The first reason why airport searches should be allowed is that it makes sure bad things don't get taken on airplanes, “Since our stand up in 2002, we have screened nearly six billion passengers. Our frontline officers have detected thousands of firearms and countless other prohibited items and we have prevented those weapons from entering the cabin of an aircraft.” They do this for our safety and so nothing bad happens to the passengers or the pilot and the flight attendants when the plane is landed and or in flight. Also so people don't get hurt. This connects with the American Constitution because back then and today nobody wants someone to get …show more content…
Also it make things more efficient, “Using full-body scanners is more effective than manually patting down every passenger, advocates claim.” This supports my claim because it takes ness time and gets people on time to places and its more efficent which the people during the consultation were trying to do all the time.
One reason why someone might think airport searches are bad is the lack of privacy. A lot of people will say that Airport invade their privacy and their IV amendment, “The images the scanners create clearly represent an invasion of privacy” I do not think this is true because i believe that airport searches are there to protect us and not to do anything else, they make it so we are safe and that's why i think airport searches should be allowed
Airport searches should be allowed in airports because of they stop bad things from coming on the planes and hurting people and they are more