The message is given to the followers and if properly done it will be fixed by the followers for that reason to what the leader intended to send. The key emphasis of this research was the leader; consequently, the explanation of task completion by the followers is kept little here. After encoding the followers do the acts in order to attain the agreed aims. Supporting procedures such as two-way communication enhance the duty attainment (Green, 2017).
Feedback
Feedback must be given throughout the procedure but latest after the aim has been attained. The new set of information will be then again investigated in the “learning centre” of the leader and new understandings and global/organisational variations might lead to new ideas. Therefore, the leadership procedure starts …show more content…
The trait approach begins in the starting of the 20th century. Contingency theory was established in the 1960s while the transformational leadership theory was raised up in the 1980s. Their importance and the methods they work are different, their strong point and weakness also be different Thomson, 2013).
The trait theory emphases newly on the leader and his potentials. It usually ignored the leader-secondary communications and the situational circumstances. Contradictory to the trait approach, contingency theory pressures on the grade to which the leader’s style sets the state. Transformational leadership theory, on the contrary, focuses on the feelings of the followers. It is a procedure of altering and transforming individuals and it inspires people to achieve better than the stage they are probable. Therefore we can see that the trait theory focuses more on the leader himself through the contingency theory and the transformation leadership theory are worried about the leader-situation connection and leader-follower relationship correspondingly (Higgs,
Feedback
Feedback must be given throughout the procedure but latest after the aim has been attained. The new set of information will be then again investigated in the “learning centre” of the leader and new understandings and global/organisational variations might lead to new ideas. Therefore, the leadership procedure starts …show more content…
The trait approach begins in the starting of the 20th century. Contingency theory was established in the 1960s while the transformational leadership theory was raised up in the 1980s. Their importance and the methods they work are different, their strong point and weakness also be different Thomson, 2013).
The trait theory emphases newly on the leader and his potentials. It usually ignored the leader-secondary communications and the situational circumstances. Contradictory to the trait approach, contingency theory pressures on the grade to which the leader’s style sets the state. Transformational leadership theory, on the contrary, focuses on the feelings of the followers. It is a procedure of altering and transforming individuals and it inspires people to achieve better than the stage they are probable. Therefore we can see that the trait theory focuses more on the leader himself through the contingency theory and the transformation leadership theory are worried about the leader-situation connection and leader-follower relationship correspondingly (Higgs,