What Are The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Hayleigh Hamrick-Sharp
Mrs. Haver
English 12
October 27, 2017 Should Animal Testing Continue or End:
Most people do not know what goes on behind the scenes of the beauty industry. How do people think they determine whether a product is safe for a human or not? Animal testing is the most used method of testing products. There are many things people don't know about the method and there are many people against it. Testing on animals is an ongoing debate among people due to the reasoning, pros and cons, and the alternative choices available. There are many reasons that people test on animals. “Animal experimentation became the primary method of learning about anatomy, physiology, and disease processes.” (13). Using animals for
…show more content…
Focusing on the pros first, animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. (Should Animals). Some people think that animals are appropriate to test on because of how similar they are to humans. Some also say that it is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect the animals from mistreatment. (Should animals). It is said that animal researchers treat animals humanely, both for the animals sake and for reliable test results. However, the cons are still pretty big. Most think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Also, it is said that animals are very different than humans and make poor test subjects. (Should Animals). Animal body functions seem to work differently than ours. For example, dogs are allergic to chocolate and cannot have it, not every human is allergic to chocolate. That is just one example of the difference between animal and human bodies. 95% of the animals used in experiments are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act. (Should Animals). Testing on animals is also a lot more expensive and non-practical than alternative methods. (Animals In). “Some people, including some scientists object to the practice strictly on ethical and moral grounds, refuting or rejecting any scientific evidence that animal testing is helpful to humans.” (Judson 12). However, groups opposing the cruel treatment of animals were influential in getting regulations passed to protect welfare of animals. (Judson 10). A lot of people agree that the leading con of animal testing is how the animals are treated. From being beaten, to getting diseases from the products that are tested on them. It's no doubt, animals go through a lot in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many companies today use animals as testing subjects especially in the beauty industry. Yet, nothing is stopping these companies from hurting and/or killing defenseless animals just for the sake of research. Not only does it cause torture and pain to these animals, but it also affects them mentally. Using animals as testing subjects is just like a cord of rope; yes, if tied around the hands loosely enough, the rope will not damage much, but the tighter the rope becomes, the more pain and suffering the individual receives. Many individuals believe using humans as testing subjects is dreadful and appalling.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Experimentation Animal Experimentation has been a problem and it still remains being one of the biggest problems. Most people agree that animal experimentation should be banned but there is no agreement of what the outcome would be. Although, there are other ways of getting results without testing on animals which are, human tissue, drug trials, genetic testing, etc. Other people think animal testing is the best way because some animals have an organism as a human like traits such as mice, rats, cats, monkeys, pigs etc. Sometimes testing on an animal does not completely match with a human body reaction towards the outcome of the research from an animal.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A drug tested on animals to prove if it’s safe for humans is a very risky move because all drugs affect various species differently. Lastly, do we have the right to test on these creatures? ”There is no doubt that animals experience a life… Like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction” (Cothran 29). Animals feel much more pain that what we think and have a life that they should be allowed to live without the intrusion of humans. Animal experimentation, one of the many injustices we still have, should be a thing of the…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also new effective medical treatments have been effectively developed because of animal experiments. However the tests that the animals are used are extremely painful and immoral. Although people are using animals to satisfy their own desires and do not consider the rights of animals that were sacrificed for animal experiment. People should know that the animals used in animal experimentation are worthier than the benefits that people can earn…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Along with their opinion that animal testing is unnecessary, animal rights activists are concerned that research animals receive poor treatment and care. However, “scientists, veterinarians, physicians, surgeons, and others who do research in animal laboratories are as much concerned about the care of the animals as anyone can be” (Animal Research 8). Animal rights groups make assumptions about the treatment of animals in research labs without accurate research to back up their statements. The groups say the animals are not adequately cared for, yet in reality the researchers are always making sure the animals are treated humanely and live comfortably. Additionally, “animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animals feel pain and they suffer while being tested on, and it is not right for us to imprison and abuse them. Animal researching should be outlawed in the United States because there are other alternatives, it is unethical, and does not always provides a reliable result. What many people do not realize is that various alternatives to animal testing exist and it is not a necessity to tests on them. Rather than exposing animals to painful tests- other means of experimentation, as well as food, cosmetic, and drug testing are an option. Things such as human-patient simulators, computer modeling, and human research volunteers can easily take the place of animals ("Alternatives to Animal Testing" PETA).…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is a wide array of studies concluding there is a weak-link between animals and useable results for the human body. In a forum by Andrew N. Rowan he states, “a healthy animal that experiences a sudden stroke does not undergo the slowly progressive arterial damage that usually plays a crucial role in human strokes.” (2006. P. 80). Rowan states that animals are not reliable testing subjects because their anatomy, biology, and overall beings are not exactly like humans so testing on animals is useless. Most of the time animals react differently to drugs and chemicals used in cosmetic products compared to human beings.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Testing Advantages

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Animal experimentation only benefits human beings if their results are valid” (Experimentation on animals) Many of the test done my scientist and researchers are not one hundred percent accurate. People should not test on animals when the information that he or she is gathering will in reality not benefit other people and not the animals. The “Reactions to the exposure of these products vary among species”(About Animal Testing) which make it hard to gather data from animal testing. This makes it more difficult to apply certain products to real life situations involving humans. There is no need to continue testing on animals when the data gathered not reliable and can not be accurately applied to humans when they are the intended…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays