Roles In Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases. He was able to do so by actively listening to the not guilty party and giving them chances to speak without interruption. As a result of his action, Foreman can be classified in both the task roles and the maintenance role. The task role is …show more content…
He tried to see the positive side of every argument and can be exclaimed as the devil’s advocate and an information giver. He plays the devils advocated by throwing out possibilities of “what if this happened?”. He is also an information giver because he points out many of the perspective of the case that other jurors where blind to. His perspective on the case is driven by his self interest of justice. As long as there is a room for a reasonable doubt, Henry will defend the case.
Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own.
Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father. Most of the time he is a loud outspoken person with strong beliefs on his own opinions without looking at different perspectives. As a result he can be seen as the stage hog, because he wants to be heard by speaking loud and obnoxiously. He also does not let other jurors speak fully, because their opinions are not clearly important to him. As a result, it caused all the other jurors to turn their backs on him, while he was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    His vote is "not guilty" when he has a good reason for his opinion. Edward bins as a juror 6 was described as an honest person, good decision maker, sympathetic and aggressive. But he is dull-witted men and take a time to see the good about other people. However, finally he agrees with Juror 8 after he removed the mind spreads generated by jury 3, 4, 10 with hot…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even the temperamental Juror 3 acknowledges Juror 8 as the leader of the group on several occasions. By taking this lead role Juror 8 is able to lead the jury in an out of topics and issues. He approaches the situations with an unbiased opinion and works to remain neutrality until the rest of the jury begins to reform their opinions. He doesn’t allow his prejudice or stereotyping of the boy on trial to cloud his judgment. He also displays effective communication examples to the group.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This juror is contemplative, meaning he will gather all the evidence and talk to his fellow jurors, combining thoughts to make an unanimous decision. He is a resilient man who leaves it on himself to make unbearable decisions for the group, because he wants to make sure the outcome is optimal for the defendant. Juror eight has patience, with his fellow jurors, thus improving communication.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the many characteristics that enable juror number eight to successfully persuade others is his calm and rational manner when it comes to handling the trial. He appears as a thoughtful man who really takes the case seriously, and he does not grow impatient or aggressive when all others oppose his ideas. Unlike the other jurors who seem possessed by their personal emotions and prejudices over the issue or their impatience of simply wanting to get the trial over with, only juror number eight realizes the great significance of the vote in his hands and fully comprehends how it will determine the fate of a valuable life. As a result, out of all the twelve jurors, only juror number eight dares to sacrifice his own energy and time against the opinions of all others to fight for the possible innocence of the boy. This in turn reflects the overwhelming compassion of a man who willingly attempts to think from the accused’s perspective and believes in giving the accused “a few words” and a chance to speak his side of the story.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Skeptical one stayed on the not responsible side until the very last discussion day due to doubts. The Angry one yelled a lot and was very passionate. He did end up helping convince jurors but it was also hard to follow him since everyone else was wrong in his eyes. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #3 was not receptive to anyone else’s ideas. He has his opinion and is unwilling or unable to discuss with others.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, when Juror 4 said to everyone regarding about a baffling conflict, “I don't see any need for arguing like this. I think we ought to be able to behave like gentlemen." (16) This shows how Juror 4 is confident and determined to resolve the case and not play around. He tries very hard to calm many jurors down instead of letting it go and think of other things, this shows that he cares about the case. Moreover, Juror 8 also shows us that he cares about the case because he thinks and tries very hard to back up his claim so that is seems believable.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not a permanent solution though, and people go back to thinking that he is innocent. As a result he only gets more angry with juror eight and makes him think that the kid is guilty. Overall, juror number three is an angry man who only believes what he’s told himself to make him feel better. He only appreciates the opinions that he has believed all his life. He yells at people a lot when someone disagrees with him.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Just Mercy Symbolism

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Bryan sets a theme of life and good, no matter how much racist police officers or judges there are. What’s most important is how he talks when you read the book. You don’t hear anger or rage, but instead you would hear disappointment, and then hope. He was himself a target of racial profiling and still was able to have faith to continue to fight for his clients. Another big example he uses to portray injustice in a sense would be his juvenile cases.…

    • 2034 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The delivery of a righteous and just verdict is depicted in Reginald Rose 's naturalistic play, Twelve Angry Men. On the surface, the use of rationality and morality is demonstrated to create an honest deliberation of justice. However, despite this depiction of the American jury system, Rose raises an awareness of the questionable integrity and efficacy of the jurors and the jury system. On a deeper aspect, Rose underscores human subjectivity as the main inhibitor to a righteous judgment, whilst showcasing the solutions to combat this intrinsic nature. Through this, Rose elucidates his humanistic view to the audience that in order to achieve justice, one must not only approach judicial conflicts with humility but to also critically questioning…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    At the beginning he took charge in organizing and starting the discussion, and kept stuff in control and running. He didn't shout or disrupt, instead he waited his turn to speak and did so in a civil manner. Another instance of a leader was juror 8. Even when everyone was against his decision and was yelling at him, he didn't give in as he was confident in his reasons why the boy was not guilty. He did not switch sides during the whole debate and could prove his point through numerous examples and scenarios.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays