Rene Descartes Skepticism Analysis

Improved Essays
To be a skeptic is to have “an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object” (“Skepticism”). Skepticism is a strong theme throughout the philosophical works of both René Descartes and David Hume. In Descartes’s Discourse on Method he bases all of his philosophical reasoning on the principle of doubting all prior accepted knowledge and questioning everything. In Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume raises his doubts about Descartes’s ideas about skepticism, stating his belief that moderate skepticism is more productive than radical doubt. Based on their opinions in their most prolific works, Descartes is shown to be a greater skeptic than Hume is because Descartes is skeptical …show more content…
Descartes philosophies grew from his discontent with the Jesuit education he was raised with. He decided to fix this dissatisfaction by following his own “method”. The first step of this method was “never to accept anything as true that [he] did not plainly know to be such” (Descartes 11). Descartes built his whole philosophy on life around the principle of skepticism. Descartes decided that he would not believe anything to be true that he had not thought through himself; he refuses to accept any information that is just given to him. Then throughout his whole Discourse, Descartes goes more in depth on what he is still skeptical of even after he has thought through for himself. Descartes said that “because the senses sometimes deceive us, [he] wanted to suppose that nothing was exactly as they led us to imagine” (Descartes 18). While Hume is also largely skeptical of the world around him, he is skeptical to a much lesser degree than Descartes, shown through his disdain for Descartes’s radical doubt. In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume talks about his belief that radical doubt is an unfeasible way to think about the world, saying, “ … “ (Hume ). Although Hume does not believe in the necessity of doubting everything, he is in favor of being moderately skeptical of Additionally, Hume believes in many of the things Descartes was skeptic of in Discourse on

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes championed the notion of working from doubt, and this superficially seems very similar to the scientific process of disproving an hypothesis. But if Descartes had truly wanted to answer the question of viable external objectivity, he ought to have started from the notion of the objective world and worked in toward the subjective understanding. In order to demonstrate what I mean by this, let’s take an example from modern artificial intelligence…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the passage from Descartes’ Meditation, the conclusion is that Descartes now has reason to doubt all of his beliefs including those of his senses. The premises seem to be: (1) If an omnibenevolent god wouldn’t deceive us then there must be an evil demon doing so. (2) If an evil demon is our source of deception then one cannot know true beliefs. In the passage from Sweetman’s “The Pseudo-Problem of Skepticism” the conclusion is that we should not take the problem of skepticism seriously because we have no reasons to do so. The premises seem to be: (1) We know that it is not possible to be a brain in a vat.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Witch say’s if he has reason to doubt something, then he isn’t going to accept it as knowledge, and he isn’t going to use it. Rene Descartes now says that he isn’t…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A challenge to Skepticism Through Hilary Putnam's “Brains in a Vat” argument, he aims to refute the idea of philosophical skepticism introduced by René Descartes. At the conclusion of the first meditation in his First Meditations on Philosophy, Descartes argues that an evil demon may be artificially creating all of our life experiences. Through his hypothesis, Descartes exemplifies philosophical skepticism of the existence of an external world. Ideas, life events, experiences and beliefs that seem to be acquired from interactions with the external physical world are merely illusions created by a deceptive, evil demon. Although Descartes presents a compelling argument for his skepticism of our perceived ideas, it has been argued that his argument cannot stand because of its self-refutation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes bases all of his opinions from his reasoning only, filtering out any bias lies as the skeptic would. In Hume’s case, his knowledge comes from the senses. The skeptic’s knowledge also comes from the senses and experience. What Empiricus is implying when he says that he who chooses the opinion that is good or bad is continually disturbed, is that the further man believes things to be true the more likely it is for him to constantly wonder what it would be like if he was wrong. A skeptic is neither wrong nor right, which has…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the worldview of the skeptic, if there is a skeptical hypothesis for something, then that certain thing could not be known. If I were to hold the belief that the grass is green, a skeptic would say, “well, how do you know that grass is actually there? It could be a projection of your imagination. How can I be certain that how you see green is the same way I see green?” The skeptic’s insistence upon certainty in knowledge is challenged for except the knowledge that you yourself exists.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes argues that man has reason and is therefore able to think and think rationally. Hume’s theory, for Descartes, would probably lower man to the level of animals as many philosophers at that time believed that animals only have a base nature reacting and acting towards their environment requiring no rationality. Descartes would probably argue with Hume on the meaning of the self and personal identity. For Descartes, Hume is wrong in the fact that because of our ability to formulate ideas from our own mind is significant proof that Hume cannot deny. Hume cannot refute that we can have consistent and coherent thoughts that follow each other often.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, philosophers have been known to use skepticism as a method to justify their theories of existence and knowledge. Such philosophers like Descartes who wrote in his meditations that by doubting everything one is able to establish a foundation based upon certainty. However, others philosophers like G.E Moore and Barry Stroud reject Descartes and continue on to explain their foundations and ideas on the connection between knowledge and existence. Certainty and The Problem of the External World are both works that focus on the notion of how knowledge does not need to be justified through skepticism in order to be proven certain.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of these questions, the two schools of philosophy were formed. Rene Descartes and David Hume are two of the most well-known philosophers of epistemology. Descartes was a rationalist who claimed to possess a special method to form a well-rounded method of doubt, which was exhibited in his many studies of mathematics, natural philosophy and metaphysics. Hume was an empiricist who is generally known as one of the most important philosophers in English writing. Descartes idea of rationalism argued that reason and logic form the basis of knowledge; believing that knowledge originates in the mind and it cannot be formed within the senses.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays