Completing the assessment on conflict management I was able to determine my conflict management style from highest to lowest. My highest conflict handling style was compromising with avoiding being my lowest. During the assessment questions I based my answers on how I would handle situations at work. At work I approach conflicts in a manner in which is best for the company, achieves a long term solution and what option is the most financially feasible. At times this means compromising to achieve the best results or collaborating with other departments.
(1) Upon review of the results of my conflict management style assessment I was not overly surprised by the outcome. My strongest attribute was a compromising approach. The goal of compromising is an “I win some, You win some” result. I find this to be accurate to my style. I have always seen both sides to a situation and in doing so am able to sacrifice something on my end to achieve an end result …show more content…
In my opinion these two styles of conflict management are relatively similar to each other. Both result in a goal where both parties involved win to some degree. In compromising both parties sacrifice some of their goals for each to effectively win some. Whereas in collaborating, conflicts are resolved by finding creative solutions for a win-win solution for both parties, allowing each party to get what they need. The relationship between the parties plays an important role in conflict management in all of the approaches. In compromising the goal is to maintain the relationship between the parties involved while each sacrifices some part of their goal. While in collaboration, the value of the relation is held high and important to both parties. As a result both parties involved respect and trust each other to achieve winning results for all
(1) Upon review of the results of my conflict management style assessment I was not overly surprised by the outcome. My strongest attribute was a compromising approach. The goal of compromising is an “I win some, You win some” result. I find this to be accurate to my style. I have always seen both sides to a situation and in doing so am able to sacrifice something on my end to achieve an end result …show more content…
In my opinion these two styles of conflict management are relatively similar to each other. Both result in a goal where both parties involved win to some degree. In compromising both parties sacrifice some of their goals for each to effectively win some. Whereas in collaborating, conflicts are resolved by finding creative solutions for a win-win solution for both parties, allowing each party to get what they need. The relationship between the parties plays an important role in conflict management in all of the approaches. In compromising the goal is to maintain the relationship between the parties involved while each sacrifices some part of their goal. While in collaboration, the value of the relation is held high and important to both parties. As a result both parties involved respect and trust each other to achieve winning results for all