The Wax Example Of Rene Descartes

Improved Essays
1) Rene Descartes
a) Rene Descartes believes that things exist simply because he thinks, therefore he is. This is beautifully illustrated when he gives us the wax example. Before giving that example, Rene Descartes did state that our senses are deceptive and so is our imagination. If we were to go by that, does that mean we exist just because we perceive it through our senses? He concludes no. His explanation of existence is that he is just a “thing” which thinks and because of that he is the “I”. Rene Descartes tells us that we are just a thing with the capacity to doubt, understand, conceive, affirm, deny, will, refute, and a thing that can imagine and feel. He concludes that we exist by the understanding only, not because of our sense, but
…show more content…
In this meditation, Rene wanted to clarify what this “I” is and this “thing that thinks”. Rene Descartes comes to the conclusion that he is not only something that thinks, understands and has a will but he has something that imagines and has senses. That being said, he also stated that our senses cannot be trusted either. He states and believed that our senses can be deceiving, they could be dreams and lastly, they can be purely evil. In addition, our imagination cannot be trusted as well. He uses the wax example to illustrate how we come to know of a piece of was just taken from a honeycomb. Do we know a piece of wax through our sense or by other means? At first, he tells us that we can know about the piece of wax by means of our senses: its taste, smell, color, shape, size, hardness, etc. He then tells us what would happen if the piece of wax where to go near fire and was melted. All of these sensible qualities, that we can feel, change. Its shape and size would change and also its hardness would change and become soft. Despite all those changes, Rene Descartes concludes that the same piece of wax remains. Therefore, regarding knowledge through our senses, he believes that knowledge cannot come through our senses because if something were to change, such as the wax, its sensible properties would have changed. Because of this, he also states that we cannot come to know this through our sense and neither our imagination. Our imagination can change into an infinite amount of numbers and shapes. After examining all these options, he concludes that he knows the wax by means of intellect. He believed that the mind knows better than the body. While sense can deceive us, and imaginations cannot be trusted, the mind can be trusted and knows

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes argues that there are varying degrees of reality. At the bottom, there are Modes that depend on finale substances for their existence (the color of a chair or a shape). Above the modes are Finate Substances, including us, trees, and tables. At the top are Infinite Substances or God. Each type must come from somewhere as you cant get something out of nothing.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes can demonstrate the validity of his arguments, specifically through the use of the wax example, and ultimately has a larger framework of philosophical reasoning underlying his position than that of Montaigne. Further, Montaigne’s argument is weakened by his initial assumption that all knowledge comes from the senses. Descartes, by finding that the senses can be trusted, defeats this assumption as well as Montaigne’s…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Witch say’s if he has reason to doubt something, then he isn’t going to accept it as knowledge, and he isn’t going to use it. Rene Descartes now says that he isn’t…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the essence of the wax can be known by either: a) the senses or b) the imagination or c) the intellect. To conclude that the essence of the wax is known through the intellect, Descartes must demonstrate that it is not known by the senses or the imagination. Hence, he must present arguments that 1) negate the senses and 2) negate the imagination. Negating Sense: Initially, the wax appears to have features such as colour, taste, smell, size, shape, and solidity.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes says that when he is in a dream he can feel the heat of a fire even though the fire is not there. That feeling of warmth seems real even though he is asleep. Descartes senses deceive him which makes him question if his senses are always deceptive. In Conclusion, Descartes argues that one cannot prove we exist or are part of a concrete world.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes work ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ is filled with his many ideas on God, the relationship between the mind and body and the trustworthiness of things we believe to be true. The main focus of this essay is his arguments for distrusting the senses. These are the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. Meditations begins with Descartes casting doubt on everything he once believed to be absolutely true. It is a search for absolute certainty.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the wax example, Descartes not only shows that perceiving object is considered a node of thinking, but also represent that we can understand an idea through a pure understanding, which is mind rather than sensory experience. The wax significantly suggests that pure understanding is clearer than sensory experience (Descartes, 1996, p20-p21). In the other hand. Locke emphasizes that we understand ideas through primarily using reason which comes from our sensory experience (Locke, 2008, p19). The difference between the two explanations about obtaining true knowledge leads me to think that sensory experiences can be mistaken and as the result, they may cause different people to develop different interpretation on the same idea.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    301). The fact that things can be conveyed to him in a state where they’re not actually real, goes to show that he can’t trust things that are conveyed to him in real life. Likewise in the evil deceiver argument, it suggest that he may be under the control of a malicious demon who has “employed all his energies in order to deceive me.” (p. 303). This argument alludes to that that whatever our senses experience is fake and that the information we receive is being fed to us; but if we can’t trust our sense than how can we trust knowledge of the external world.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays