animals are testing on for the safety of cosmetic products each year around the world. The topic is cosmetic testing on animals to make sure that products are safe for use. Testing cosmetics on animals is a type of animal testing used to test the safety and hypoallergenic properties of products for use by humans. Because of the harm done to the animal subjects, this testing is opposed by animal rights activists and others. Cosmetic testing on animals is necessary to ensure the Cosmetic safety for cosmetic products. Cosmetic testing on animals is necessary because without the testing of the products, a lot of people could get serious injuries or allergic reactions to the ingredients in a certain product if it isn’t tested before it is sold. The testing should not be considered wrong or evil. People wouldn’t know the effects the product …show more content…
The lab testing on animals is better than if people tested on other people. If we didn’t have the ability to test cosmetics on animals before selling it to people using the product, people would get hurt because nobody would know if these products are unsafe. Testing these products on animals is better than if we tested these products on humans. When an animal gets injured or even killed, it would be less dismal than if a human was killed or badly injured. A human’s life is generally considered more valuable than an animal’s life. In an article written by GreenGarageBlog.org, They give 12 Pros and Cons for cosmetic testing on animals. The first pro in this article was that animal testing aids research. The article says “Without the ability to test cosmetics on animals before being released to consumers, it would be difficult for researchers to make an educated guess about these products’ safety. But with animals testing, developers of these products are able to conduct trial and error to learn more about providing consumers with the best possible