Hum/202 Week 2 Reading Question Paper

Decent Essays
IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________
Reading Questions
A Discourse on Method

1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?

Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.
…show more content…
According to Descartes, when it comes to forming opinions people tend to take one of two extreme approaches. What are these "two classes of minds"?

It is referred to as “Cartesian dualism”, which describes Descartes belief that the mind and matter is distinct. According to him, there is a system of oppositions between the metaphysical soul and the physical body. That means, although the mind and the material body is separable substances, they interact with each

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To conclude, the argument of Descartes based on the indivisibility of the mind is not factually valid even though it has been well-known in supported for a long time in the past. Nowadays, the improvement of modern technology can simply prove his argument wrong. However, nobody can be judgmental about the validity of his argument because he is a knowledgeable philosopher at his own time. Any contribution to philosophy should be taken with seriousness and…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes championed the notion of working from doubt, and this superficially seems very similar to the scientific process of disproving an hypothesis. But if Descartes had truly wanted to answer the question of viable external objectivity, he ought to have started from the notion of the objective world and worked in toward the subjective understanding. In order to demonstrate what I mean by this, let’s take an example from modern artificial intelligence…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, dualist theorists, such as Plato and Descartes, hold that man is composed of two utterly distinct substances. In dualism, the mind and the body are not only different but they exist separately of each other. They are “as different and distinct as the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Argument

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the mediations, Descartes is searching for new opinions because he discovered that his former beliefs were false. He realized this by understanding that his original fundamental ideology was incorrect. Therefore, Descartes decide to raze his old beliefs from the foundations if he wants to discover anything scientific. Since Descartes needs to prove all of his opinions false, if he finds a reason to doubt his opinions, he will. He does this since it is impossible to questions every single opinion.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “Discourse on Method,” Descartes argues that the reason our conclusions vary in knowledge is that we do not have a systematic or methodical way of thinking. Therefore, in his essay he tries to provide such a method which could conduct our minds to achieve a complete and certain truth. Though, I wonder, how could one single person be able to come up with a method that could be used by everyone, and function for everyone in the same way. though Descartes was an intelligent philosopher, he could not have been able to concoct a method for everyone’s way of learning. Descartes’ argues that the way we think can vary depending on many reasons.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes And Doubt

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1- The Procedure of doubting ones own beliefs to discover which beliefs is essentially true. Descartes who engages a basic approach, which aims to defeat doubt at its own ground. He supports doubting the basic route of thinking in addition to doubting the proof of the senses and traditional delusions. If any exact fact can pass this test, it is actually certain and can be measured a solid basis of knowledge. Doubt is faced in our everyday life through the doubt a person face if god really created the world or in mathematical problems, because we always see men fail which leads us to doubt.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, we as the students were given the following instructions: “Discuss in a philosophical-critical manner the significance of Descartes' approach to knowledge (epistemology) as one of the main historical starting points of the Modern world view” To contradict the various segments of this assignment, the following points will have to be made prominent and then discussed as a whole: - Discussing Descartes approach to knowledge or better known as epistemology. - How this approach contributed to the historical starting point of the modern world view. Descartes approach to knowledge or better known as epistemology Firstly, René Descartes (1596-1650) is regarded around the world as the father/mentor of modern day philosophy. His immense…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The reason Descartes partakes in this act of radical doubt is to see which of his beliefs remain certain, for as we all know no theory is…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays