Rene Descartes Argument Essay

Superior Essays
Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use …show more content…
During the first interaction between Prospero and Miranda in The Tempest, Prospero explains “I thus neglecting worldly ends, all dedicated to closeness, and the bettering of my mind with that which, but by being so retired, o 'er prized all popular rate, in my false brother awaked an evil nature” (The Tempest, p.9). The regretful tone of “ I thus neglecting worldly ends” points out that Prospero laments his decision to trust his brother; however, the strong word choice of “dedicated” emphasizes Prospero 's commitment to expanding his mind through contemplation and solitude. Similarly, Descartes endeavours to “free his mind of all cares [...]” by “withdrawing into solitude” and beginning the “demolition of [his] opinions” (Meditations on First Philosophy, p.59). The aggressive tone of “demolition of [his] opinions” illustrates Descartes’ desire to start from scratch and rebuild his knowledge. Moreover, its is important to note that Descartes is using “opinions” as a general term when referring to all of his previously held beliefs, including all the knowledge he gained through educational and personal experience. Both authors emphasize the effectiveness of solitude and gaining knowledge, whether it comes from building upon what you know or completely starting anew. Unfortunately, …show more content…
After being deceived by his brother and cast away to an island, Prospero was able to apply his knowledge and gain experience. Caliban urges his comrades to “ first possess his books; for without he’s but a sot, as I am, nor hath not one spirit to command” (The Tempest, p.53). The strict tone of “first possess his books” exemplifies how Prospero gains the knowledge of magic from his books, but only when he applies his knowledge is he able to command spirits and pose a threat to Caliban. When Miranda and Ferdinand see each other for the first time they instantly fall in love and Prospero reveals, “It goes on, I see, as my soul prompts it” (The Tempest, p.23). The pronoun usage in “my soul prompts it” indicates that Prospero is the one manipulating the couple’s emotions. In addition, Shakespeare’s use of magic in the play suggests that, because Prospero used what he learned from contemplation and gained experience, he now has the ability to be the manipulator rather than be manipulated. The irony of Miranda’s exclamation “O brave new world!” (The Tempest, p.78) further illustrates Shakespeare’s belief that experience is the only way to deal with doubt, which Miranda lacks due to her estrangement from the outside world. Miranda’s lack of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes uses a structural method of dissecting and questioning knowledge to establish truth amongst provided information. The introspection into his method begins in part one, when he sets the mental foundation for the proper understanding of real world elements and emphasizes how unreliable reasoning and perspective can be. In part two Descartes, uses personal experiences to demonstrate real world applications of his own method. Lastly, Descartes remains true to his method of reasoning , strengthening it by introducing counter arguments.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘Clearly and Distinctly’ rule is the view that ‘everything that I perceive very clearly and distinctly is true.’ However, we must first begin by defining these key terms. By ‘clearly’ Descartes describes it as ‘present and accessible to the attentive mind’ and ‘distinctly’ is ‘so sharply separated from all other perceptions that it contains within itself only what is clear.’ In this essay, I will closely analyse how Descartes arrived to this rule of perception and will argue that he was not incredibly successful in using it to rebuild all knowledge.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Meditations one and two, Descartes makes many arguments about many different topics within the area of philosophy. However one of the more important ones is the idea of “cognito”. This term basically means consciousness or mind when used in the context of Descartes’ Meditations. Furthermore, through his meditations, he seeks to create assurance that it is certain. He does this by making three main points to support his argument.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes reflects on many false statements he has come to believe while growing up and the various arguments he has developed from this falsehood. He resolves to clean up his mind from the story and decides to begin afresh from scratch and to build again his knowledge based on a particular ground. Sitting by the fire all by himself, he revokes his earlier opinion carefully, free from any burdens and worries. Descartes thinks that he needs only to find a reason for doubting his currently held beliefs so as motivate him to find a sound foundation for his knowledge. Instead of challenging every idea he individually holds, he decides it might land them all into doubt if he challenges his opinion basis and the underlying assumptions and principles in which the views…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Argument

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the mediations, Descartes is searching for new opinions because he discovered that his former beliefs were false. He realized this by understanding that his original fundamental ideology was incorrect. Therefore, Descartes decide to raze his old beliefs from the foundations if he wants to discover anything scientific. Since Descartes needs to prove all of his opinions false, if he finds a reason to doubt his opinions, he will. He does this since it is impossible to questions every single opinion.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is evident that Miranda has more respect for her father than he seems to have for his daughter. Prospero is talking to his daughter about the time that he was the Duke of Milan, and how he…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The play, The Tempest is one of the many texts which allegorically represents various aspects of colonial oppression. The Tempest resonates with unusual power and variety. Prospero’s supreme control over the island and over the spirits of the island symbolizes his imperialistic nature within the play. Shakespeare presents the issue of imperialism through the character, Prospero as he has dominant power and control over the island and the original inhabitants. Parteni defines imperialism as “the process whereby the dominant political-economic interest of one nation controls other peoples’ land and goods for their own enrichment” (2005) and this can be seen in the tempest as Prospero uses his language and power to imperialize the original inhabitants…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays