David Hume's Objection To The Cosmological Argument

Improved Essays
The term epistemology is the theory of knowledge of how it is attained and confirmed, and it is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion. One of the most influential philosophers of epistemology is David Hume. He is also a skeptic who believes that many people are conceived by the things they think they know which fails them to perceive the truth. In the following, I will be explaining about how Hume argue against religion using objection to the cosmological argument, argument from design or the teleological argument, and ontological argument.
To begin with some brief history of David Hume, Hume is one of the greatest philosophers who believe there is more depth to what lies beyond the mind so-called knowledge. Hume was born in Edinburg in 1711 to a poor family. He went to the
…show more content…
He is convinced that if the world is created then it is also possible that it could be done by many gods rather than a God, next is that because the world and the creations are not perfect, there must be something lacking with the God himself and the last argument is that the existence of evil when the God is known to be all good. One of the example Hume used was, if we see a house then we know that there is an architect behind it although we have never seen or told that there was an architect who builds this because of our prior knowledge of having been seen to architects structuring and the results are the houses we live in. But, to compare the example to the universe is impossible because of its greatness and its complexity. Humans have never witnessed in their lives of seeing God creating the universe and the world. For this reason, Hume argues that human cannot simply make an assumption that God is the creator of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He argues that the analogy between the universe and human creations, such as machines is weak, since the universe is not really as obviously similar to a machine as the argument claims. The arrangement, composition, and workings of the universe are extremely different from a man-made machine. He explains that even a single and small difference between the effects of two things can reveal great differences between the causes. This refutation of the argument is plausible, since it shows that an argument from analogy only works effectively when the things we're comparing are extremely similar, but the universe is totally different from a machine or watch. Also, Hume argues that we have only limited exposure to a part of the universe, yet we're taking attributes based on imperfect observations of that small part, such as order, design, and intelligence and using them to make a claim about the whole universe.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, because human artifacts so closely resemble the more complicated universe a higher intelligent being must have created the universal for humans to model their intelligent design after. Hume, on the other hand, argues that the universe does not appear sufficiently similar enough to human design to support this premise. Additionally, there exist no other universes for us to compare this assumption too. Therefore, we cannot gain a definitive answer on whether the universe was designed by a creator or merely developed on its own. Finally, Hume argued, that the universe is as full of disorder as it is order, therefore the argument for a grand designer remains weak.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Among several criticisms to the argument, Hume argues that the existence of an intelligent designer needs explaining in and of itself (Speaks, 2006). This argument highlights a flaw in the theory of teleological arguments in that it creates an infinite loop of possibilities. How did God come to be, does he have an intelligent designer? One can follow that logic to infinity. Another criticism Hume outlines is the simple lack of evidence to support the theory.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am going to argue that Blackburn is wrong to claim that the existence of evil strongly suggest that there does not exist a god who is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful. Exposition - Words (189) Blackburn's argument is that the three characteristics normally attributed to God in any given religion is that he is all powerful, all knowing, and all caring, but that these three qualities cannot resolve itself with the presence of evil in the world. Since evil does exist and is indisputably a part of the world that exists, the characteristics of God must mold itself around its existence. If God is all powerful, then evil only exists at his command.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zayd Boucaud Professor Sarah Allen Philosophy December 4, 2017 "Cleanthes' Argument from Design" This essay will divulge into the deeper meaning of Cleanthes’ argument from design, with an explanation of not only his views, but the opposition’s as well (with a further understanding about why his argument may be proven invalid.) Cleanthes’ premises (leading to his valid conclusion) will have further, more simple explanations that will show his own reasoning in favor of God’s existence.) Flaws in his argument will be displayed subsequently, which will lead to the conclusion of his argument overall: ample validity but simply lacking soundness.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion is a matter of personal belief, faith, or dogma. The majority of religions are centered on the existence of one or more gods. The existence of God, or multiple gods, is a priori truth- no observation can show that God does not exist. However, there is also no observation that prove that God does exist. This dilemma has driven many philosophers to propose numerous arguments against and for the existence of God.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the middle of the 17th century, thinkers in the enlightenment began to question how belief in the existence of a monotheistic God could be rationally supported. A number of arguments for and against the existence of God emerged at this time, and while the philosophical debate on the existence of God is still in session, the initial dust has settled. At this point in time, it is abundantly clear that a the cosmological argument is untenable at both a metaphysical and empirical level, and that the various versions of the cosmological argument fail to support the existence of God. There is good reason for critically examining the cosmological argument. Theists have made a claim that God exists.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume was a skeptical empiricist born in Scotland in 1711. They have used their brain power to write various literature discussing whether the design we perceive points towards God or not. Aquinas and Paley take the side of there being design, while Hume sees flaws in the argument, and brings them to attention. Aquinas, the Dominican monk, believed in God. At first, Aquinas talks about two different…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although the arguments set forth by these philosophers are considered the “most complete, forceful, and cogent presentation of the Cosmological Argument we possess,” there were skeptics that challenged the philosophers’ reasoning (Rowe 51). In particular, philosopher David Hume read the argument and attacked virtually every premise that was set forth. Humes divides his arguments into three main ideas, but focusing on his first and more prominent argument, Humes attacks the way the Cosmological Argument is structured. As stated, the Cosmological Argument creates the impression that there has to be a reason for everything, but Humes criticizes this reasoning by stating that existent beings do not need to have a reason or even a cause for their existence. For example, visualize a set of dominoes standing up that is ordered in a straight line.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume believes that we cannot conclude that similar causes from unrelated effect. Which is lead to thinking that Hume believes that causes and effect has to be analogous to each other. In his other book, Causation, Hume states that humans cannot possibly place a cause and a random effect in any fashion without experience. Hume stated from Causation, “Were a man, such as Adam, created in the full vigor of understanding, without experience, he would never be able to infer motion in the second ball from the motion and impulse of the first” (Hume, C., 178). It seems like in Analogy and the Argument from Design, that Cleanthes, Demea, and Philo is connecting the universe with other items and ideas, but they could not possibly know for sure because they never experience it.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Before bringing Hume into the picture, it is important to first examine how scientific findings like Zaki et al. ’s rely on faith: Zaki et al. must believe the findings from previous papers regarding the functions of the neural regions, namely orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens, to assess their data and to come up with their explanation. Upon closer evaluation, it becomes evident that Zaki et al.’s conclusions rely on testimonies reported by others, which is coincidentally a topic vividly explored by Hume.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result of these questions, the two schools of philosophy were formed. Rene Descartes and David Hume are two of the most well-known philosophers of epistemology. Descartes was a rationalist who claimed to possess a special method to form a well-rounded method of doubt, which was exhibited in his many studies of mathematics, natural philosophy and metaphysics. Hume was an empiricist who is generally known as one of the most important philosophers in English writing. Descartes idea of rationalism argued that reason and logic form the basis of knowledge; believing that knowledge originates in the mind and it cannot be formed within the senses.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sheyla Vera Phil 106 Fall 2015 Descartes vs Hume Even though all philosophers claim to have different set of ideas and theories they all basically begin questioning the same thing. From one’s existence, gods existence, and the existence of the soul apart from the body. They all, in some way or another, have argued whether or not another philosopher’s theories are valid or not. When this happens we, as the readers, see the flaws that the previous theory had and then the possible flaws another philosopher might make when argue on the validity of a theory. Hume and Descartes are two philosophers who have argued on how we have come to know what we claim is truth in reference to knowledge, amongst other ideas pertaining to the mind.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays