Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Juror #8
In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome. His profession might have been one of the reasons that the Juror was so analytical, organized and compartmentalized in his thinking. He had the ability to see things from different perspective and had the courage to act on his beliefs. He also had the ability
…show more content…
He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion).
After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors. Sensitive and soft spoken, he was nervous about expressing his feelings especially in front of his seniors. But at some instances when the other Jurors were stereotyping the defendant because he was from slum made him uncomfortable and he quotes- “I lived in a slum all my life, I used to play in the backyard that was filled with garbage. Maybe it still smells on me. There is something

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This juror is well-spoken and his way of thinking more on logical. He believed the accused as guilty because he had preconceived motions about people from the slums. He avoids the emotional arguments and engages in rational discussion. He changes his vote due to the witness's testimony is discredited. As a young man, Jack Klugman is afraid of expressing his opinion to the members of the group.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our judicial system is one that influences people of all walks of life and it has influenced people for generations, there is no escaping it. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #8 was able to convince the other jurors to believe that the boy was innocent, he convinced Juror #4, who then said, “I’m sorry. I’m convinced. I don’t think I’m wrong often but I guess I was this once. There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s fascinating to know that this show is more than just a “Murder Case”. It plays with your mind on who is right? This book wouldn’t be that “compelling” without Juror Eight who always kept going. Juror Eight is the hero of the play due to him convincing the other JUror’s that the boy was…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, the jury thinks the boy is guilty, but Juror 8 used relaxed tactics to change their minds. One of the last jurors to change his mind was Juror 3. In the beginning, he seemed unconvinced, but eventually, he Juror 8’s point unravel his prejudice. In addition, because of Juror 8’s civility, many jurors respected him. Juror 9 was one of the first jurors to show respect for Juror 8.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not a permanent solution though, and people go back to thinking that he is innocent. As a result he only gets more angry with juror eight and makes him think that the kid is guilty. Overall, juror number three is an angry man who only believes what he’s told himself to make him feel better. He only appreciates the opinions that he has believed all his life. He yells at people a lot when someone disagrees with him.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This man is practically the whole reason why everyone questions their decisions of the boy. He saw no reason as to why they shouldn’t sit in and talk a little about the case before shipping someone off to their death. Referring to figure 1, notice that Juror 8 is a speech bubble. He takes on this role due to the fact he was the only one not afraid to stand out and make an opinion upon the other eleven jurors. “There were eleven votes for guilty.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This makes him stands out in Maycomb and almost puts him ahead of his time although most people see it as a negative. He rises to the occasion in court for Tom stating that the jury should vote based on the testimonies and facts rather than the color of the defenses skin. He claims that it is unfair and that “This case should never have come to trial. This case is as simple as black and white.”(271) He also demonstrates these same policies outside the courthouse. When people who may not feel as if they are equals come over to the Finch’s house Atticus shows them that they are and makes them feel welcome.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957). This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The children are not racist and found it completely unfair and forced them to realize there are good people in this world like Atticus who does the jobs no one else is up to do and bad people that will let a man die because they can’t get over their own petty opinion. Next is the people of Maycomb, who originally the kids thought were the best people in the world, but now they think otherwise. They realized that most of the county is prejudice and full of gossip. The town makes good people like Boo and Atticus appear like the villains just because they’re doing what’s right. Finally is the fact Bob Ewell even tried to harm Scout and Jem.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haemon is taking Creon’s side at the beginning and then switches to convince Creon to forgive Antigone’s behavior. Haemon also brings up how people do not agree with Creon’s action, but Creon is so confident thinking that he is always right and better than everyone else especially women. Creon says that his son is a woman’s slave and that might not listen to Haemon’s appeal. Creon says, “If we must accept defeat, let it be from a man; we must not let people say that a woman beat us” (730-731). All Creon’s actions have shown the readers how confident and stubborn he is and implies that the character Creon is an antagonist of the…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays