• Home Page
  • Capital Punishment Essay: The Morality Of The Death Penalty

Capital Punishment Essay: The Morality Of The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Show More
Should man determine whether another man lives or dies? This is what the Death Penalty shows us, that a man has the right to kill and torture another man if he chooses to do so. This is so wrong, and the Death Penalty should not be a form of capital punishment. Over the past several years, the most widely publicized issue in capital litigation has been the constitutional status of state 's lethal injection protocols. With some exception, both the anti- and pro physician participation literature shares a common premise: The ethics of Physician 's participation should be analyzed independently from the morality of the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty should not be used because it doesn’t deter the rate of crimes and that many innocent people …show more content…
Our childhood has never really spoken the truth concerning how this really works. Ask yourself this question. “What really, is Capital Punishment? In this simpler way it can be explained, “capital punishment is defined on a person taking away life to someone,” (Capital Punishment Is Dead Wrong). This is called murder. Capital punishment is one of the biggest crimes, still today, without consequences and this must stop now! This need to be illegal everywhere. This carries a huge, dangerous risk if this was to ever happen to someone innocent. In 1984, a man named Kirk Bloodsworth who was sent to death row was convicted of rape and murder of a very young age girl. Bloodsworth spend several years sitting in the death row of a crime he didn’t commit. He was released in 1993, after DNA testing confirmed his innocence. He was the first person to be released from death row based on DNA testing. In 1986, Randy Steidl was convicted for the murder of two people Named Dyke and Karen Rhoads. He spent 17 years in prison and 12 of those on death row. Almost all his life, he was locked up and put on death row for no purpose. In 2004, he was finally freed after the Illinois State police found that Steidl had been wrongfully imprisoned and that is was a big mistake. (Exonerations of Innocent Men and Women.) The innocent lives that have been taken away from someone else because of our own government should be enough to take away the death penalty (Free at …show more content…
They are doing nothing but taking the lives of other people for no go reason. Other choices could have been selected instead of the Death Penalty. Killing more and more people because of what they may have done and was involved in doesn’t mean that it’s okay killing or tutoring other lives. We have to take Death Penalty serious! It’s not making things better, but only worse, specially to their families! The Death Penalty is a violation of natural rights. We need to replace the Death Penalty and make it a safer and more inexpensive option. It does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, and it does not follow the goals and promises to our nation. The Death Penalty is very effective, and does not make things get better. Nothing good comes to hate and nothing good will ever come from the Death Penalty, not never! This should not continue on and be accepted in our community or anywhere else in the state. Still today, many other states still have a Death Penalty in their community and think that it’s just okay to take someone’s else live in advantage, which this is not okay. How could some people be so selfish? The Death Penalty is murder and it’s dead wrong! I would love to save many peoples ' lives of getting executed or put in jail for no reason. This has to come to an end immediately and right away

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment Essay: The Death Penalty Deters Crime
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital Punishment Essay: The Death Penalty Deters Crime

    Executing a ruthless killer sends a message to everyone in society; every life, especially innocent ones are so meaningful and what the murderer did is so wrong that he must be executed for what he did. No person in this world gets to decide who dies and who lives, but when someone murders someone else, why should they have the right to live, get food and get visits from their family while they're in prison and maybe even get to be paroled or finish their sentence and have the chance to live again while their victim is no longer alive. Also, having murderers sentenced to just prison time, send a message to society by making them think murder is not so bad afterall, because they just get prison time like other criminals that steal or people that do not pay their parking tickets. Many people deny that having the death penalty does not lower crime rates, but in states that do have capital punishment, murder rates decrease. Research done by the Federal Communications Commission, SUNY Buffalo, Clemson University, and University of Houston show that executing murderers and people that commit horrible crimes protects innocent lives. Everyone is taught that they are responsible for their actions as a child, everyone is responsible for their own actions, specially adults, for that reason they should be punished for their crimes accordingly. For…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Ambiguity Of Capital Punishment Analysis
    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ambiguity Of Capital Punishment Analysis

    In most states, the imposition of the death penalty on certain; mostly murderous crimes is established in the perceptions of the cost of such crimes to the victims’ families and the social cost to the society. There even appears to be an economic inclination saliently factored into the justice of capital punishment by comparing the value of imprisonment cost as opposed to the cost of incarceration. There appears to be an automatic or reflexive behavior for a retributive justice towards violent crimes involving murder of a loved one. Even the most ardent opponents to the death penalty as in my case, I succumb to the default psychological judgment of wanting justice at all cost. The problem for me arises when there is not an absolute evidence of facts that links an accused person to such crimes, and even if there was one, the facts in this case can be subjective. Even a 0.0001 error in findings is enough to dissuade me from supporting capital punishment as the death penalty. In the current discourse or public debate as it relates to the death penalty in the United States, lethal injection used to execute a condemned person only serves to smooth-over the horrors of death penalty in the minds of the public; eventually muting the debate about the practice itself. Capital punishment like the…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Reggie Clemon
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Reggie Clemon

    As Thoreau says, “It is not a man’s duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong,” which sums up how the death penalty shouldn’t be allowed since no man should be tasked with the duty of taking the life of someone else do to their crimes and wrong doing; it’s hypocrisy (Thoreau). The death penalty is often thought to be cheaper than holding a prisoner for life, but that is false (OADP). It is believe that the state would save around 2.3 million dollars if they got rid of the death penalty, but the death penalty already causes around 9 million dollars a year (OADP). All of that money would be much better off helping the victims affected by the crimes of the criminals put on death row to give the victims counseling and assistance where needed. The death penalty also does not deter crime because states without the death penalty tend to have lower murder rates than neighboring states that do have the death penalty (OADP). The death penalty is only still living due to the misconceptions and can only be put away for good if the US citizens show their distaste for the barbaric punishment. Instead the US is spending millions of unnecessary dollars on executions and believing it deters crime which is also false (OADP). Reggie Clemons lost many years of his life due to the grueling system of death row and prison and the citizens of the US paid for it…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Abolishing Death Penalty
    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abolishing Death Penalty

    We as a free society should spend more money bettering our community rather than on someone that’s more than likely is going to get executed. This society accepts such a cruel penalty, which allows the killing of another human to be seek. Since the penalty is legalized, we as a state is now listed under the same category as other states, that we judge for being so unhuman like and cruel. A study by Abdul-Jabarr, k (2015) states that states that are in the U.S. that doesn’t have the Death Penalty, have a lower homicide and murder rate than the others. Another huge issue that prosecutors have to live with is, what if it was a wrongful conviction? Prosecutors may sentence a wrongful convicted inmate to the Death Penalty, and time later may seek to evidence that proves that the inmate was innocent. So another innocent person dies, instead of having a life sentence until further notice with the case. Equality doesn’t stand a chance with our supposed to be justice system. The system is really sort of a shady business, and rules that we have to follow. Some argue against the fact of abolishing the Death Penalty, states that if the people know that there is a chance they would be placed on Death Row, less crimes would be the…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Synthesis Essay On The Death Penalty
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Synthesis Essay On The Death Penalty

    America is in the midst of a massive debate in regards to the constitutionality of the application of the death penalty, and while the importance of the Constitution cannot be understated in regards to this discussion, other factors, such as social science evidence and the many different ways in which the Constitution can be interpreted, are equally important.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Killing People Is Wrong
    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Death Penalty: Killing People Is Wrong

    ‘Killing people is wrong’, a statement everyone can stand behind, however, in some arguments, would depend on who did the killing (Koch 483). The death penalty has been under the watchful eye of the United States population for some time now, and has developed an audience on both sides of the argument. Many believe the death penalty is morally wrong, alluding to scriptures from the Bible. Others would argue the death penalty is a way of justice for the murderers and ultimately for the victims. The light shed from opposing views could help reach a resolve and put the issue at rest, however, in the meantime, one must pull from both sides to decide for themselves.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment
    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hammurabi Punishment

    We should not allow one who has murdered to remain a murderer. The ones truly affected are the victims and the ones sentenced to death no one will shed a tear for. Prison is a vacation for most prisoners they are fed three times a day, have a roof over their heads, and are given jobs. To allow them to live with a life sentence is giving them an easy out not the death penalty. By taking their life they will not be given the luxuries to see family, have meals, and live day to day. The death penalty is appropriate in deterrence of that criminal that they will not commit again. The death penalty is also deterrence for those wanting to know the consequences of their actions and if the legal system imposed the death penalty on all murder crimes then murder rates would fall. The death penalty is just that and that’s what it was put in place for is to deter others from committing the same crime. By allowing states to abolish the death penalty then we are allowing for more murders and more crime to be committed because the fear of death is now…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Why The Death Penalty Should Be Illegal
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay On Why The Death Penalty Should Be Illegal

    “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” which is how the death penalty basically works, the only actual purpose of the death penalty is vengeance which should never be the reason for any punishment especially being one created by the united states government . The death penalty is something that has been here in the US since the 1600s but has changed and progressed into a less cruel form, it is stated that the first form of death penalty was in the form of hanging and has to progressed to the now used injections which will first put the victim to sleep and then stop his heart from functioning, giving the accused with a peaceful death. The death penalty should be made made illegal in the US because their are many other punishments available…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty In The United States
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty In The United States

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This passage written by Thomas Jefferson and taken directly from the Declaration of Independence defines the rights the American nation is founded upon. These “unalienable” rights every American has “endowed” upon them are ones that cannot be taken away. The taking of a person’s life inhibits a person from having a life, seeking liberty, and pursuing happiness and thus is going against the fundamentals America is founded upon. The death penalty is racist and expensive and…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment In The Criminal Justice System
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Capital Punishment In The Criminal Justice System

    Capital punishment in America has its pros and its cons. To some people this technique of taking someone’s life is unethical. Many believe that its what the person deserved and the family gets retribution. Capital punishment is a current issue in the criminal justice system and should be handled more carefully. I’m here to tell you both sides of the issue and state my position on this topic. I believe the death penalty is wrong and unethical. This is why all States should ban capital punishment from their laws.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of The Death Penalty In The United States
    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Importance Of The Death Penalty In The United States

    Controversial topics have been in our nations politics since the beginning of our government’s creation. One of these that still comes up today is that regarding the death penalty and if it should be legal or not, even more so if it is humane or inhumane. Almost all death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied to a variety of crimes, the list just goes on for other crimes. Ultimately we should be asking ourselves the moral question surrounding capital punishment in the United States, which has to do with whether a convicted criminal of certain crime deserve to die or not, which crimes we deem permissible, and whether government or us as people in general deserve to kill those who have to spend the rest of their lives behind bars.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Systematic Denial
    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Systematic Denial

    The United States was founded on the inherent truth that all men were created equal and endowed with certain unalienable. One of these rights is the right to life, and as a right can not be taken away. Our founding constitution exists to ensure that individual rights are protected and not to be abused by the states. Capital punishment is in obvious tension with this document, with the right to life and the basic beliefs of our government. To hold an individual in prison and to inform him that he will be put to death on a specified date is cruel and inhumane. It is an offense to human dignity and maintains a cycle of violence that defeats the purpose of the death penalty. Our justice system has valid alternatives to the death penalty, such as life imprisonment without parole, which substitutes as a valid alternative even for the most appalling crimes. The point should not be to judge whose life is more worthwhile, but rather to affirm that all human life must be valued. A process of which ends a human's existence cannot be systematic in a society that is upstanding and just. This practice offends our basic understanding of what is humanly tolerable…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty
    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok. To them, two wrongs make a right. Through some analysis, it can be found that this logic is flawed. The government should not have the right to kill its own citizens. The death penalty is an inefficient, unreasonable, and immoral policy. It should be banned from the United States.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment
    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examples Of Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment

    Google defines Capital Punishment as “the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is argued that the death penalty is justice for those who commit crimes deserving of such extreme punishment. It is argued that the death penalty is a punishment set up so that the grieving families of the victims will feel a sense of accomplished justice. According to the Death penalty information center since 1976 there has been 1,438 executions. The death penalty should be abolished because it is a barbaric, immoral, and small-minded.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Capital Punishment Debate
    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Issues In Capital Punishment Debate

    The ethical dilemmas that are faced when discussing capital punishment are many; What crime merits the punishment of death?; Is there such a crime?; How is the execution to be carried out?; How much pain should the prisoner be allowed to endure?; What if the prisoner was wrongfully accused?; In the face of all these issues, the main dilemma remains to be not whether the person who has committed the crime deserve to die, but rather, does the state have the right (or deserve) to execute a person who has been found…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings