12 Angry Men Old Age Analysis

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… In his old age he is able to maintain quiet and observant disposition throughout the play which allows him to catch minor details which others may have overlooked. His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury. This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here. This is a quiet old man…newspapers.”(Act 1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making. …show more content…
His upbringing in a slum assisted him in reasoning with the other jurors’ of the innocence of the defendant. It is for this reason that he was able to explain the way to hold the switchblade knife. He says: “you don’t use this kind of knife that way.” (Act 2 page 49). Perhaps with the knowledge he has accumulated by living in a slum gives him an upper hand over the rest of the jurors’ as he can relate to it. Accordingly the 5th jurors background aids him in making a wise decision.

Ultimately, Rose has clearly explained that personal experience is an important aspect that influences the human decision-making processes. This is ascertained when the 3rd Juror’s agonizing experience with his son forces him to vote for guilty, the 9th juror’s old age grants him wisdom and insight and the 5th Juror’s life in a slum allows him to make a sound decision. Therefore personal experience is a very important factor that affects a person’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 wanted to explore the case because he was not certain. His uncertainty leads the play. Doubt gives possibility to other outlooks…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Prejudice In Juror 3

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the novel Juror 3 is aggressive and hostile towards the other jurors and the case. His aggression goes deeper than the case, and is stimulated by prejudice. Rose intends for Juror 3 to fuel on the discussion and evidence of the case by using his prejudice. Early on in the play we become aware that this is because of Juror 3's non-existent relationship with his son. At the start of the play Juror 3 holds a photo of his son and sadly says 'Kids... work your heart out...' referring to his son in an almost regretful tone.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses juror eight to show how standing with integrity helps gain the trust of peers. At first, eight stands alone in his opinion that the defendant is innocent; then, as he proves key pieces of evidence wrong, the other begin to trust him and his opinions and stand for the defendant. Finally, the person who stands alone is three, against the defendant and the others. Following juror eight Reginald Rose shows us how by standing up for the truth will grant us the trust of others. Reginald Rose shows that it is more important to stand for the truth with integrity rather than go with the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror Nine Essay

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the beginning, Juror nine is obviously not comfortable talking freely among his peers, but as the play goes on the reader can see his come out of his shell little by little. Juror nine’s description that was given to him at the beginning as “A mild gentle old man long since defeated by life and now merely waiting to die,” should be changed to the image of a wise strong voiced man not afraid to voice his thought with others. The person who reads “Twelve angry men” is not supposed to be persuaded that the young man is or isn’t guilty of the murder of the father, but they are supposed to think more about each juror and which one he or she is. When studying the jurors, the reader will want to say that they are like juror eight, but in all honesty, the reader is most likely one of the others.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite comments from other jurors, "Well, what's there to talk about? Eleven men here agree. Nobody had to think twice about it, except you" (Juror 7, page 12), Juror 8 still stood his ground. He didn't give in to peer pressure by accepting what the other jurors were telling him. Although the other jurors were already convinced of the their verdict before the discussion even began, Juror 8 knew he needed enough solid proof.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juror nine is the old man with a quiet nature, but with an insightful remarks. He is the supporter-encourager of the group because he lets juror eight speak his mind without any judgement. Even though his votes were different than juror eight, the old man believes every person should have their opinions heard out especially a person like juror eight who is taking a stand on his own. Juror ten is the garage owner who has regular anger outburst like juror three the angry father.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They are then challenged by the group leader, the architect. Another juror, who is a grumpy older man, calls architect a “bleeding heart”. He seems to have resentment against people who live in the slums. During this time, one juror asks the others to clarify their reasons for their guilty verdict to the architect, hoping the architect will change his mind. Shockingly, several of the jurors imply that the defendant being a poor, non-white, young man is reason enough for a conviction.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays