Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

803 Words 4 Pages
Animal testing is a broad subject with many crucial elements. Although, the term, animal testing, is essentially defined as the use of non-human models as testing material. The number of animals used as testing subjects are continuing to rise all over the world, particularly in the United States. Every year an estimated 26 million animals are used just in the United States alone for scientific and commercial testing purposes (Hajar). While there may be some benefits of animal experimentation, the drawbacks are what everyone needs to consider concerning the welfare of animals as well as the ethics of these studies being performed everyday. Virtually, the importance of this subject is extremely significant, as animals are not as inferior to humans as we may think they are. Therefore, should animal testing for all purposes be banned? Animals have a range of emotions and can feel pain and …show more content…
People that support animal testing may say that there is absolutely no other alternative to testing on a system. Fortunately, there are a number of alternatives to be used in this case. Replacing animals with non-animal models and modern developed technology can greatly reduce the number of animals used in testing and can can bring many various benefits as well. The advancement of modern medical technology in today’s society gives us no reason to continue using animals as testing material. For instance, the term biotechnology, is currently allowing test tubes to be substituted for animals in experimentation (Rowan). Replacing animals with this type of technology can give scientists a better understanding of animals and humans, and it is a more rational system opposed to the traditional system of testing. The housing and staffing are only a fraction of all of the costs that could be significantly reduced if fewer, or no, animal tests were carried out and

Related Documents