Why Is Juror 11 Important

Improved Essays
If your fate was to be peril wouldn't you want an opportunity to live it? Juror number eleven represents the best of our American justice system because he is open minded, fair, and he's experienced. Overall anyone who has their life on the line would want an individual such as juror eleven to be representing them for their futures sake. Juror eleven is shown was open minded when he claimed “We have a responsibility. This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are...ummmm... what is the word...Ah, notified! That we are notified by mail to come down to this place and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man we have not known before. We have nothing to gain or lose by our verdict. This is one of the reasons why we are strong. We should not make it …show more content…
If the gentleman wants to remain a secret-” (Reginald Rose 27) although he had been interrupted he also makes a point to say“Please. I would like to say something here. I have always thought that a man was entitled to have unpopular opinions in this country. This is the reason I came here. I wanted to have the right to disagree. In my own country, I am ashamed to say that…” (Reginald Rose 28). Through theses he purposes that ther not only does he respect the privacy of the other jurors but he also respects their opinions on the case, as he appreciates the opportunity to gain that respect himself.
Furthermore juror eleven hints that he empathizes to the others by saying “Please….i am used to this...it's alright. Thank you”. (Reginald Rose 47) also by directly saying "I can understand this sensitivity.” (Reginald Rose 48) the juror shows that he relates to injustice and gives the others all the more reason to swing their votes. These show how the juror can relate to the victim and how he takes the personal experience and relates it to the other jurors discrimination against the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Teleplay Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, a group of male jurors deliberate upon sentencing an eighteen year old to death for the supposed murder of his father; Similarly, in the story Trifles, by Susan Glaspell, the women play the de facto jurors of their pier. Upon taking their preliminary vote regarding the boys innocence the overwhelming majority of the male jurors voted guilty; however, as the jurors continue their deliberation the verdict begins to shift. This is because of juror number Eight, who is not satisfied with the guilty verdict because he does not know whether or not the boy is guilty. In Trifles, the male detectives seek out a criminal to punish and the women seek for insight as to what truly took place. While an ideal just verdict is wrought by truth, fairness, and reason, the men of this jury had settled for a false certainty.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And, as we learned in class, even if we know that culture is wrong and against our moral judgment, we do not want to stick out in a crowd. So, in a courtroom setting, attorneys know that racism and the injustices that it causes are morally wrong and they may not agree with it, but they often put personal beliefs aside once they step in the courtroom. Attorneys adjust to the setting that is put in place by the others in the courtroom (other attorneys, judges, sheriffs) so that they do not stick out and risk losing their case for their clients. It is a depressingly vicious cycle. This part of the book truly hit home because it was stated in such a way that was understandable and was something I could relate to.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    first time doing jury duty and he begins to face the opinions of many men, including the very forceful Juror #3. He is the first person to talk to Juror #2 about the case. He asks, “How’d you like it?” in which Juror #2 responds mildly, “I don’t know, it was pretty interesting”(Rose 7). Juror #3 then says that he was “falling asleep” and that he has done jury duty many times before and that it amazes him that lawyers can talk so much about nothing.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After voting for the first time, Juror Three proclaims, “When he was sixteen we had a battle. He hit me in the face. He's big, y'know. I haven't seen him in two years. Rotten kid” (Rose 18).…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important fact was the defendant’s ethnicity and low socioeconomic class. Most of the jurors were mostly middle-aged, white males from the middle-class status. These descriptions were different from the defendants, which made it difficult for the jurors to be sympathetic to the defendant. Juror #5, however, had experience living in a slum area, and so he could sympathize a little for the young man, and after several votes, he voted “not guilty” for the defendant. This example exhibits that if the juror are similar, the juror would tend to sympathize with the…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The importance given to their personal values and life experiences, in fact, played a crucial role in determining how fair, and conflicting the outcome of ethical decision making was, as initially, they were not giving the boy a chance to a fair trial. The juror’s job was to compare facts, look at the evidence discussing among themselves. By considering only the most obvious aspects in order to make a certain decision is never an ideal outcome or fair for the accused. Some jurors, especially number three was judging about the boy by comparing their circumstances with their own circumstances. They were especially looking for every negative circumstance to conclude the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays