Tyranny Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
Tyranny (cruel and oppressive government or rule) is viewed in many different ways. In 1787 the founding father met in Philadelphia to discuss problems about the nation. They discussed the article of confederation but after a long debate it didn’t work out, the article of confederation had to go. They came to an agreement that they should make a new “Article of Confederation,” so they made another paper called The Constitution. They said that the new article (The Constitution) will start a new kind of government. They said it is going to include federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and deciding to give small and big states different rights.
So, how did the Constitution guard against tyranny? There are a couple of ways it did that. One of the ways was Federalism (powers given to the government, the
…show more content…
“...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on other…[The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other,” (Doc C) This means that the other branches can check on each other to make sure they all have the same amount of power. The way they check is by using their powers to agree or disagree about something that the other branch had done. They can decline a different branches idea or something they did to the president. If one branch had more power than the other then it can be an act of tyranny. There are many forms of tyranny, like I said, and there are many ways to prevent tyranny. All in all, that is how the Constitution will guard against tyranny. Tyranny is like a burglar that can take over an defenseless home or person. The Constitution is the superhero that can stop that burglars from stealing. Overall, the Constitution has been guarding against tyranny for 230 years to this day and hopefully it will continue to guard our nation for another 230

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Guard Against Tyranny Dbq

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document B it states that tyranny can stay in a democracy for however long the ruler can keep it there. The Legislative branch which is the congress is there to make the laws. The executive branch which is the president, is there to carry the laws out. The judicial branch which is the court's, interprets laws. Allowing a person to be elected to the house of representatives and at the same time on the supreme court, Madison did not like the idea because the laws wouldn't be equal.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the fifty-five delegates come together to make brilliant laws to prevent tyranny in their country. In documents A,C, and D, it lists the laws that made the United States more of a democracy rather than a republic. The delegates established federalism to prevent tyranny in the Unites States by.... “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So, in The Constitution: How Did It Guard Against Tyranny? Well they used different types of methods to guard against tyranny. For instance, they used Federalism, checks and balances, and separation of powers.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Dbq

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As evidenced by Doc B “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” COTUS establishes the legislative branch, see Article I, Section 1, the executive branch, see Article II, Section 1, Clause 1, and the judicial branch, see Article III, Section 1, Clause 1. Each branch has distinct powers, separate from the other branches. The separation of power protects against tyranny because it takes the powers of govt and splits them among three…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Tyranny

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Which basically means that each branch of government should be allowed aloud to check on each other to make sure that they aren’t doing anything unconstitutional. In Document C it states “... the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” They check on each other by using their equal power by approving or disapproving something that the other branch has worked on. For example the judicial branch can impeach the president (from the executive branch) if acts in unconstitutional conduct, but the president can nominate the judicial branch members. If one branch overpowers the rest than that is considered tyranny.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the different offices are at an appropriate size, then the judiciary officials can allow a set of rules, and the President can approve authorities. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches are all at the proper scope. Equally important, James Madison declared that the offices will keep each other in check. Madison announced, “...that they [the offices] may be a check on the other…” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The separation of powers is between branches of the national government. In a letter written to James Madison, Thomas Jefferson talked about the three branches of government and then he explains to him that, “The principle of the Constitution is that of a separation of legislative, executive, and judiciary functions except in cases specified”(document 2). This shows how the constitution guards against tyranny because it shows the separation of powers in the branches is what keeps things going smoothly in the government forms of control and splits it as equally as possible. Thomas Jefferson was also one of the founding fathers, he even wrote the declaration of independence and later he was the third president of the United States. His past affects his anti tyranny and his view on the separation of powers being crucial to that because he had a lot of history in working in the government so he knew just how helpful the organization between the branches, beneficial it can be to compromise, and how helpful it is for the people.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government in many ways, they did this in order to make sure that their system of government wouldn't get out of control. There is a check for everything, everything is in a system of order, so... here are some ways that The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government. For Example: The Great Compromise.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the political theorist and philosopher, Edmund Burke said; “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.” The United States of America was ruled by a tyrant king in 1776; they fought back which lead them to declare freedom and seek a new form of government. How does our written plan of government prevent all the power from going to a single place? Our plan of government stops a single place from getting too much power by federalism, separation of power, checks, and balances, and the great compromise. First, federalism prevents tyranny.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution of the United States of America is the outline of the duties, powers, and rights the government and the people of the US have. In 1788, the founding ratified this crucial document in the 13 colonies. When writing the law of the land, they had the future in mind, considering that with time, the Constitution will have to adjust to society’s expansion and change. With that said, the Constitution has stand the test of time and stood strong working with the nation’s rapid development.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major principles that accounts for the president’s powers and the limitation on these powers is separation of powers. Separation of powers in the United States means that the government is separated into three branches, the legislative branch, the executive branch and the judicial branch. The legislative branch makes the laws, while the executive branch enforces them and the judicial branch interprets the laws and defends the constitution. The roles of the three branches of government are established in the first three articles of the constitution, and in Article 2 the president’s control of the executive branch is given, “The Executive Power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America” (Article) U.S. Const.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each of the branches have a set of checks and balances on all the other branches. The Framers also realized that in the future, our country would become more diverse. There would be certain changes that needed to be made to the Constitution to make the people of America at peace. The Framers made Article five for that purpose which states what can be strictly changed in the Constitution.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Natural Rights The Enlightenment was a time period between 1650 and 1800 in Europe where people began to use logic rather than rely on the church or a king. People began to question religious beliefs and become more tolerant of new ideas. Philosophes such as Baron de Montesquieu, John Locke, Cesare Beccaria and many more introduce revolutionary new ideals that still affect our society today. Natural rights influenced the people and led them to revolution.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the Judicial branch then evaluates the laws, and check if they are constitutional or unconstitutional. This process is called Checks and Balances, “The system of separate institutions sharing some powers… its purpose is to keep power divided among the three branches” (Turner,27). By this definition not one power is meant to be all powerful, although…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays