Reginald Rose's Use Of Tension In Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
The play “Twelve Angry Men”, is widely regarded as one of the greatest courtroom drama movies of all time and has received numerous film awards. Due to the film being set in a relatively uninteresting courtroom, the composer Reginald Rose desperately required the use of a myriad of dramatic techniques if he wished to successfully convey character emotions and dramatically reflect human experiences on stage. Rose carried out this task to the highest standard by virtue of three notable dramatic techniques. These techniques were, the use of time pressure consistently throughout the play to create tension, giving the characters emotion and backstory, whilst utilising the different mindsets of characters to create genuine intellectual conflict and …show more content…
He carries this out in the relatively simple fashion of a clock. Many members of the Jury simply wish to conclude the trial and be allowed to leave so the eighth Juror sets a time limit of seven o’clock ( p.55) and agrees to call a “hung Jury” if they cannot reach a decision. Like many other well-known plays when time is added to the equation the stakes are always raised which helps to further entertain and immerse the audience in the story. Reginald manipulates time in this fashion as it allows for him to accurately represent the pressure a human being would feel in a Jury room. Reginald not only manipulates time as a means of tension however he also implements it by setting the play in “real time” so the time taken on stage is identical to the time the audience takes to watch. This causes the audience to feel as if they were the Jurors on stage and enables them to profoundly experience what it would be like to decide the fate of a boy’s life. Both these dramatic techniques utilise time in such a way that it allows Reginald to dramatically reflect human …show more content…
One particular scene articulates this concept beautifully, on (p.59) the vote is eleven to one for not guilty and Juror stands alone. Despite everything he refuses to change his vote as he believes that the defendant is like his son who “betrayed” him when he was sixteen years old. This scene shows his apparent prejudice to the young and it takes the eighth Jurors words of “It’s not your son let him live” to finally sway

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people in the jury voted the suspect as guilty, so anyone who does not know will vote guilty to prevent controversy between the people who think the boy is guilty. Lastly, another example is when the 12 men (jury) would yell at each other. The person who yelled at everyone, would get everyone’s attention and stop everyone else from…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses juror eight to show how standing with integrity helps gain the trust of peers. At first, eight stands alone in his opinion that the defendant is innocent; then, as he proves key pieces of evidence wrong, the other begin to trust him and his opinions and stand for the defendant. Finally, the person who stands alone is three, against the defendant and the others. Following juror eight Reginald Rose shows us how by standing up for the truth will grant us the trust of others. Reginald Rose shows that it is more important to stand for the truth with integrity rather than go with the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At one point the Foreman notes that the conversation is getting out of hand and says “Ok, let’s stop the yelling. who’s got something constructive to say?”(27). This is immediately acted upon by all the Jurors because no one really wants to be there longer than they have to. The most important difference to note here is that nobody wants to spend an excessive amount of time there, but they are also not willing to sacrifice their personal beliefs to leave sooner which is an important distinction to…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The myriad of ethical dilemmas presented throughout the film is hidden layer behind the acting, the inner turmoil and strife with each character as they struggle to overcome their personal flaws and beliefs is what truly draws the audience into this masterful production. This paper will draw those turmoil’s to the surface, confronting and analyzing what makes them so tantalizing. “…stories are an excellent way to illustrate how difficult a moral problem can be” (Rosenstand, p.g. 54) 12 Angry Men is an excellent story that teaches several important ethical and moral standpoints all of them very difficult to grasp. The first of these is how to deal with moral differences, the ethics of justice and how dangerous the concept of greatest happiness or Utilitarianism…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their choice would either send an 18-year-old Hispanic man to death or set him free. When the twelve men were locked in the deliberation room, the jury foreman acted as the facilitator for the group. It was the jury foreman that got everyone focused for the initial vote. It was important get everyone focused because the group was busy discussing their personal life, occupations, and their future plans. They were not discussing the case because they assumed everyone would vote the same.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Christmas Carol Critique

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Intricate details on the scenery made the buildings feel authentic and inviting, grabbing my attention from the moment I walked in the theatre. The costuming was also fantastic, portraying the time period well and adding even more authenticity to the production. All of these individual aspects of a play production acted as an important role, but none of them caught my attention as much as the storyline. I was entwined in the story from the moment the stage lights came on, engulfing myself in the man-made atmosphere presented in front of me. The story went on to tell a tale of a greedy…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics