Rene Descartes Meditation On First Philosophy

Improved Essays
Emily Shrem
PHIL 2101
Professor Slack
November 1st, 2017
Assignment Two: Descartes
Rene Descartes was a mathematician, a physicist and most importantly, a philosopher. He was one of the first to spread modern philosophy and did so by using accepted scientific knowledge. He is famous for his proposition, “cogito ergo sum”, which in English translates to “I think therefore I am.”
In Descartes’ Meditation on First Philosophy, he takes on a few tasks to come to his ultimate conclusion. He uses the Method of Doubt to get rid of all his preexisting ideas and beliefs that could be false. Then he has his beliefs that can no way be false and he discovers a type of knowledge. He proves that the mind is distinct from the body, proves the existence of
…show more content…
He depends on his sensory perceptions like touch, taste, sight, scent as well as sound. Descartes gets a piece of wax, fresh from a honey comb. He describes it in detail using his sensory perceptions, one by one. After explaining the wax, he goes on to melt it. Now all the qualities that were once familiar to us about that wax are completely gone. Something that one would recognize as wax once before was now turned into something entirely different. In order for one to know how to discover what that wax has become they have to understand that the wax could appear differently based on its physical state. The wax is not defined by the way it appears to human senses, but rather just the way it is presented to us. The wax is something changeable and flexible. One can not perceive all the possible ways a piece of wax can present itself …show more content…
Many people believe in things just because they were taught to believe in them. Few people actually question and step outside the box to actually understand things on their own. Even with mathematical equations. People accept them as true and do not doubt them. Descartes shows that just because one knows something as true does not necessarily mean it is. With the wax, one can not be certain what it is just based off its physical properties and the way it appears. One can not understand an object based off how it feels or looks. Descartes knew the nature of his own mind better because he knew one hundred percent that he existed in this universe in a specific time and place. One can never be sure of the objects and ideas that they are surrounded

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________ Reading Questions A Discourse on Method 1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes can demonstrate the validity of his arguments, specifically through the use of the wax example, and ultimately has a larger framework of philosophical reasoning underlying his position than that of Montaigne. Further, Montaigne’s argument is weakened by his initial assumption that all knowledge comes from the senses. Descartes, by finding that the senses can be trusted, defeats this assumption as well as Montaigne’s…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the same wax remains. Therefore, our awareness regarding the solid wax and the liquid wax being equivalent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the wax example, Descartes not only shows that perceiving object is considered a node of thinking, but also represent that we can understand an idea through a pure understanding, which is mind rather than sensory experience. The wax significantly suggests that pure understanding is clearer than sensory experience (Descartes, 1996, p20-p21). In the other hand. Locke emphasizes that we understand ideas through primarily using reason which comes from our sensory experience (Locke, 2008, p19). The difference between the two explanations about obtaining true knowledge leads me to think that sensory experiences can be mistaken and as the result, they may cause different people to develop different interpretation on the same idea.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It can also be cognizant of bodily things, such as seeing, hearing, and feeling. Although he can do all of these things, Descartes decides they are only true when he is awake, and false when he is asleep. Sensing and thinking are one and the same. He finds it odd that bodily things are more distinctly known than the “I”, even though he knows he exists. Descartes realizes what is happening, and lets his mind “wander” and doesn’t confine it to limits.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    René Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is often thought of the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. He is also recognized for his work in mathematics, and sciences, where he created a universal method of deductive reasoning. Although he is known for all of theses, his primary field of study was in Philosophy. His most famous quote is “I think, therefore I am” (first written in French “Je pense, donc je suis”).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Something which can be difficult to distinguish when reading the Meditations is whether Descartes is talking about truth in its purest sense or reality. In the second meditation, he argues that when looking to establish truth we need to accept that we exist otherwise we cannot judge the truth in anything else. But this can be confusing as he is relating truth and reality and equalling them to each other. If Descartes here, is referring to the idea of reality he is arguing that for us to judge the reality of anything else, we must admit that through our ability to think for ourselves and rationalise, we must be real. However, if he is referring to truth, then he is using the truth of our own thoughts to rationalise the truth of all else.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, upon a closer and more rigorous examination, it is revealed that this argument is not as unsubstantiated as it seems to be. In order to understand how Descartes justifies his assertion, the concept of “clear and distinct idea” needs to be understood. Descartes’ “clear and distinct idea” involves the argument that an idea becomes clear when sharp intellectual perception is applied to it, similar to how a physical object becomes visually clear when sharp visual perception is applied to the physical object. Furthermore, the idea is distinct if it is not only clear but also excludes all other ideas that does not belong to it (Skirry). Thus, Descartes argued that the body is distinct from the mind because, after applying acute intellectual perception, Descartes perceived that the idea of the mind excludes the idea of body and the idea of the body excludes the idea of the mind therefore the mind is separate and different from the body (Skirry).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That experience determines our idea of that particular thing. René Descartes was a Rationalist, which is someone who believes in…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays