Do you think college athletes should be paid? On one side, some believe that college athletes should be paid. However, some believe they shouldn’t. Currently being debated is the idea that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because they already receive scholarship money, they won’t be paid enough for as well as they play, and big-money sports bring in more funds to support less profitable sports. According to Scholastic, “NCAA says top athletes get other benefits, like scholarships often covering tuition”. This says, athletes are getting help with their tuition so there is no need for them to be payed. One piece of evidence to back this up from The New York Times is, “The athletes at the University of Texas already received 3.1 million dollars in scholarship money”. This shows that scholarship athletes shouldn’t be paid because they are already receiving funds to assist with tuition.
…show more content…
The main reason to support this comes from The Atlantic “Embiid had produced 4.67 wins for the Jayhawks. . . economist Robert Brown estimated that one win for the Kansas men’s basketball team was worth $159,601. . .Embiid was worth approximately $777,286. . .this means the Jayhawks have underpaid Embiid by a bit more than $650,000.” This means a college is not able to pay an athlete, such as Embiid, enough for what they are worth. Therefore athletes should not be paid.
Lastly, Scholastic provides, big-money sports bring in more funds to support less profitable sports. A quote to support this reason is “Such programs might suffer or even be eliminated if the more profitable programs suddenly had to give top athletes a cut of revenues.” This explains, that if the athletes are being paid a portion of money from college funds, the more well-known sports will earn more than the less popular sports. This also supports college athletes not being
The main reason to support this comes from The Atlantic “Embiid had produced 4.67 wins for the Jayhawks. . . economist Robert Brown estimated that one win for the Kansas men’s basketball team was worth $159,601. . .Embiid was worth approximately $777,286. . .this means the Jayhawks have underpaid Embiid by a bit more than $650,000.” This means a college is not able to pay an athlete, such as Embiid, enough for what they are worth. Therefore athletes should not be paid.
Lastly, Scholastic provides, big-money sports bring in more funds to support less profitable sports. A quote to support this reason is “Such programs might suffer or even be eliminated if the more profitable programs suddenly had to give top athletes a cut of revenues.” This explains, that if the athletes are being paid a portion of money from college funds, the more well-known sports will earn more than the less popular sports. This also supports college athletes not being