Comparison Of Rene Descartes And David Hume And Epistemology

Improved Essays
Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality. As a result of these questions, the two schools of philosophy were formed.
Rene Descartes and David Hume are two of the most well-known philosophers of epistemology. Descartes was a rationalist who claimed to possess a special method to form a well-rounded method of doubt, which was exhibited in his many studies of mathematics, natural philosophy and metaphysics. Hume was an empiricist who is generally known as one of the most important philosophers in English writing. Descartes idea of rationalism argued that reason and logic form the basis of knowledge; believing that knowledge originates in the mind and it cannot be formed within the senses. According to Descartes, even God himself was a matter of
…show more content…
However, neither has been found truer than the other. Essentially, there is no right or wrong answer. Based on modern scientific views, some may believe that Hume’s ideas have the edge over Descartes. However it does seem ironic considering that Descartes believed that knowledge was only gained through logic and scientific method. His very methods were in turn used against him to prove that his ideas on human understanding have been used to debunk his ideas about

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________ Reading Questions A Discourse on Method 1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Or is it John Locke with his theory of consciousness? Both men are famous for their views on the matter, and both pose very interesting ideas. On the surface their views seem quite similar, both men believed our experiences shape us. However, Locke believes that our experiences are what embody the “self” and Hume believes that because of our experiences it would be impossible see a true “self”. So, which philosopher makes the best argument?…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Descartes argues that although animals are living, organic creatures, they are essentially automata, like mechanical robots. On the other hand, Hume asserts that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events through experience, rather than through means of reason. While both Descartes and Hume hold juxtaposed positions on animal behavior,…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Epistemology is the philosophical genre that seeks to establish a ubiquitous concept of knowledge. Within epistemology, the task of defining knowledge arouses controversial queries: what constitutes knowledge, how does one separate belief from knowledge and how does one justify what one knows? An epistemological issue of knowledge is presented by French philosopher, René Descartes. According to Descartes, “it is impossible for us to know whether we are in a waking state or a dreaming state”. Essentially, Descartes purposes that one cannot delineate the difference between having a dream and being awake.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sheyla Vera Phil 106 Fall 2015 Descartes vs Hume Even though all philosophers claim to have different set of ideas and theories they all basically begin questioning the same thing. From one’s existence, gods existence, and the existence of the soul apart from the body. They all, in some way or another, have argued whether or not another philosopher’s theories are valid or not. When this happens we, as the readers, see the flaws that the previous theory had and then the possible flaws another philosopher might make when argue on the validity of a theory. Hume and Descartes are two philosophers who have argued on how we have come to know what we claim is truth in reference to knowledge, amongst other ideas pertaining to the mind.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As time passes, knowledge becomes more complex and philosophers start to develop different theories regarding how people come about this knowledge. There is a distinct difference between both Rationalism and Empiricism and both Descartes and Locke have found ways to discredit and support both views. Descartes argument towards Rationalism is much stronger than Hume's argument towards Empiricism. There is quite the distinction between both empiricism and rationalism. The major difference between rationalism and empiricism concerns their knowledge basis.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Something which can be difficult to distinguish when reading the Meditations is whether Descartes is talking about truth in its purest sense or reality. In the second meditation, he argues that when looking to establish truth we need to accept that we exist otherwise we cannot judge the truth in anything else. But this can be confusing as he is relating truth and reality and equalling them to each other. If Descartes here, is referring to the idea of reality he is arguing that for us to judge the reality of anything else, we must admit that through our ability to think for ourselves and rationalise, we must be real. However, if he is referring to truth, then he is using the truth of our own thoughts to rationalise the truth of all else.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes argues that man has reason and is therefore able to think and think rationally. Hume’s theory, for Descartes, would probably lower man to the level of animals as many philosophers at that time believed that animals only have a base nature reacting and acting towards their environment requiring no rationality. Descartes would probably argue with Hume on the meaning of the self and personal identity. For Descartes, Hume is wrong in the fact that because of our ability to formulate ideas from our own mind is significant proof that Hume cannot deny. Hume cannot refute that we can have consistent and coherent thoughts that follow each other often.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays