Justice System In The Crucible And 12 Angry Men

Great Essays
The Crucible and 12 Angry Men are two plays that expressed the same theme of justice differently throughout each play. From their differing time periods and setting, both plays explore the justice system within society and the role people play within the system. Both 12 Angry Men and The Crucible have similarities, both plays have main characters that are attempting to right wrongs that they see being committed in their respected plays. Once the authors introduced the characters to us they then showed us how they implement the justice system in their plays and the effect it had on the plays societies. The outcome of these plays is different and they express varying effects the justice system can have on society. In 12 Angry Men, we see that …show more content…
Within each play, we see characters that bully other characters into believing or siding with their side. While we do have these characters in The Crucible and 12 Angry Men we also have one character in each play arguing for justice, to stop the execution of innocent people. In 12 Angry Men, we have Juror #8 who changes the other jurors minds slowly, the first change of voting happens when the foreman tallies the votes from the second vote. He says “ Guilty, Guilty, Guilty, Guilty, Guilty, Guilty. Please. Six guilty. Guilty, Guilty, Guilty. Not guilty. Guilty.” (Rose 26) Juror #8 was able to persuade another juror into believing that the boy was innocent of any crime. Juror #8 persuaded the other jurors by arguing the facts and making the other jurors see them in a new light. Juror #8 did not lie or bully the other juror to believe in his side of the story instead he argued the alternate facts of the case because Juror #8 is looking at the case from as unbiased a view as he can attempt. Juror #8 is trying to offer the boy compassion and fairness instead of mistrust and hatred like some of the other jurors. In The Crucible, Abigail demanded the other girls listen to her and she told them this, “Let either of you breather a work, or the edge of a word, about the other thing, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.” …show more content…
Our judicial system is one that influences people of all walks of life and it has influenced people for generations, there is no escaping it. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #8 was able to convince the other jurors to believe that the boy was innocent, he convinced Juror #4, who then said, “I’m sorry. I’m convinced. I don’t think I’m wrong often but I guess I was this once. There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death. Our judicial system worked in this play and we received a fair verdict for the boy that was charged. However, The Crucible ended differently, eventually leading John Proctor to say, “ You have made your magic now, for now, I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor. Not enough to wave a banner with, but white enough to keep it from such dogs.” (Miller 144) Proctor is saying here that by keeping silent and not admitting to a crime he didn’t commit it makes him a better person, he has kept his soul and not sold it to save his himself. He will not be persuaded to abandon who he is but stand by the fact that he knows he is innocent and the people who are sending him to be hung are the real witches. In both plays, the justice system has an

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The “Hero” of the play or the person who convinced every Juror that the boy was Not-guilty is Juror Eight. Juror Eight is the hero of the play because of him convincing the other juror’s that the evidence was false and proving the “Old man’s” view of what happened false. changes the other Juror’s minds as well. In some ways Eight did bring a good point making the evidence false. There were two witnesses during the murderer case.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957). This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case. Without the actions of Juror 8, the boy would have been convicted of the crime and accused for something he may not have done. Reginald Rose has used his film, Twelve Angry Men, to critique the jury system by pointing out the flaws present. Racism, personal biases, unwillingness to cooperate and accusing someone incorrectly were all obstacles that each of the jurors had to face to reach the final verdict. It is with these factors that one can critique the jury system and judge whether or not the system is really doing us…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play, 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, the characters of this story appear to be nothing more than average people picked to stand and listen to a case of a boy accused of homicide. As the characters are supposed to leave personal issues at the door of the case, some appear to use them against the boy. Using these imperfect jurors, people can see how that when insecurities, flaws, and the law form together, the justice system can be found. The justice system is neither perfect nor is it imperfect. To sum it up, is people are put to the test of humanity to decide what must become of the case.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8th Juror Analysis

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror #8 used a very calm and orderly way, but other Jurors example Jurors 3 and 10 used a very aggressive and inappropriate way to argue against the 8th juror and why the defendant is guilty. Other jurors were not the happiest when they found out they had to go through the testimonies and evidence. They wanted a quick or “Fast vote” as how juror #7 expressed. It was heroic and brave of Juror #8 to speak out against 11 other jurors and go by why he thinks the defendant is not guilty and think through every step and give every evidence an explanation and stick to having a…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This juror is well-spoken and his way of thinking more on logical. He believed the accused as guilty because he had preconceived motions about people from the slums. He avoids the emotional arguments and engages in rational discussion. He changes his vote due to the witness's testimony is discredited. As a young man, Jack Klugman is afraid of expressing his opinion to the members of the group.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 8 acted as if he knew he was correct but did not have much evidence to back himself up, he stood up for himself based on reasonable doubt. Atticus also stood up for the innocent in tense situations. Juror 8 used his reasonable doubt to prove the boy innocent, just like Atticus Finch did, showing they have alike personalities and motives. By comparing Juror 8 and Atticus’s empathy, arguments, and compassion we learn that they share similar characteristics and motives. Due to Juror eight and Atticus’s empathy it showed that they cared.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civility will encourage your opponents to keep listening to you. The play Twelve Angry Men shows that civility is important. By the end of the play, the jurors were willing to listen to the people who were the most rational. Juror 8 calmly took the others' ideas into account, which swayed the jury to favor not guilty. At first, the jury thinks the boy is guilty, but Juror 8 used relaxed tactics to change their minds.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More jurors change their vote to not guilty. They then prove that it is possible for the boy to forget his alibi when under pressure. Additionally, they question the way the father was stabbed, saying that it is unlikely that the boy who was shorter than his dad would have stabbed the dad the way he was stabbed. This changes more jurors’ votes to not guilty. Few remaining jurors have not changed their vote.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 8 used his brain and common sense to place a vote. Later in the play, Juror 9 also votes innocent and is harshly criticised by the other 10 jurors. To their demanding questions, Juror 9 simply replies, “Well, it’s not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of others” (Rose, Act I, pg. 28) referring to how Juror 8 was courageous to stand up for what he believes is right. Throughout the play, Juror 8 is shown to act on his conscious and value of human life to come to conclusions on the trial of events rather than to judge defendant based on his background which is how the other jurors proceed to come to conclusions.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays