The Fourth Amendment Protects People Not Places Essay

Good Essays
The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories. It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by …show more content…
In fact, most searches violate of the Fourth Amendment unless it conducted after a warrant has been used based on probable cause. Undercover and “Institution” Agents are pivotal factors in conducting searches that do not infringe on the rights stated in the Amendment. Undercover agents who take action based on the consent of the defendant imply that no intrusion took place and the Amendment was upheld. INSERT COURT CASE Along with Searches, Seizures also have guidelines and stipulations that are designed to abide by the Fourth Amendment. There are three tiers within the category of seizures, arrest, investigatory stop and a consensual encounter.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is meant to protect the citizen from unreasonable seizures and searches without a warrant. This includes having their homes, persons, and items in their homes searched by police as well as other officials. Following the Amendment, if a police officer suspects that a citizen has is perpetrating or is taking part in a crime, the office has first to obtain a warrant legally. The warrant has to be granted by a judge before the offer can enter the property of the suspect as he or she searches for evidence. This amendment has been observed to have both negative and negative impact on law enforcement.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A search and seizure have to be within reason, with a descriptive warrant explaining exactly what is to be searched and seized, signed by a judge. Search and seizure without a warrant can be conducted if the citizen volunteer permission. The Fourth Amendment is used when one feels their rights are offended. The Fifth Amendment is the protection against the incrimination of self. Within a criminal case, the individual cannot be a…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So this device can be used in a dangerous manner but it can also be in a good way, like a policeman’s gun he can use it to arrest criminals or use it to commit crimes himself. Are we supposed to get rid of the a tool just because it is dangerous even though it helps keep us safe? “In most states, police can get many kinds of cellphone data without obtaining a warrant, which they would need to search someone 's home or car. Privacy advocates, legislators and courts are debating the legal standards with increasing intensity as technology -- and the amount of sensitive information people entrust to their devices -- evolves.” (Source B) Kelly advocates that as technology used to catch criminals and stop crimes evolves so will the laws to keep this powerful tool in check. I believe that we should put in guide laws to keep what we use this for safe and not used against us or in a degrading way.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5. The giver of consent is aware of their right to refuse to permit the police to engage in the conduct requested and/or may pull their consent at anytime; 6. The giver of consent is aware of the possible consequences of giving consent. Many legal arguments have arisen due to the consent authority as it pertains to digital evidence. Many of these arguments involve the giver of consent not actually having the…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, our right to live isn’t the only right that needs protection. Frequently the line between safety and privacy seems to get blurry. This isn’t a new phenomenon, people are very quick to invade privacy, which is why we have certain protections. One of these rights that is protected is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” This quote can be seen in the fourth amendment of the U.S. constitution. It basically protects us from unreasonable searches without a warrant.…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment Through the Fourth Amendment individuals are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, detainment, and hinder illicitly seized items from being used as evidence in a criminal case. For the Amendment to be applicable, it depends on the nature of the arrest, the place that has been searched, and the conditions in which the search was executed. When a law enforcement officer violates a person’s constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment, which includes a search and seizure that has been deemed unlawful any evidence that was obtained during the search and seizure will be excluded from any criminal case…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Patriot Act is an apparent violation of first, fourth, and sixth amendment rights. This act violates the first amendment because, as stated in the Bill of Rights, people have the privilege to freedom of speech and freedom of the press. However, under this act, things people say or print may be used against them as a form of protection for others. The fourth amendment is violated by the U.S. Patriot Act because it states that people are secure from unreasonable, unauthorized searches. Conversely, this act allows the government to search anyone if they are deemed suspicious, despite whether or not they have a warrant.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised. The Fourth Amendment was created by our Founding Fathers for this exact reason. If a police officer can conduct a warrantless search without receiving adequate consent then our Fourth Amendment right to privacy will continue to be violated, a violation our great Constitution does not permit. In Matlock, the court decided that a third party could give consent to search if they had common authority over the object or premises. U.S. v. Matlock, 415 S. Ct. 164, 171 (1974).…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This of course must occur through proper procedures and without the violation of constitutional law, which we discussed though the beginning of this research paper. The main reason for the establishment of the Bill of Rights is to protect the people against governments’ power. A search occurs “when and expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable is infringed (Cox, McCamey, & Scaramella, 2014, p. 207). Law enforcement first and foremost must establish probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain a person or seize someone’s property. A seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interference with and individual’s possessory interests in that property (Cox, McCamey, & Scaramella, 2014, p. 207).…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Law enforcement officers may be on an undercover mission or operation that may require them to follow procedures as well as the five interdependent phases of Operations security in order to ensure their safety and protection. Operations security does not just apply to undercover operations. Operations security applies to law enforcement officers in all aspects of their job from traffic stops to drug raids. Operations security applies to law enforcement offices from traffic stops to drug raids because in operations security, the department implementing it must be capable of thinking like their primary enemy. If the department isn’t capable of thinking like their enemy then they will not be able to figure out what their primary enemy or criminal is out to destroy.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays