Doubt In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
Theme is the most important part of a story because it is the message the author is trying to teach readers and they often use literary elements to demonstrate them to the readers One of the many themes is doubt. We are always trying to be right or we have opposing opinions with someone else and with that comes doubt. Doubt is the strongest theme in Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men in which he uses the character foils of Juror 3 and Juror 8 along with third person omniscient point of view, and authorial voice using Juror 8 to convey his theme. One of the first literary devices Rose uses is character foils. He decided to include character that were complete opposites. By doing this he was able to create doubt against all the jurors. It all started when Juror 8 raised his hand and voted “not guilty” and said, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’. It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it” (Rose 12). By having doubt and wanting to look at the case from multiple perspectives, Juror 8 was able to start a conversation and. On the other hand, Juror 3 seemed to be convinced as soon as he walked to the courtroom. In the …show more content…
In the play we have lots of disagreement which initiates doubt between the jurors. They work together to break apart the case and come to a conclusion. Juror 9 came up with a logical suggestion when he proposed that the woman who said that witnessed the murder had dents on her noses from wearing glasses but could not have proposed it without Juror 4’s help (Rose 69). By working together and expressing their thoughts, the jurors were able to come to a unanimous decision. If it were in a different perspective like first person point of view, it would not be reliable as we are capable to forget things that occurred. This way all characters are involved into the discussion and arguments which created

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rose exhibits the notion that prejudices and biases are factors in every conflict and can obscure the truth. The microcosm of characters ensures that each character has had different personal experiences, Personal experiences often influence the way reality is perceived by an individual, Prejudices and biases often take effect in conflict and can change the facts. The 3rd Juror has a bias against the boy as a result of personal experiences with his own son. Throughout the play, the 3rd Juror wants “to see [the] boy die because [he] personally wants it”, the 3rd Juror votes guilty throughout the play, the denouement of the play is met by the 3rd Juror realising that “it’s not [his] boy, he’s somebody [else’s].” The 10th Juror has a prejudice…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Twelve Angry Men”, is widely regarded as one of the greatest courtroom drama movies of all time and has received numerous film awards. Due to the film being set in a relatively uninteresting courtroom, the composer Reginald Rose desperately required the use of a myriad of dramatic techniques if he wished to successfully convey character emotions and dramatically reflect human experiences on stage. Rose carried out this task to the highest standard by virtue of three notable dramatic techniques. These techniques were, the use of time pressure consistently throughout the play to create tension, giving the characters emotion and backstory, whilst utilising the different mindsets of characters to create genuine intellectual conflict and…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his old age he is able to maintain quiet and observant disposition throughout the play which allows him to catch minor details which others may have overlooked. His observation of the old man witness demonstrates his own experience as an old man who has never been recognised until he was called to participate in a jury. This is affirmed when he says: “I think I know him better than anyone here. This is a quiet old man…newspapers. ”(Act…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The greatest biases that create the conflicts of the play are due to the juror’s past history. Everyone has their own story. Therefore, when one can relate to a story, their understanding will be greater than others. This may create a positive or negative opinion, such as Juror Three. Juror Three, a failed father not in contact with his son, is the main holdout against voting not guilty.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several of the jurors get up to see it better.)” (Rose 39). The actions of the jury demonstrate that although they might not care as much as they should for the boy since Juror #8 cares, they are willing to listen. Juror #8 argues the evidence given throughout the trial to prove not guilty with reasonable doubt. This sets both plays a part in the sense that John does not have supporting evidence to prove his ideas while Juror #8…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 8 Movie Analysis

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For the most part, each character I saw in the movie matched up with the picture my mind's eye had painted whilst I was reading the play. One thing irked me however: all the jurors seemed at least 10 years older that I had imagined them. For instance, I had seen Juror 8- the protagonist of the play and Juror 3- his rival, the antagonist as being perhaps 30-ish or so and spirited and vibrant in their arguments.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Crucible and 12 Angry Men are two plays that expressed the same theme of justice differently throughout each play. From their differing time periods and setting, both plays explore the justice system within society and the role people play within the system. Both 12 Angry Men and The Crucible have similarities, both plays have main characters that are attempting to right wrongs that they see being committed in their respected plays. Once the authors introduced the characters to us they then showed us how they implement the justice system in their plays and the effect it had on the plays societies. The outcome of these plays is different and they express varying effects the justice system can have on society.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Biases In 12 Angry Men

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Looking Glass of One’s Own Self People base their opinions through opinions they have learned through experience. Some take what parents or elderly people have taught them and apply it to their own life. This is one major way one makes decisions, as well as forming biases. With these developed biases people then come to a conclusion, solution, or verdict with any scenario thrown in their direction.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays