Reign Of Terror Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
During the French Revolution, revolutionaries wanted to create a government that would value people’s rights. Unfortunately, violence started to play a role in order to achieve the goals of the revolution. The period in which the violence started became known as the Reign of Terror. Individual rights were being ignored and thousands of people were being executed because they were suspected of aiding or being an enemy. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.
The external threat of foreign armies in France does not justify the actions that were taken during the Reign of Terror. In Document B it shows a timeline of events that occurred during the Reign of
…show more content…
In Document F it shows a picture of what it would look like if a person is being guillotined in a town. That person would be publically humiliated for what he has done or what he is accused of doing and then he would be killed. The only thing this can accomplish in a town is that the people would be living in fear since they don’t want to be falsely accused and that they would be living in a fake peace. There is no justification in these types of actions because they would only lead to fear and conflict. In Document G it says “We must smother the internal and external enemies of the Republic or perish.” This is basically saying that everyone that is in the Republic must die or that France and its revolution will perish. To think of killing all your enemies is pretty extreme since you are not able to find a solution through peaceful ideas. There are many other things you can do if someone is a threat to you, such as making an agreement instead of killing thousands of people. The actions and ideas that came up during the Reign of Terror were too extreme and not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Between 1793 and 1794 Rospierre and the committee of public safety murdered 20,000 to 40,000 people. This time period is called the Reign of terror. With the number of casualties being so high it leads many to wonder if the Reign of Terror was necessary. The conditions in France were not severe enough to require such a violent response from the French government. The conditions were not serious for three reasons: International problems, corruption in the government, and the treatment of counterrevolutionaries.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tyranny (cruel and oppressive government or rule) is viewed in many different ways. In 1787 the founding father met in Philadelphia to discuss problems about the nation. They discussed the article of confederation but after a long debate it didn’t work out, the article of confederation had to go. They came to an agreement that they should make a new “Article of Confederation,” so they made another paper called The Constitution. They said that the new article (The Constitution) will start a new kind of government.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was one of the most brutal events of the French Revolution, killing over 35,000 people, including two rulers. The Reign of Terror was an 18 month period where Maximillien Robespierre led the government to execute all who did not support the revolution. These enemies were located both inside and outside the country of France. Some documents support the Reign of Terror, but it can also be argued that it was unfair and unjustified. After reading several documents, I feel the government’s campaign to execute thousands of innocent citizens was not justified for multiple reasons.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A time during the French Revolution, there came the Reign of terror, a one year period that saw countless scores of innocent citizens being guillotined. What exactly made a country that was running successful war crusades abroad degenerate into social terror, mass incarceration, and blatant executions unprecedented before? The economy was destitute, and the taxes were inflated. The poor do not have much liking for the rich, and in the French case, where the nobility was oppressive, an insurrection was therefore inevitable (Hunt, 33).…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some were counterrevolutionaires, against the new government, some were pro-revolution, for the new government. The two sides did not get along so the government turned to Terror. With the new invention of the Guillotine, and the power of Robespierre, the man behind the Reign of Terror, this time became brutal and violent. Although the counterrevolutionaries were becoming slightly out of control, the Reign of Terror was not justified because it violated the inalienable rights of citizens, the methods of execution were too extreme, and France was already stronger than all of its internal and external threats.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons towards why the Reign of Terror was not reasonable was that the people were living in fear of being executed, so they did what they could to not have their life come to such a fate. People blamed others of breaking the law so they were not suspected by the government. In document D, “Already several of these bandits have been arrested,” people who have been speaking their beliefs, or standing up for what they feel is right is resulting in them being treated like criminals. The “Committee of…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideals of the government were natural rights and to protect the people. However, the Reign of Terror did not complete that. Instead, it went against people’s rights. Written by Steven Otfinoski, “Watch committees were set up in every neighborhood to ferret out and expel foreigners” (Doc E). This killed many people and threatened the right of equality.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in article A, the "Declaration of the Rights of Man" was made for "the preservation of the natural ... rights of man. These are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. " While this seems logical, The Reign of Terror took these rights away from every citizen of France. Every citizen was subjected to having these rights, and taking them away is absurd.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    One comparable result of these revolutions were the execution programs that emerged from them. In France, a program called the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilen Robespierre, had started. The purpose of this program was to institute a policy of fear or terror in those who dared to counter revolt. Although this began as a period of trials against those who seemed to oppose the revolution, it quickly altered into morbid confrontations where those accused were not allowed to defend themselves. Many were killed through the use of guillotine, an execution method of beheading.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This part in the French Revolution will eventually end with the person who started it, Maximilien Robespierre. Although the Reign of Terror had brutal violence, it was justified because of the resistance of the revolution in France, the foreign threats and to protect the public safety inside of France. The Reign of Terror was needed to because of the heavy revolution resistance in France. A map shows the areas of deepest resistance to the revolution in multiple cities in France. The map illustrates that many cities in…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was the killing of hundreds of people who were suspected of committing treason and fighting for Prussia/Austria. Individuals argued if this was justified or in other words if they had a necessary reason to kill. The truth is that the Revolutionaries were justified to many reasons to murder innocent people over a political stand off. Firstly, the government had the mindset of keeping people safe and they were succeeding.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Charles Dickens once said, “Liberty, equality, fraternity, or death; - the last, much the easiest to bestow, O Guillotine!” The French Revolution has been seen as a war that caused death, pain, and prosperity. Many primary documents, like Simon Schama Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution, have mentioned that the amount of human lives lost during the French Revolution was unnecessary. The amount of deaths in the revolution explains the outcome of how much violence took place. Was the French Revolution worth its human costs?…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays