Compare And Contrast James Madison And Alexander Hamilton

Improved Essays
It is often the case in revolutions that many partnerships who take a lead role in shaping a new society do not continue to work together after their goal is achieved, that is exactly what happened to James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who had risen to prominent positions within the new nation of America as delegates for their respective state. Both would be each other 's support for fighting for a new and ratified U.S. constitution. Although their partnership falls apart, they are truly America’s most needed partnership. Madison and Hamilton together led the U.S. to create and ratify the U.S. Constitution, which gave people more rights, made everyone more equal, and set the path for a self-governing America.

James Madison and Alexander
…show more content…
Madison was a Virginian citizen and delegate, with the “easier path” of the two, he was raised “by a prosperous father, the wealthiest planter in Orange County”. Madison “had found purpose in the Revolution” after going to “the College of New Jersey (now Princeton)”, but “the bookish Virginian was a poor candidate for soldiering” so he moved his purpose to politics. Madison “was not only short and slight---no taller than five feet six inches and a bit over one hundred pounds”, he also suffered from an illness that resembled epilepsy. Madison was a unsocial, quiet, semi-hypocritical, non-narcissistic, sharp, unobtrusive man. Hamilton on the other hand, was “born on the island of Nevis, a flyspeck in the Caribbean”, and didn’t arrive in America until he was fourteen, when a “local businessman sent him to mainland America for formal education, first at a New Jersey academy and then at Kings College, now Columbia University.” Unfortunately for Hamilton his childhood was not a good one, …show more content…
constitution, led by Hamilton and Madison, set the stage for a self-governing America. “No one planned the process that produced America’s Constitution”, but it all started in September of 1780 when “Hamilton was the first to conclude that a new government was needed”, even before the Articles of Confederation took effect and called for congress “to revise the Articles”.Calling upon congress to come together and agree was a difficult and long process. Hamilton was always ready for a national convention, yet Madison “was not ready for that drastic step”, but “after the Mount Vernon conference and a trip to New York and Philadelphia, Madison warmed to the idea of a national convention”. The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, “the weakness of the national government afflicted everyday life” from not having a uniform currency to voting in congress and the complex almost-non existing tax system. The Philadelphia Convention, better known as the Constitutional Convention, started in May of 1787 in “America’s largest and most sophisticated” city, Philadelphia. “Madison dreamt of a nation bound by ties among its people, not among its states. To achieve that goal, its founding document had to be ratified by the people through special conventions.” For Madison this goal was achievable thanks the unity of his fellow Virginian delegates, but unluckily for Hamilton “the New York delegation was sharply split between Hamilton, who

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Michael Vipond Mr. Haindfield APUSH 1 November 2017 Unit 6 Reaction Paper In the 1780s and 1790s, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had vastly different ideas on how the economic future would be for the United States. Both of them envisioned a prominent nation, but with both different ideas on how to get there. Despite Jefferson’s view of a future of agricultural economy, which was based on farming, no national bank, and strong state governments; Hamiltons view of an industrial economy, which was based on manufacturing, a national bank, and a strong national government, prospered. The extent in which each of their visions affected the United States were reflected by strikes done in the labor work force, the repeal of the national bank by Andrew Jackson, and the growing number of textiles in the U.S. between 1810 and 1840.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America’s most important document, Patrick Henry and James Madison played two key roles in the development of the Constitution. These two men had different views on how America should be governed. Patrick Henry who was against the new Constitution and sided with the Anti-Federalists. James Madison was the architect of the Constitution and felt a powerful government was needed in order for the colonies to not fall apart. After the Revolutionary War the colonies needed some help with the low imports from Britain since they were cut off from the war and the debt was increasing.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the fifty-five delegates come together to make brilliant laws to prevent tyranny in their country. In documents A,C, and D, it lists the laws that made the United States more of a democracy rather than a republic. The delegates established federalism to prevent tyranny in the Unites States by.... “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States of America in the Post-American Revolution was overflowing with joy, fear and cautious optimism. The world had held its breath as it watched thirteen small imperial colonies succeed in defeating the British Empire and wining its long sought after independence. Unfortunately, the defeat of Britain was only the beginning of the woes America would face. It would come down to two prominent political intellectuals of the time, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, to take it upon themselves to heed this danger. Together they sought to persuade their colleagues and the masses through secret and not so secret writings and meetings.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the active form of government in America by 1777, despite not being universally ratified until 1781. During the early years following the Revolutionary War, Hamilton recognized the budding defects in current governmental structure, most notably the fact that the federal government could not wrangle the various State Legislatures to move in unison on a path to preserve the Union and protect America’s newfound liberty. Hamilton could see the writing on the wall, The Articles had created a tenuous relationship between the the States and the National governments. Hamilton’s primary criticism of the Articles was that the system did not provide the necessary amount of power for the federal government to preserve and protect the Union and its interests. The federal government lacked autonomy to take action on issues that impacted multiple states, due to the limited powers of the executive branch and propensity of legislatures to debate actions to exhaustion without taking significant action.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jack N. Rakove Summary

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rakove makes the astute observation that many Americans are sadly not aware of the beginning years of their Republic, much less are they aware of its creator, James Madison. In his short and concise book, Rakove seamlessly integrates political science and history into one whole, moving from discussing Madison to the early Confederation and Republic’s many moving parts, then back to Madison. Fortunately for Rakove, Madison felt the need to keep an accurate historical record for later Americans, and so he wrote many of this thoughts and feelings down, allowing for a level of “direct connectivity” between the reader and Madison himself. As well as these primary sources, Rakove employs many other highly-praised secondary sources to better uncover Madison and his life for the general reader. Overall, this book is a wonderfully useful piece of historical research that has been designed for use by anyone interested in learning more about early American history and politics, and confirms Rakove’s thesis that Madison was indeed a remarkable…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The emotional and dramatic debates of 1787 initiated an event turning change in the structure of the United States government. The passion of James Madison’s ambition to create an equally powered federal government through the division of government branches have set foot to what the modernized American system is seen today. Rakove elaborates in great detail of the trials and errors which the delegates of the 1787 Convention had to endure. However, without the strenuous debates, contemplating opinions, and theoretical views of the Virginia Plan delegates against the New Jersey Plan delegates, the American nation would fail to stand on the strong values of equal government power. From the various attempts to create an organized federal government power and Constitution, the intentions of the delegates of the 1787 Convention were centered upon the values of theory and philosophy rather than…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When considered within the context of the weak Articles of Confederation, the political divide between those who wanted a strong central government and those who wanted a weak central government played a key role in the 1780s in the United States. However, this disunity was not a crisis, but a catalyst for a debate and conversation that would center around the political ethos of the country. Many philosophies came out of this new conversation, with the most polarizing one being Federalism. Many of these new ideas would take center stage in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which was necessitated by this ideological split. Compromise between both sides of the debate allowed the Constitution to be completed and later ratified by all of the states in 1789, as there were aspects of the new American government that satisfied both the framers and the states.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he warned that independence, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty were all dependent upon the unity between the states. He discouraged the nation from separating into factions, ““The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.” Having Washington 's warning in mind, it’s ironic that his personally appointed Secretary of Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, and Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, formed the basis of political parties. Both helped guide the United States in interpreting the Constitution…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For brevity, I will describe the factors behind three of these events: the Burr-Hamilton duel, Madison’s outright abhorrence towards assumption, and Washington’s retirement. The interview at Weehawken. Early on the morning of July 11, 1804, Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr met as they had previously arranged and exchanged pistol shots. Who fired first was and still is not clear, but Hamilton was mortally wounded by the encounter.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The author of the book A Brilliant Solution, Carol Berkin, a successful American historian that was born in 1942 in Alabama and was awarded the Bancroft Dissertation Award, from her college at Columbia University where she was awarded and an M.A. and a Ph.D. He has written many books In her book, she summarizes the key elements in the creation of our current government and constitution. She goes into detail factoring in people's beliefs and views to help generalize an individual's standpoint on an issue. In the book, Ms. Berkin is trying to argue that the creation of the constitution was not an easy process but was very tedious work. The book A Brilliant Solution is divided into many chapters but its best summarized in the parts starting…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays