In the play we have lots of disagreement which initiates doubt between the jurors. They work together to break apart the case and come to a conclusion. Juror 9 came up with a logical suggestion when he proposed that the woman who said that witnessed the murder had dents on her noses from wearing glasses but could not have proposed it without Juror 4’s help (Rose 69). By working together and expressing their thoughts, the jurors were able to come to a unanimous decision. If it were in a different perspective like first person point of view, it would not be reliable as we are capable to forget things that occurred. This way all characters are involved into the discussion and arguments which created
In the play we have lots of disagreement which initiates doubt between the jurors. They work together to break apart the case and come to a conclusion. Juror 9 came up with a logical suggestion when he proposed that the woman who said that witnessed the murder had dents on her noses from wearing glasses but could not have proposed it without Juror 4’s help (Rose 69). By working together and expressing their thoughts, the jurors were able to come to a unanimous decision. If it were in a different perspective like first person point of view, it would not be reliable as we are capable to forget things that occurred. This way all characters are involved into the discussion and arguments which created