Reign Of Terror Justified Essay

Improved Essays
The Time of Misery The Reign of Terror was a crucial time during the French Revolution that negatively affected the lives of many. This horrifying period during the French Revolution all began in the year 1792 when former King Louis XVI was executed for treason. The following year, Maximilien Robespierre took control of France through the Committee of Public Safety. From that point on, the country of France went into a time of mourning and brought great suffering among millions. Was the Reign of Terror, a time of depression and tremendous agony, a reasonable act? In the eyes of many, it was not reasonable due to all the effects it brought among the country of France. Therefore it is clear that the Reign of Terror was not justified, because …show more content…
As stated in article A, the "Declaration of the Rights of Man" was made for "the preservation of the natural ... rights of man. These are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression." While this seems logical, The Reign of Terror took these rights away from every citizen of France. Every citizen was subjected to having these rights, and taking them away is absurd. In fact, many were executed for rejecting Maximilian’s ideals. Further, it is written in Article E that, “On April 6, 1793, [the revolutionary government established] the Committee of Public Safety…. The purpose was to “protect the public safety” from enemies both inside and outside of France. The Committee soon employed a shadowy network of informers and spies to achieve these ends.” In fact, anyone who spoke negatively about the government was executed. This lead to the deaths of up to about 40,000 people, provoked by “ruthless commissions.” As a matter of fact, the guillotine was an inhumane device used by the government that took the lives of thousands of people considered guilty. Article F reads, “The guillotine was regarded as a humane way to execute criminals. It had a sharp, angled blade, which dropped quickly on a guided track.” Although the government considered it humane, a public execution involving a disturbing view of a head being sliced off is not humane. The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Did France benefit from Louis XVI execution, or was it just a recipe for disaster? I would argue the effect of Louis XVI, who was the king of France from 1774-1793, ended catastrophically and lead to the downfall of France. Even though one can argue Louis XVI was a traitor to his country, his execution only lead to corruption. The people were lost without a king to follow, and those who were not, were far too radical to lead an entire country successfully. Almost immediately after Louis XVI execution, groups were formed and the country fell into wrong hands several times, leading to disastrous events.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because of the backlash against this law and the counterrevolution in the Vendée region of France, the government began to create harsher punishments for what they considered to be treason. As many as 40,000 people were killed during the Reign of Terror, including the king, Louis XVI, and his wife, Marie Antoinette. However, most of the victims of the Reign of Terror were peasants, the very people the French Revolution was intended to help. The picture…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They further limit these rights in Document E, by taking away the idea of suspicion. They denied lawyers, and were basically allowed to kill people just to kill them. They used the guillotine to carry out the execution. The guillotine itself was an enlightened killing method, able to kill everyone in the same way. By using this machine, they killed 35,000 - 40,000 people they may or may not be suspected of being traitors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people called the time that Robespierre was in charge the Reign of Terror. He created this to put fear into people that wanted to go against the new ideas. He executed people that were considered the “enemies of the Revolution.” In the year of 1793 and 1794, between 25 thousand and 50 thousand people were executed by the men of Robespierre. The people that were on Robespierre’s side were called the Jacobins. A Jacobin is the pro-revolution people of France.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Essay

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The French Revolution’s ‘Reign of Terror’ was unjustified in both the context in which it was created and in retrospect. The reign of terror was used by Maximilien Robespierre to consolidate his own power and influence in the country and provided no productive solutions to many major underlying socio-economic issues. It also led to the ultimate downfall of everything the French Revolution stood for as a result of the thousands of wrongful public executions and convictions. Maximilien Robespierre used his power within the ‘Committee of Public Safety’ to exercise control over the French Government and consolidate his influence and power among the country and people. Not only to the committee legislate mass conscription but they also passed…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First there was the loss of people, around seventeen thousand people were sentenced to death by guillotine. Some killed were people in high power such as the king and his wife Marie, Danton and Maximillian Robespierre. Another effect on the citizens of France was the destruction of their property, several hotels and prisons were destroyed. More importantly, many castles, homes and large mansions were attacked. Even through the Terror ended, it still caused a war between France and its surrounding nations.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In source two, Colin Jones states that ‘the progress of the war contributed to the sense of crisis’ which shows that the war had a significant impact on the lives of people in France in 1792. There was tension growing in Paris with the arrival of the fédérés who came from the provinces. They were militant revolutionaries and republicans whose officers were conservative or royalist. Despite their numbers never reaching above 5000 they were powerful and called for the removal of the king. This shows that war explained the downfall of the monarchy in 1792 because the fédérés were a powerful pressure group who called for the downfall of the monarchy which means more people were likely to come to the conclusion that the monarchy needed to come to an end.…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This event is considered the starting point to Riel’s dark journey consisting of rebellions, bloodshed, and murder. Louis Riel led the nation in two negative and shameful uprisings during his lifetime, responsible of being the leaders of both. The first was the Red River Rebellion. Louis Riel and his fellow Métis took over Fort Garry and captured many groups of English-speaking Ontario settlers who opposed the rebel government. They were imprisoned in the fort, under Riel’s orders.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A new Constitution was written and progressive enlightened forums were being written as well. The government was overthrown in the year of 1792. The king was still in prison and wars with Austria and Russia didn’t help either because they cost so much. Thus, the French started executions out of desperate measures and this became known as the French Reign of Terror. To make matters worse the Legislative Assembly was overthrown in August of 1792 and the National Convection came into play replacing the government.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Republic Downfall

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In fact they only seemed to add to the growing problems the Republic could not keep hidden from the populace. This was especially prominent during Sulla’s reign as he used bloodshed as his means of gaining control over Rome and installing fear in the senate. He easily did this when he “he published lists of individuals who were thus automatically condemned to death without trail,” (116.) This mass killing of people who Sulla felt threatened his complete rule over Rome was a step toward losing any strings that connected Rome to a Republic and not a monarchy, which the Rome’s loathed more than anything else. This mass killing in the public eye also exposed the populace to public executions.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays