What Was The Significance Of The Reign Of Terror

Improved Essays
The Reign of Terror was a continuation of the revolution that began in 1789. Although the Terror was an extreme set of laws, they were the only permanent rules that existed among the chaos. Even though they were vague laws, people accepted the terror because it helped to combat their feelings of alienation and paranoia in regards to all aspects of the revolution. While other historians discuss the significance of the foreign and civil wars in relation to the Terror, as a whole, the food shortages, the politics of the time, and general paranoia about tyrants and traitors allowed the Terror to spread. Part of the reason why the terror began was due to the widespread food shortages in France. Even though people were touting the idea of equality …show more content…
As hard as they tried, they still could not unite the whole population. Louis, for one, most definitely could not bring together the nation anymore. As Saint-Just noted, “What has Louis in common with the French people that they should treat him well after he betrayed them?” He also later said, “A people has only one dangerous enemy, and that is its government.” With the people’s trust towards the government at a low point, Robespierre was able to come in and assure the population of the government’s democratic intentions. Throughout the Terror, Robespierre emphasized punishing tyrants in order to strengthen the nation. In 1792 he said, “It is not thirst for a vengeance unworthy of the nation; it is the need to strengthen public liberty and tranquillity [sic] through the punishment of a tyrant.” Robespierre continued with that theme and in 1794 said, “All those who interpose their parricidal gentleness to protect the wicked from the avenging blade of national justice are like those who would throw themselves between the tyrants’ henchmen and our soldiers’ bayonets.” Under his rule, Robespierre continually tried to unite the country behind the singular cause of overthrowing tyrants. Unfortunately for him, the ineffectiveness of this attempt manifests itself in the people’s paranoia. There was no clear definition of what a tyrant was, so no one felt secure in …show more content…
He wrote that the Terror “was a massive repression organized from above on orders of the Convention with the intention of destroying not only the rebels but the population, farms, crops, villages, and anything else that had served the ‘brigands’ as shelter.” To him, the war was the key factor that led to the establishment of the Terror, and that the circumstances and the people’s desires were not as important in allowing Robespierre to come to power. Furet argued that the Terror was not “an instrument for ending a war; it followed and actually prolonged rather than shortened the war.” The people’s voices and the political attitudes of the time actually did play a bigger role in the Terror than Furet accounted for. As more people felt the Terror directly affecting their own families and personal lives, many of them turned to supporting the terror and denouncing the people around them for their own safety. Starving to death motivated many of the lower class citizens to support the terror, even if the government did not seem to be on their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If you think it was unjustified then the terror should have never happened then. Then the people of France would still be starving to death and still suffering the debt the king left it in. Since the terror was established people got their own rights and the people didn’t have to suffer anymore. You live in a contrary were you have rights and opportunity. Using terror is just a strategy plan used by the French to form the new republic and keep the chance of rights alive.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is demonstrated by his violation of many ideals of the French Revolution. First, Napoléon crowned himself “consul for life,” which essentially made himself a dictator of France (Napoléon Presentation, Slide 11). This directly contradicts the democratic values of the French Revolution. Next, although Napoléon preached the values of the French Revolution, he didn’t actually implement these values. Napoléon kept a political prisoner, Moreau, who wrote to Napoléon, “You swore to establish a government, not depending upon the life of one individual, not tyrannical but firm, stable and liberal; bestowing freedom on Frenchmen, and worthy to obtain by gratitude from foreign nations, that confidence and esteem, which your predecessors and yourself have commanded by the dread of your bayonets.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prosecution of Maximilien Robespierre Maximilien Robespierre did not justifiably utilize terror during the French revolution because he manipulated Enlightenment beliefs to validate his personal timetable. As a result of his frequent use of the death penalty, people’s “virtue” or love for the government became a way for Robespierre to create a fascist nation, not a democracy. The major goal of the Enlightenment oriented revolutionaries was to create a democracy through the participation of the population, but Robespierre’s use of terror in issuing frequent death penalties favored a radical group and forced other groups to participate in his pseudo democracy. Robespierre’s interpretation of virtue as “nothing other than the love of country…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French chose to focus on ideology, social tensions, and political circumstances. In the end these were all major players in the descent into Terror. As a result, the common people of France are also as accountable for the Terror as the radical political clubs, and individuals such as Robespierre, because they were all connected to each other and could have served as a check for the other groups. The Terror is simply the result of the French people being so shocked by their own power which arose during the French Revolution and not taking a step back to think practically, instead of…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He took adventage of the desire of the people for a non aristocratic rule to endorse a one man government with him as the emporer. He led the masses in invoking hate and prejudice over foreigners and their neighbouring state by his malicious critisms and opinions. Even though the first years of his tenure were accompanied by significant economic progress, his authoritarian system and oppression of the opposition later defined him a dictator like any other. Being an army general, napoleon was successful in maintaining law and order as well as peace throughout france. The people had limited avenues to rebel or oppose the emperor and his administration and as such always had control over france until his defeat in…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this time France was a limited monarchy, meaning that the Kings didn’t have complete power. They would have to rule with someone else. This monarchy was eventually destroyed and a republic was formed. At the same time, the Jacobins, supporters of Maximillian Robespierre and thought violence was a good choice to control the public, had political control in the National…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the French Revolution, revolutionaries wanted to create a government that would value people’s rights. Unfortunately, violence started to play a role in order to achieve the goals of the revolution. The period in which the violence started became known as the Reign of Terror. Individual rights were being ignored and thousands of people were being executed because they were suspected of aiding or being an enemy. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the actions toward external threat did not require it, the actions toward internal threat did not deserve it, and the methods that were used were to extreme.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre would not allow anything to defer the completion of the revolution, this is especially evident during the Wars of the Vendée, in which the Vendée rebelled against the injustices of the revolution. The Committee originally hoped for a pacification, nevertheless when faced with resistance they decided “that a severe and swift example” needed to be set (Buchez, B 1793), meaning the city of Vendee had to be subdued using violence, this is behaviour is reminiscent of other dictators like Hitler and Stalin, (Kekes J 2006; Piedro A 2018). This illustrates Robespierre’s tyrannical behaviour to achieve his goal. Other revolutionary leaders like Georges Dante, who initially supported Robespierre began to question the terror and the justification, which led to his execution. Dantes’ only crime was opposing Robespierre, which demonstrates the oppressive society which Robespierre created.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre spoke on February 5, 1794 to inspire the crowds of the revolution to eliminate the internal threats, which included spies and anyone who spoke of counter revolutionary thoughts. Robespierre expressed the idea that royalists were not enemies, but simply strangers that needed to be stopped for the safety of everyone. He also speaks of the peaceful times that will come after this happens and after the revolution is over (Doc G). The translation of Robespierre’s speech waters down to by eliminating the spies and royalists, the public would be safer and all threats against the revolution would be abolished inside of France. Unfortunately, Robespierre was too driven by power and fear, he was executed for using his power the wrong way.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The human life lost in the process fails to justify the war. Failing to provide sufficient verification of the death of those innocent lives live Iraq and Afghanistan, the preventative war raged against the terrorists. The implications of of war on terror could be the bridge to despiting the Middle Eastern regions though the majority of people are innocent and are forced to live under a democratic government that have shaken the world. History has proved that as long as ideologies differ, intolerance reigns supreme and the innocent by-standers lose out. Revenge and hatred will lead an increase in wars and in return, many innocent lives will not be paid by any means.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays