Reign Of Terror Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
During the French Revolution, revolutionaries wanted to create a government that would value people’s rights. Unfortunately, violence started to play a role in order to achieve the goals of the revolution. The period in which the violence started became known as the Reign of Terror. Individual rights were being ignored and thousands of people were being executed because they were suspected of aiding or being an enemy. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.
The external threat of foreign armies in France does not justify the actions that were taken during the Reign of Terror. In Document B it shows a timeline of events that occurred during the Reign of
…show more content…
In Document F it shows a picture of what it would look like if a person is being guillotined in a town. That person would be publically humiliated for what he has done or what he is accused of doing and then he would be killed. The only thing this can accomplish in a town is that the people would be living in fear since they don’t want to be falsely accused and that they would be living in a fake peace. There is no justification in these types of actions because they would only lead to fear and conflict. In Document G it says “We must smother the internal and external enemies of the Republic or perish.” This is basically saying that everyone that is in the Republic must die or that France and its revolution will perish. To think of killing all your enemies is pretty extreme since you are not able to find a solution through peaceful ideas. There are many other things you can do if someone is a threat to you, such as making an agreement instead of killing thousands of people. The actions and ideas that came up during the Reign of Terror were too extreme and not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This argues that the Reign of Terror was necessary to rescue France from invasion. The Austrians invaded because Queen Marie Antoinette was killed because she was convicted by the Revolutionary Tribunal of high treason, and executed by guillotine on the Place de la Révolution on October 16, 1793. Queen Marie Antoinette was also the daughter of Leopold II, who was the king of Austria. There is no doubt the Reign of terror had many negative impacts on society, however it was essential for France’s survival.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was not justified in many ways, simply because the internal threats were never all that harmful, the external threats were very weak, and the extreme methods were used in a time of need and with unnecessary physical force. It was not justified because there is absolutely no reason to kill 20,000-40,000 with the guillotine. He killed a thousand people and took away their rights. This was Robespierre’s way of trying to make peace. “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible,” said Maximilien Robespierre.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This part in the French Revolution will eventually end with the person who started it, Maximilien Robespierre. Although the Reign of Terror had brutal violence, it was justified because of the resistance of the revolution in France, the foreign threats and to protect the public safety inside of France. The Reign of Terror was needed to because of the heavy revolution resistance in France. A map shows the areas of deepest resistance to the revolution in multiple cities in France. The map illustrates that many cities in…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When this occurs, the lack of power and control opens a window of time in which the citizens of Europe could fight for what they want. Thus causing the Reign of Terror. Mass amounts of death occurred, leaving every man to fight for themselves. The Reign of Terror was justified in sense that it…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The great social theorist and philosopher, Isaiah Berlin once stated, “Injustice, poverty, slavery, ignorance - these may be cured by reform or revolution. But men do not live only by fighting evils. They live by positive goals, individual and collective, a vast variety of them, seldom predictable, at times incompatible.” In simpler terms, Berlin is saying that to cure injustice and poverty, men may use revolution and reform but they cannot “live only by fighting evils”, they must also live by positive goals that protect society’s interests as a whole and not become guided by their own ignorance. And it is for these reasons that Maximilien Robespierre’s Reign of Terror was not justified.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the apparent need for the revolution, there is no reason that such a horrid event like the Reign of Terror was justified. The Reign of Terror was not justified because it caused more foreign hostility, it involved an abysmal manner of determining who was executed or not and it caused damage within the country itself. Firstly, the Reign of Terror caused hatred towards France among foreign countries. Austria and Prussia did not want the Terror to spread to their countries so they decided to preemptively take action.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Charles Dickens once said, “Liberty, equality, fraternity, or death; - the last, much the easiest to bestow, O Guillotine!” The French Revolution has been seen as a war that caused death, pain, and prosperity. Many primary documents, like Simon Schama Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution, have mentioned that the amount of human lives lost during the French Revolution was unnecessary. The amount of deaths in the revolution explains the outcome of how much violence took place. Was the French Revolution worth its human costs?…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror is not justified because of three major reasons: threats did not require the Reign of Terror, the methods were too extreme, and the Reign of Terror did not support the ideals…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the execution of King Louis XVI, the national assembly appointed a 12 man Committee of Public Safety to run France. Maximilien Robespierre, a great orator dominated the committee and led the army to protect the nations borders. To defend from internal enemies, he enacted the Reign of Terror. During the year 1973-1974, anyone suspected of aiding the enemy was swiftly put on trial and sent to the guillotine. Terror became the order of the day, as Robespierre stated, “Softness to traitors will destroy us all.”…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideals of the government were natural rights and to protect the people. However, the Reign of Terror did not complete that. Instead, it went against people’s rights. Written by Steven Otfinoski, “Watch committees were set up in every neighborhood to ferret out and expel foreigners” (Doc E). This killed many people and threatened the right of equality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some were counterrevolutionaires, against the new government, some were pro-revolution, for the new government. The two sides did not get along so the government turned to Terror. With the new invention of the Guillotine, and the power of Robespierre, the man behind the Reign of Terror, this time became brutal and violent. Although the counterrevolutionaries were becoming slightly out of control, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it violated the inalienable rights of citizens, the methods of execution were too extreme, and France was already stronger than all of its internal and external threats.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in article A, the "Declaration of the Rights of Man" was made for "the preservation of the natural ... rights of man. These are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. " While this seems logical, The Reign of Terror took these rights away from every citizen of France. Every citizen was subjected to having these rights, and taking them away is absurd.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity ,” is a quote by Robespierre during his time in power within the Committee of General Security. Robespierre believed it was upon the population to act on the means of attainment of reign of the constitutional laws. His speech explores the influence of society upon the fundamental principle of the democratic or popular government. The failure by the population was not seen favourable by Robespierre and resulted in the adoption of the Committee of General Security managing the internal policy of the country. “…But when the people itself is corrupted, liberty is already lost,” reflects the attitude of the people within the context of the Industrial Revolution, when Terror was lawfully inaugurated as a policy on September 5th, 1793.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays