Descartes 'The Pseudo-Problem Of Skepticism'

Improved Essays
In the passage from Descartes’ Meditation, the conclusion is that Descartes now has reason to doubt all of his beliefs including those of his senses. The premises seem to be: (1) If an omnibenevolent god wouldn’t deceive us then there must be an evil demon doing so. (2) If an evil demon is our source of deception then one cannot know true beliefs. In the passage from Sweetman’s “The Pseudo-Problem of Skepticism” the conclusion is that we should not take the problem of skepticism seriously because we have no reasons to do so. The premises seem to be: (1) We know that it is not possible to be a brain in a vat. (2) If we know that it is not possible, then we have no good reason to believe that we are just brains in vats. In the passage from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    2. The problem with Cartesian skepticism is that there is not enough evidence to prove that the world around us is always false. Descartes is trying to prove his point off of logic instead of actual evidence. Descartes is putting too much faith on the mind over the physical world. When he explains an evil being manipulating our thoughts and senses he still cannot prove that the evil being actually exists.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Approaching the conflictions regarding the controversial skeptical argument of the Brain in A Vat there can be many flaws or holes seen within the argument itself, Moore’s Proof, the Anti-Skeptical argument, and Modus Ponens. Throughout all of these examples many flaws or counter examples arise that can either help or reject the argument by themselves, but when using all together you get a better stance on the argument. Upon closer examination of premise one, I know that I have hands only if I know I am not a brain in a vat, this statement could be false itself because what if even if I was in a “Vat” I wasn’t just a brain but an entire body, seen within the movie The Matrix. Either way I personally don’t believe there has been an evidence to either disbelieve or believe this theory.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Luberda PHIL 1100 04 December 12th Throughout the course of this paper, the topic of skepticism will be discussed in multiple ways. First skepticism will be introduced in John Pollock’s short article A Brain in a Vat. Then the difference between ordinary incredulity and general philosophical skepticism will be discussed. Finally, the various general philosophical skepticism will be analyzed and opinions of arguments will be discussed.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believed that all we can know is information that we are certain of. Knowledge with any amount of skepticism, according to Descartes, proves to be unreliable and thus, not real knowledge. Therefore, he further stated that the knowledge obtained through the senses is not real knowledge because the senses can be deceiving and biased to individuals. Descartes even is skeptical of concepts such as math because he believed that one is just told that two plus three is five, but one cannot be certain. According to Descartes, an "evil genius of the utmost power and cunning has employed all his energies in order to deceive me."…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the worldview of the skeptic, if there is a skeptical hypothesis for something, then that certain thing could not be known. If I were to hold the belief that the grass is green, a skeptic would say, “well, how do you know that grass is actually there? It could be a projection of your imagination. How can I be certain that how you see green is the same way I see green?” The skeptic’s insistence upon certainty in knowledge is challenged for except the knowledge that you yourself exists.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first being that you cannot trust authorities as they disagree amongst themselves and have differing theories and ideas and therefore they cannot be passing on certain truths as they would agree if that was the case. The mistrust of the senses is the basis of what will become Descartes’ dreaming argument, this is the idea that you cannot at any time trust your senses as they deceive us regularly in the form of things that are far away or too close being easily misinterpreted (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau, 2015). From this Descartes introduces his dreaming argument.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    301). The fact that things can be conveyed to him in a state where they’re not actually real, goes to show that he can’t trust things that are conveyed to him in real life. Likewise in the evil deceiver argument, it suggest that he may be under the control of a malicious demon who has “employed all his energies in order to deceive me.” (p. 303). This argument alludes to that that whatever our senses experience is fake and that the information we receive is being fed to us; but if we can’t trust our sense than how can we trust knowledge of the external world.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    René Descartes was a French philosopher born in 1596. He is often thought of the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. He is also recognized for his work in mathematics, and sciences, where he created a universal method of deductive reasoning. Although he is known for all of theses, his primary field of study was in Philosophy. His most famous quote is “I think, therefore I am” (first written in French “Je pense, donc je suis”).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    truths regarding math etc. that did not require sensory experience could be attained by reason alone; other knowledge however, which required experience of the world alongside reason was doubtful. This knowledge could not be regarded as absolute as it required experiences which could not be trusted to be accurate. He added to this assertion by arguing that although dreams appear as real as waking experiences, these dreams cannot provide persons with knowledge, they can only draw from conscious sensory experiences. Also, since knowledge consciously derived from the senses can be the cause of illusions, then sense experience itself can be doubtable.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays