Ratifying The Constitution Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise. In regards to those in favor of the Constitution, Federalists were those who viewed the …show more content…
The Constitution was the first necessary step in proving that America was capable of managing freedom and democracy. They viewed America as an ever-expanding territory that could only survive given a balanced federal government. As the excerpt from James Madison’s public defense of the Constitution states, many foreign governments at the time refused to engage in treaties with America and did not hold the country in high respect because of the ongoing strife between the government and it’s people. Madison argued that ratifying the Constitution would eliminate much of the disunity between the states and would create trust between the general and individual government. He also emphasized the proposal of a three-fourths consensual agreement policy when ratifying new amendments. Up until this point, there had been rising animosity in America because the majority of the thirteen states could be in favor of an amendment but it would only take one opposing state to nullify the opinions of all the others. Madison claimed that it was unreasonable for a government to rely on the unanimous approval of all states in order to abolish

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He argued that an army was necessary, and argued taxes was not for the direct taxation but for tariffs and indirect taxes. Madison said the national government could not turn into a tyranny because the power would come from state government and the people not just the national government. As the debate continued, the Federalists continued to convince the remaining states to ratify. Once they agreed to add a Bill of Rights, the decision was…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newell Prindle Jr Summary

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Newell, Prindle, and Riddlesperger, Jr. coherently state thoughts about constitutions that I agree with in their statement: The flexibility inherent in [the United States Constitution] has made possible the country’s transition from a nation whose government was mainly concerned with fending off ‘hostile’ Native Americans and delivering the mail to one whose government now shoulders the burdens of world leadership and myriad socioeconomic policies. (Newell, Prindle, Riddlesperger, Jr., 55) As Texas and the nation goes into future years and decades, numerous amounts of issues will arise. These issues and dilemmas can be mended or solved with constitutional reforms and amendments.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution is a very significant document throughout US history. However, during the ratification of the Constitution, many people had differences in opinions. The two groups who argued over the ratification were the Federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists were the ones in favor of the new constitution’s balance of power between the states and the national government. Important members of this group were George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this document, James Madison explains the reasoning of the Continental Congress’s decision to revise the Articles of Confederation. Many events such as national bankruptcy, tension with the British and problems in Massachusetts occurred and showcased the weaknesses of the current Articles. Madison is quick to proclaim the futility of those Articles unless a provision is placed on them. A solution which various leaders, including Madison, supported was the idea of a centralized government rather than the separate ones in each state.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison thought that with two governments (state and federal government) the people would have double security. (Doc A) This is true because the federal government does make laws that protect the people; The state governments also make more laws for their state to protect the people further. One example of this is that laws make criminals face jail time.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Madison thinks that the Republic proposed in the Constitution is what America needs. There are enough congressional representatives that a few dissenters will not have a large impact on the government, but there are not so many representatives that the government fails to give the people what they want. The checks and balances put into place on the branches of this government help to ensure that the citizens have rights and a say in the government, but they do not have so much control over the government that it threatens the social order of the…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist Papers are one of the most important pieces of American Government and history. These eighty-five letters were very significant because they were compelling in inducing states to ratify the new Constitution instead of sticking to the weak Articles of Confederation. The authors of the Federalist Paper’s utilized sensible arguments to clarify the importance of such a change. These authors confronted the arguments colonists were making against the ratification of the new Constitution. After the letters were published in the newspapers, colonists against the change, sent letters back commending the new ideas in the constitution the United States has today.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    constitution, led by Hamilton and Madison, set the stage for a self-governing America. “No one planned the process that produced America’s Constitution”, but it all started in September of 1780 when “Hamilton was the first to conclude that a new government was needed”, even before the Articles of Confederation took effect and called for congress “to revise the Articles”. Calling upon congress to come together and agree was a difficult and long process. Hamilton was always ready for a national convention, yet Madison “was not ready for that drastic step”, but “after the Mount Vernon conference and a trip to New York and Philadelphia, Madison warmed to the idea of a national convention”. The Articles of Confederation needed to be revised, “the weakness of the national government afflicted everyday life” from not having a uniform currency to voting in congress and the complex almost-non existing tax system.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    And the ability for the document to be amended for changing times and situations is proof of innovative thinking from the founding fathers. Furthermore, this union of ideals and standards created a government that is “both specific enough to outline the basic powers of our government and flexible (through the process of amendments) that it meets the challenges of contemporary life. It is not a static document of the late 18th century, but a living and breathing source of democracy” (Political Science Research Paper Topic Suggestions on the…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays