Descartes Vs Locke Essay

Improved Essays
Descartes v. Locke Rene Descartes and John Locke are two philosophers of the 17th century who study on what the self is and how the mind and body are associated together. Although Descartes and Locke share some ideas, they do have different and significant examples explaining their beliefs. Rene Descartes has 6 Meditations in a treatise written by himself called “Meditations on First Philosophy” in which 3 are important. Two of the important Meditations are the 5th and 6th Meditations and they talk about the essence and existence of material things. Additionally, the 2nd Meditation was important in which Descartes brings a specific example involving wax in which there are 2 qualities; primary and secondary. Locke, who interpreted Descartes’ …show more content…
At the point the wax melted, Descartes discovered the different smell, looks, and feels but he knew that it was still considered wax. He concluded from that point that an object that changes is still an object and that we rely on our senses and mind to decipher what is really in front of us. We as humans see things take up space in this world meaning they are physical. We as humans see things in our minds and they do not appear in front of us, so, they are not physical. As a result, there is a strong reason as to why we know material objects and that is because they have 2 qualities; primary and secondary. Primary qualities will not be affected by your mind and secondary qualities will be. An example of a primary quality is that if someone sees a cube, it cannot be argued that it will be a sphere meaning that it is a fact, so it cannot be changed by the mind. Secondary qualities can be changed based on senses or mind because of experience. We see blue, but with experience we transcribe that blue as Navy Blue; the secondary qualities can be changed. Having the primary qualities and secondary qualities of the wax (physical object) change is what Descartes explained as our mind recognizing the essence of the wax, and identifying it even if it changes physically. If something is changing physically in front of us, then that it is a material

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Rene Descartes a) Rene Descartes believes that things exist simply because he thinks, therefore he is. This is beautifully illustrated when he gives us the wax example. Before giving that example, Rene Descartes did state that our senses are deceptive and so is our imagination. If we were to go by that, does that mean we exist just because we perceive it through our senses?…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is very reliant on the senses, which is ironic when Descartes is specifically trying to condemn the senses as a reliable form of observation. He questions, “So what was there in the wax that was so distinctly grasped?...for whatever came under the senses has now changed, and yet the wax remains” (Descartes, 67). That is, even though its properties changed, the wax remains wax, not some other substance. This therefore causes him to postulate that “the perception of the wax is neither a seeing, nor a touching, nor an imagining...rather it is an inspection on the part of the mind alone.” He cedes that this inspection can be “imperfect and confused” but the mind is ultimately right, since it knew the wax was the same substance throughout the experiment, even through the faulty classifications of the senses (Descartes, 68).…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    he most crucial view of deists is the idea that God is a transcendent being that left the world on its own after creation and has no concern in the affairs of man. John Locke makes statements in The Reasonableness of Christians. If Locke was a deist, he would have to accept this fact. But Locke does not agree with this view of God. This is what Locke said “But further, this question, Who shall judge?…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Metamorphosis

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes decides to take a piece of wax and examines it. He examines the essential qualities of the wax for to see what to smell is the texture, the shape, and its color. This is something as simple as learning how to use one sense to examine objects. So, when he melts the wax it changes the physical state of the wax. Descartes discussion with the piece of wax becomes to the realization of that the wax can change.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plato supposed that the body belongs to the physical universe made of imperfect changing material, whereas the mind/soul exists in a metaphysical realm made of perfect ideas. Similarly, Descartes claims that there two kinds of substances: the physical matter (E.g. the body) and the metaphysical (E.g. mind/soul). He then concluded that because these substances are separate, they must have distinct essential properties to one and other. The body can be seen as physical, within space time, doubtable and the body decays.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretia Field 001691599 Philosophy 1101 Paper 2 The Meditations on First Philosophy by Rene Descartes examines the way in which material objects are observed through cognitive understanding through the senses and what is known about the world. In the second meditation, Descartes examines the nature of the mind and how it relates to the physical observed properties. The specific example which is used in this meditation is the example of a ball of wax which, when melted changes in all observable ways and yet is still identifiable as the same wax. The meditator reasons that since there are innumerable conditions pertaining to how it is sensed which can be met by a single object, there must be something which is inherent in the mind of the…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although both philosophers believe in a State of Nature, they do not necessarily believe in the same concepts within the theory. In Locke’s…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore I believe that Locke would applaud Descartes use of knowledge and abstraction in sorting out his ideas on identities, God, and the link between existence and the truth. Used as a foundational point to build knowledge,…

    • 1319 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Position Descartes believes in what is called “substance dualism”. Substance dualism means trusting in the viewpoint that substances come in both physical and immaterial forms. He believed that the…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Wax Paradox

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes uses his reflection on the piece of wax as a way to argue what our senses and imagination lack. Descartes’ argument is that our senses and imagination lack the ability to grasp the extendibility, flexibility, and changeability of wax, specifically in his explanation, but more generally any body “we touch and see” (30). Ones intellect is the only thing that can perceive the nature of a body, such as the wax. The observation of the wax from the original state to the state after being placed near the fire brings up the question “But does the same wax remain”(30). Descartes knows that the senses cannot distinguish that the two different states of the wax are the same wax, “Evidently none of the features which I arrived at by means of the senses: for whatever came under taste, smell, sight, touch or hearing has now altered- yet the wax remains”(30).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Elizabeth asks how the mind can interact with the body if it lies in a different realm of existence. No part of Descartes’ Meditations has a satisfying answer to how two distinct substances can casually affect one another. Elizabeth’s objection seems devastating at first but the problem it calls into question is not an error of logic from Descartes, but one of insufficient explanation. Descartes in his own rebuttal to her may utterly fail to explain the manner in which the mind interacts with the body despite them being separate substances; but this still does not present any logical error. The fact that the mechanism of the interaction is unknown doesn’t prevent them from interacting or existing as distinct.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He creates this way of thinking that senses can change over different phases and ideas cannot just disappear from our minds. He is right about the fact of changing the matter of an object and still having that idea of what that particular object was before it was changed is from your mind. He gives valid reasons, however he has many weaknesses to his argument. In the textbook, Classical Philosophical Questions, Descartes says that “…if an idea is “clear” if its content includes the nature and essence of it” (195).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays