Roles In Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases. He was able to do so by actively listening to the not guilty party and giving them chances to speak without interruption. As a result of his action, Foreman can be classified in both the task roles and the maintenance role. The task role is …show more content…
He tried to see the positive side of every argument and can be exclaimed as the devil’s advocate and an information giver. He plays the devils advocated by throwing out possibilities of “what if this happened?”. He is also an information giver because he points out many of the perspective of the case that other jurors where blind to. His perspective on the case is driven by his self interest of justice. As long as there is a room for a reasonable doubt, Henry will defend the case.
Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own.
Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father. Most of the time he is a loud outspoken person with strong beliefs on his own opinions without looking at different perspectives. As a result he can be seen as the stage hog, because he wants to be heard by speaking loud and obnoxiously. He also does not let other jurors speak fully, because their opinions are not clearly important to him. As a result, it caused all the other jurors to turn their backs on him, while he was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the juror, Juror #3, passionately wanted to execute the young man for his deeds. This juror was unsympathetic due to his personal grudge. He did not have a good relationship with his son and his son left him; this young man reminded him of his son. Although Juror #3 insisted that he was basing his decision on facts, he brought personal matters into the jury even when the facts were refuted. The defendant exhibited similarities to Juror #3’s son, which led to the tendency of this juror to treat the defendant less favorably.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Juror 11 Important

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If your fate was to be peril wouldn't you want an opportunity to live it? Juror number eleven represents the best of our American justice system because he is open minded, fair, and he's experienced. Overall anyone who has their life on the line would want an individual such as juror eleven to be representing them for their futures sake. Juror eleven is shown was open minded when he claimed “We have a responsibility.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 is a bank clerk. A bank clerk usually has a lot of responsibilities like “recording and organizing loan information, preparing the monthly balance sheets of checking customers, and working on international accounts”(“Bank Clerk Job Description”). They also tend to work alone. It is Juror #2 ’s…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He is a nervous, unassertive bank teller. He claims the defendant is guilty hoping to avoid conflict with other, more opinionated jurors. They begin to review the evidence and discuss eye-witness accounts. The turning point comes when the jurors discuss how rare the knife is that is used in the murder. The architect carries the same knife, which he pulls from his pocket.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I respect his motives. The boy on trial is probably guilty, but i want to hear more. ( pg two8)” This illustrates that since juror 9 is the old/ wise one, he knows a thing or two about getting the support of others and that is why he voted “ not guilty”,so juror 8 won't immediately back down when he saw no one agreed with him. In addition, juror ten represents the racist in our society.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He is a leader which has ability to influence others person decision. He decision style is combination of directive and analytical. Juror 8 has forms alliance with juror 9, juror 11 and juror 2 which have ambiguous roles. His logical thinking and good team player able to guide the deliberations which other jurors agree with him. Establish good relationship and form a trust with jurors are one of the tactic of Juror 8 which able to change the results of the vote.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The end result was a unanimous jury decision. Facilitation allowed the group to stay focused on the task at hand and save an innocent man’s…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays