The first conflict was described in our text as avoidance, which occurs when there is a low concern for yourself and a low concern for the other party (Bevan & Sole, 2014). When our style is to avoid conflict, we believe that if we just ignore an issue, it will go away. The second conflict style that was seen was compromise, in which there is a moderate concern both for yourself and for the other person. Compromising in conflict involves some gains and some losses for both parties. The individuals in the conflict work together to create a fair solution that is acceptable for both of them, but that also means that no one gets entirely what he or she wants (Bevan & Sole, 2014). The last conflict style used during the interrogation was collaborating, where both individuals get something in return. This is very similar to quid pro quo, a favor or trade-off expected in return for
The first conflict was described in our text as avoidance, which occurs when there is a low concern for yourself and a low concern for the other party (Bevan & Sole, 2014). When our style is to avoid conflict, we believe that if we just ignore an issue, it will go away. The second conflict style that was seen was compromise, in which there is a moderate concern both for yourself and for the other person. Compromising in conflict involves some gains and some losses for both parties. The individuals in the conflict work together to create a fair solution that is acceptable for both of them, but that also means that no one gets entirely what he or she wants (Bevan & Sole, 2014). The last conflict style used during the interrogation was collaborating, where both individuals get something in return. This is very similar to quid pro quo, a favor or trade-off expected in return for