Analysis Of Descartes's Inception

Improved Essays
A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked. In the movie Inception we see the main character Cobb in a twisted world which continues to bring him upon doubt. He begins to not know the difference between his own true reality and his false one. Cobb uses dreams to capture hidden secrets of his target by entering their subconscious. Those in his life including his beloved …show more content…
This infers to the belief that he may be being tricked by something wicked. If something seems so ordinary such a square with four sides how could we know it was true. For example in the matrix everything that is seen seems to be so ordinary but leads to the understanding that everything is unreal. In Inception you see Cobb leaving within this “matrix” within the false reality he creates. Everything is ordinary and makes perfect sense that it is a replica to the real world. This reality mimics the real world and will manifests real people, feelings, and places. It would be almost uncertain to think that it was not of the real thing. Cobb becomes tormented by falling in between the small crack within reality and unreality. Descartes ends this mediation by saying “Perhaps nothing is certain” (Descartes 347) tying in to the exact feelings of Cobb with his overpowering uncertainty.
In conclusion, For Cobb’s he has chosen the world that has deceived him but knows that his mind and body exist and that is all that matters. For Descartes does not know that truth but knows that knowledge exists because he does exist. Descartes rationalism debate proves that all knowledge is rational. Cobb would have been able to know that he was in the fictitious world if he would have used his reason. This is because his senses are which that had been deceived. Both Descartes and Cobb’s come to the statement that the only thing that is certain and really matters is that “I am, I exist” (Descartes

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes’ statement, “I at least know for certain that nothing is certain” perfectly illustrates the multiple problems that arise when all rational beings realize that their senses can deceive them and that the very foundation of their knowledge is based on the assumption that everything they encounter is real. Thankfully, being aware of the problem is the first step in solving it. The juxtaposition of Rene Descartes and William Shakespeare reveals a difference of opinion when they set out to examine and solve the problems that arise from the doubtfulness of the knowledge provided by our senses. Although both authors agree on the importance of solitude and the potential problem of an evil genius manipulating our senses, Descartes’ use…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Rene Descartes text on Meditations on First Philosophy, he states that he has found himself going back on matters that he thought he believed to be true, and is now deciding to rebuild his knowledge from the ground up, and accepting as true only those claims which are absolutely certain. All he had previously thought he knew came to him through the senses. Through a process of methodological doubt, he no longer agrees with the process of declaring truth and knowledge through senses. At any moment he could be dreaming, or his senses could be deceived either by God or by some evil demon, so he concludes that he cannot trust his senses about anything. Although, he does realize that despite the possibility of being deceived, he knows not to…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Doubt is a key concept when it comes to Skepticism and even more so when it comes to Descartes’ Evil Genius. The concept is simple, there is an evil genius who takes everything in your life and replaces it with something that is not real. As a result, your surroundings are no longer real. This is where Descartes begins, by knowing that the evil genius has…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Skepticism

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes doubts everything that is suspicious and unclear to find the truth. Frequently doubting things may create the impression that his tactics are truly skeptical; however, Descartes is far from being a skeptic – he has a positive aim. He hopes to not deny all of our opinions on things we think we know, but to reach the state of unquestionable knowledge. By denying everything, his aim is not to prove that everything is false but to find a real answer behind things that has no doubt. However, he realizes that if he cannot prove anything beyond any doubt, he can easily disprove everything based on the doubt.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What if everything we believe to be true, is really false? What if we are living an illusion? Descartes began to doubt everything in his life because he wanted to discover what truths would be stable when he completely cleared his mind of everything that he had been…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believed that if a demon would try to deceive you into thinking that it exists and you do not, you would have to exist in order for the demon to be able to deceive you. This is where the phrase comes from, if you are a thought creating human being, then you exist in the world. This is thought to be Descartes first principal. Descartes states that there is God as he describes him as “true God, in whom all the treasures of wisdom and the sciences lie hid” (AT VII 53; CSM II 37). Descartes ascertains that God is an all powerful being that created us by stating that if no one is perfect then we are created from the hand of an all powerful perfect creature that placed you on the earth for a reason.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the following essay, one wishes to discuss why there can never be any justification for a belief in Other Minds. Descartes offers up “I think therefore I am” in First Meditations on Philosophy (Descartes, 1641), which has it’s fair share of problems but one wishes to use this quote to illustrate that while Descartes only proved that ‘I’ exist within one 's own mind, there is nothing to say that this must extend to others too. Or even to anyone but Descartes and Myself. And while that may seem an irrational claim, one shall go on to justify why this claim may hold as much rationality as its negation.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stroud believes that there is an argument in which no one can ever really know anything about the external world. Stroud examines how Descartes upon reflecting on his senses, was unable to rule out the possibility of dreaming which leads him to conclude that he has no knowledge of the world around him. Stroud then argues how Descartes couldn’t distinguish reality from the concept of dreaming, and since he believed one couldn’t know things on account of their dreams, then in simpler words he wouldn’t know anything. He basically states how he knows about the external world only if he knows that he is not dreaming, but he cannot know that he is dreaming at the moment, therefore he cannot know anything about the external world. So in order to know anything about the world around us we must then know for a fact that we are not…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays