Ratifying The Constitution

Improved Essays
The American government we know today did not just appear out of nowhere, it developed over time and there were some errors, but it ultimately lead to what we have today. Today, our government is based off The Constitution, which has been in place for 200 years, but the framers did not get it right the first time, nor were the ideas used in it their own. The Constitution is a culmination of many factors, including ideas from renaissance philosophers, grievances against the king and England that lead to independence, and the failed government under The Articles of the Confederation. These factors along with the constitutional convention and ratification process molded and shaped our constitution and what is included in it to with stand 200 years …show more content…
After the revolution The United States was in debt, but could not raise any funds to repay the debt because they could not raise taxes, this was only the first of many problems. There had been a few disputes, but because the articles did not set up a judicial branch there was no way to settle them. Finally, Shay’s Rebellion in Massachussettes, an uprising of farmers, was the final straw; the central government could not stop and handle the situation and this showed the true weakness of the Articles of the Confederation. When the framers met these weaknesses were the main topics of discussion and what they were attempting to fix. Originally the framers met merely to revise the Articles, not create an entire new constitution, but a few days into the Constitutional Convention they realized that a new constitution was necessary. During the constitutional convention is when the framer began to talk about the different philosophies of the renaissance philosophers, and they discussed dieffrernt governments around the world, taking bits and pieces they liked. In the end it culminated into a new kind government which had never been established before. It was a bicameral legislation with the lower house being elected by popular election and based on population, and the upper house is appointed by the states. The executive is elected by the Electoral College, and the judicial branch would appointed and the Supreme Court would by the highest law of the land. In order to get the constitution ratified, which required 9 out of the 13 states, some states demanded a Bill of Rights. Finally, the Bill of Rights was added and the constitution was ratified and it is has been in effect for 200

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution helped shape the debate between the states, the federal government, and their citizens. The Articles of Confederation were designed primarily to divest power from the national government and protect state interests. The US Constitution set up the framework for a strong national government capable of collecting taxes and raising armies. The debate between these two documents led to compromises between the states to ensure that neither general democracy nor small state representatives held too much power but received equal participation. Representatives faced challenges of western territory disposal, slavery as population, and the problem of popular democracy. The series of compromises by the Constitutional Convention…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first government of the original thirteen colonies was established by the Articles of Confederation. During this time, there was no president or a judiciary, but a congress did exist (History). The Articles of Confederation were the first shot at a federal government in the Untied States. The main downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness (Articles of Confederation). After finally winning over independence from a dominant, ruling nation, the new United States expected to come up with a new, less disturbing government to mimic the ideal of democracy and freedom. Yet, in its attempt to avoid governing with too strong a hand, the Articles of Confederation limited the federal government to the point that it held nearly no power to permit freedom and democracy to flourish (Articles of Confederation). The federal…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it. In Federalist paper 84 they say there is no purpose for a bill of rights because it is dangerous and unnecessary in multiple ways, such as allowing the government to gain more power than it is granted. Also in Federalist paper 51, they talk about the importance of maintaining separate branches and protecting the rights of the people. However, anti-federalists strongly disagree with these claims.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Revolutionary War was won the Founding Fathers knew they had to create a document that would be able to govern the new country for many years to come. The first attempt at creating a constitution, the Articles of Confederation, proved insufficient due to the severe lack of power the national government held. To combat the nation’s problems, in the summer of 1787, the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia to discuss a new form of government. The new constitution contained compromise about slavery, representation in the houses and many other topics that would shape the nation, and completely differed from the previous document. It laid out a system of separation of powers and checks and balances, for the newly developing country to avoid…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States constitution was signed and approved by the constitutional convention delegates in 1787, and it needed ratification from nine states as it is required in article VII of the constitution before it could be enforced. States that decided not to ratify the constitution will be considered a different country, and not part of the union. With this knowledge, the urge of the ratification led to a conflict among the delegates that resulted in numerous documents, essays, pamphlets, and articles. The conflict; perhaps debate consists of two opposing sides; the Federalists who wanted the ratification of the constitution, and the Anti-Federalists objected to the ratification.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the realization of the problems caused Articles of Confederation, the leaders were able to come up with The Constitution which was drafted at the Constitutional Convention. The Constitution established America’s national government by explaining the fundamental laws and basic rights America would follow in order to have a well balanced government. Before the Constitution, the government could not change anything in The Articles of a Confederation which caused significant problems during Shays’ Rebellion. Shay’s Rebellion made it clear that The Articles of Confederation were not…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution. With so many great minds working on the same thing, there were obviously differing opinions on certain issues. The greatest issue that was not agreed upon was…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The year was 1776, and the American Colonies had just declared themselves independent of Great Britain. Congress then needed to fashion some form of governmental system. The Articles of Confederation was the first document ratified by the states to do so. The Articles of Confederation was a document written by Richard Henry Lee, a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress. It was a document that proposed the newly independent states form a confederation. In the Articles of Confederation, Congress was a single house in which each state had one vote. Even though each state could have two to seven members representing them in congress. Congress could conduct foreign affairs, make treaties, and maintain an army and navy, and borrow and print money. But the big flaw was the Congress could not collect taxes or enforce laws directly. The states had the power to tax and enforce its own laws. Article III of the Articles of Confederation states within this “firm league of friendship”, the Articles was really a confederation of the nations.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the American Revolution, the government of America was created and changed. The first form of government in America was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles established the basic functions of national government in America after its newfound independence from Britain. The Articles were not strong enough to prevent conflict in the states, Shays’ Rebellion, so states wanted more power (Doc G). Americans called for change in the Articles, so delegates from all the states met at the Constitutional Convention and instead of just making minor changes to the Articles, wrote the Constitution. The government was stronger after the Constitution, but Americans still argued about whether they liked it or not, Federalist versus Anti-Federalists (Doc I). Citizens also asked for a Bill of Rights…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders. Which in the long run was only helping his friends in Wall Street. Now the Federalist didn't want to have the central government to have more power than it did in the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist worked hard…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation had many issues with it and at times was completely unable to work as desired; when the Constitution was created it was considered to be one of the best things that had occurred. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention came together and they were after much arguing and finally compromising they came up with what we know as the Constitution (History of the United States Forming a New Nation (1784-1819)). Prior to the Constitution, states were governed under the Articles of Confederation which created problems. Each of the states was governed by an elected official and the state delegates who created a weak national government. Congress had to force the states to pay fees in order to cover the social costs of the nation.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, Gary Remer (2000) explains the idea that during the debate over the ratification of the Constitution, the speaking was done in more of an oratory way than in a conversational way. The government wanted the deliberation to be more conversational between the representatives from the states, making them believe they had a say in decisions. The ratification of the Constitution was more told, than making a decision inn a conversational method among the representatives. The representatives and Congress did talk and decide, making it seem like the decision was made during a conversation but actually, it resembled more of an oratory.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays