Rene Descartes Philosophy

Superior Essays
Philosophy has come a long way since it began. Rene Descartes was the principal father of philosophy. He was the perfect representative for the new scientific spirit. He had strong beliefs that there was a God that existed and he wanted to prove everyone wrong with his axioms. Alongside of this axioms he also went ahead explained his arguments for universal doubt through his book of Meditations. There was many people that disagreed with his view and they argued it with science, but he still presented enough information to argue why something that is doubted is able to exist. I experienced a great upgrade and opportunity is education growing up. I believe it was an act from the all-knowing and all-powerful since there is not a scientific explanation …show more content…
Descartes described that human knowledge was like a tree; trunk was physics and roots were metaphysics. Descartes used three types of axioms to support his thoughts and beliefs. He claimed his axioms to be undoubtable. One of his axioms that was ethical was “I exist”, there was also the physical axiom coming from natural philosophy “I am thinking ‘things’”, and lastly the metaphysics axiom of “God exists.” Descartes said that people that don’t understand or belief in God, do not fully understand the concept of God. Along with his axioms, Descartes was really interested in math. He would look for truth in the inputs and the outputs that he was classifying as bad on both sides, he would look at them in a mathematical way. He stated that mathematics was a form of knowledge. Alongside of his axioms, he uses three very similar arguments to open our knowledge to doubt: the deceiving God argument, the evil demon argument, and the dream argument. Each one of these ideas represents that we never experience external object directly, but only through the matters of our own mind and the images that are created. Descartes introduces dreams, a deceiving God, and an evil demon as ways of motivating this doubt in the accuracy of our sense experience (Meditations). Descartes also has an explanation of deceitfulness for each of these ideas. For the God argument, he states, “We believe that there is an all-powerful God who has created us and who is all-powerful. Next, for the evil demon argument, Descartes claims that instead of assuming that God is the source of our deceptions, we will assume that there exists an evil demon that is capable of deceiving us in the same way God is able to do so. Then there is the dream argument, which Descartes claims that there are no definite signs to distinguish dream experience from waking experience, therefore, it is completely possible to dreaming is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes explores the nature of human perception through the mind as separated from the body. His meditations on the subject outline a number of principles regarding truth and understanding, but the Dream Argument for Skepticism is derived from a single principle. More specifically, Descartes explains that: "Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; and because some men err in reasoning, and fall into paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for demonstrations; and finally, when I considered that the very same…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes was a French philosopher who is considered today as the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. Descartes often fought with the idea of this thing called Skepticism, which is the philosophical position that knowledge is impossible. This did not sit well with Descartes so he decided to write a book called “The Meditations on First Philosophy” as a guide book to the truth. Descartes’ two main aims with this book were first, to address and defeat skepticism, and second, to attain perfect knowledge, which is knowledge that is absolutely certain and indubitable; he aimed to used this idea of perfect knowledge to defeat skepticism. One of the first things Descartes had to do in order to defeat skepticism was look at his own beliefs and doubt all…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Meditation 3”, Descartes introduces the reader to his ideas of God. He wants to know whether God is a deceiver, or better yet, if there is even a God to begin with. He muses with the idea that exploring God’s deceptive nature is necessary to his search for the truth. If there is a God, and he is a deceiver, then how could Descartes know anything with complete certainty? Using a deductive argument, Descartes explains that since God is perfect and has no imperfections, and deception is seen as an imperfection, therefore God cannot be a deceiver.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The simplest principles in dreams such as color and nature are not questioned, but the meditator must doubt the correlation between real life and a dream sequence. Through intellect and reason we decide what is true and what is false, according to Descartes, and the dream argument identifies this theory. The next argument he uses to influence his universal doubt is that of the deceiving God. Descartes states that most people believe in an almighty power, God, who created man and is the most powerful. Since God is the most powerful, he has the ability to deceive us in matters of mathematical knowledge that are the most basic to comprehend.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead he argues that there is a possibility for them to be false. Therefore, they are questionable. Along with the senses possibility of being deceptive, our sensory perceptions can be deceptive in a way that we could all be in a never ending dream. Descartes concluded that there is no way to distinguish between sensory perceptions in and out of a dream, it is possible for use to be in a dream twenty for seven. Lastly, Descartes beings into doubt our belief of a priori knowledge because he suggests that it could be the case that God is an evil genius that deceives us.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is a devout christian, but even he begins to wonder if he is being deceived by God. However, he quickly abandons this notion and says that because God is supremely good, Descartes knows that God would not purposefully deceive him. In order to obtain resolution in his thoughts, Descartes creates a scenario in which all of his past beliefs are false. He says to suppose that there is no supremely good God but instead an evil demon, who tries to deceive him all the time. Everything Descartes sees is not real, instead it is an elaborate illusion set forth by the evil demon.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes third meditation he attempts to make an argument for god, he does this by using the certain basis of knowledge he attained in the previous meditations as a starting point. The knowledge he attained previously was that he existed as a thinking thing. He declares that arithmetic and geometry were simple truths, two and three does equal five, but he also reminded himself that these “certain” truths could be deceptions. The problem with this truth was that as soon as he stopped thinking about them the doubt would return. He supposes that it could once again be the evil demon that is causing him to believe these “truths”.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emily Shrem PHIL 2101 Professor Slack November 1st, 2017 Assignment Two: Descartes Rene Descartes was a mathematician, a physicist and most importantly, a philosopher. He was one of the first to spread modern philosophy and did so by using accepted scientific knowledge. He is famous for his proposition, “cogito ergo sum”, which in English translates to “I think therefore I am.” In Descartes’ Meditation on First Philosophy, he takes on a few tasks to come to his ultimate conclusion.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The discussion on whether the idea of God is innate has been held among many philosophers. There are two philosophers, Rene Descartes and John Locke, who both have come up detailed explanation and understanding of the idea of God. Descartes believes that the idea of God is innate and inborn with a human mind. Yet Locke argues that the idea of God is not innate. Two philosophers’ opinions reach a disagreement.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays